Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy Using O-Arm, Robotic Guidance, or Freehand Technique

Spine

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2018, Pages E373-E378

  Laudato, Pietro Aniello ^a   Pierzchala, Katarzyna ^b   Schizas, Constantin ^c  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c Hirslanden Group   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

cone beam navigation; fluoroscopic guidance; lumbar spine surgery; pedicle screw accuracy; robotic guidance; spine fellow accuracy; spine fusion; spine instrumentation; spine surgery; technologies in spine surgery

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICES; FEMALE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; PEDICLE SCREW; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEDICLE SCREWS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 85044127025     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002449     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21: 1320-4.
2. Schizas C, Thein E, Kwiatkowski B, et al. Pedicle screw insertion: robotic assistance versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Acta Orthop Belg 2012;78:240-5.
3. Garber ST, Bisson EF, Schmidt MH. Comparison of three-dimensional fluoroscopy versus postoperative computed tomography for the assessment of accurate screw placement after instrumented spine surgery. Global Spine J 2012;2:95-8.
4. Rampersaud YR, Pik JH, Salonen D, et al. Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:E183-90.
5. Shin MH, Ryu KS, Park CK. Accuracy and safety in pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spines: comparison study between conventional C-arm fluoroscopy and navigation coupled with O-arm(R) guided methods. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 52:204-9.
6. Wu MH, Dubey NK, Li YY, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study. Spine J 2017;17:1082-90.
7. Tabaraee E, Gibson AG, Karahalios DG, et al. Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:1953-8.
8. Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 2011;20:875-81.
9. van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:E986-91.
10. Roser F, Tatagiba M,Maier G. Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery 2013;72 (Suppl 1):12-8.
11. Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;20:636-43.
12. Ringel F, Stuer C, Reinke A, et al. Accuracy of robot-assisted placement of lumbar and sacral pedicle screws: a prospective randomized comparison to conventional freehand screw implantation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E496-501.
13. Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 2011;20:860-8.
14. Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, et al. Minimally invasive robotic versus open fluoroscopic-guided spinal instrumented fusions: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:353-8.
15. Marcus HJ, Cundy TP, Nandi D, et al. Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2014;23:291-7.
16. Liu H, Chen W, Wang Z, et al. Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016;11:2273-81.
17. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:E111-20.
18. Kim YW, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Free-hand pedicle screw placement during revision spinal surgery: analysis of 552 screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1141-8.
19. Villard J, Ryang YM, Demetriades AK, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:1004-9.
20. Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, et al. Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital. Occup Med (Lond) 2005;55:498-500.
21. Wagner TA, Lai SM, Asher MA. SRS surgeon members' risk for thyroid cancer: Is it increased? 41st Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Monterey, CA; 2006.
22. Moore B, vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, et al. The relationship between back pain and lead apron use in radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:191-3.
23. Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Castro CA, et al. The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images for the assessment of pedicle screw postion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E119-25.