Perfusion precision in bolus-tracking MRI: Estimation using the wild-bootstrap method

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 696-704

  Calamante, Fernando ^a,b   Connelly, Alan ^a,b  

^a FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bolus tracking MRI; Bootstrap; Cerebral blood flow; Deconvolution; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DECONVOLUTION;

BOOTSTRAP; CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; DECONVOLUTION ANALYSIS; DECONVOLUTION METHOD; PERFUSION; PERFUSION MEASUREMENTS; REPEATED MEASUREMENTS; RESEARCH APPLICATIONS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ACCURACY; AGED; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; BOOTSTRAPPING; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN PERFUSION; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 85042606675     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21889     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hjort N, Butcher K, Davis SM, Kidwell CS, Koroshetz WJ, Röther J, Schellinger PD, Warach S, Østergaard L; UCLA Thrombolysis Investigators. Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarct. Stroke 2005;36:388-397.
2. Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:701-735.
3. Grandin C, Bol A, Smith A, Michel C, Cosnard G. Absolute CBF and CBV measurements by MRI bolus tracking before and after acetazolamide challenge: repeatability and comparison with PET in humans. Neuroimage 2005;26:525-535.
4. Shin W, Horowitz S, Ragin A, Chen Y, Walker M, Carroll TJ. Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: evaluation of reproducibility and age- and gender-dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1232-1241.
5. Carroll TJ, Teneggi V, Jobin M, Squassante L, Treyer V, Hany TF, Burger C, Wang L, Bye A, Von Schulthess GK, Buck A. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance, reproducibility of the method, and comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1149-1156.
6. Weber MA, Günther M, Lichy MP, Delorme S, Bongers A, Thilmann C, Essig M, Zuna I, Schad LR, Debus J, Schlemmer HP. Comparison of arterial spin-labeling techniques and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in perfusion imaging of normal brain tissue. Invest Radiol 2003;38:712-718.
7. Levin JM, Kaufman MJ, Ross MJ, Mendelson JH, Maas LC, Cohen M, Renshaw PF. Sequential dynamic susceptibility contrast MR experiments in human brain: residual contrast agent effect, steady state, and hemodynamic perturbation. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:655-663.
8. Levin JM, Wald LL, Kaufman MJ, Ross MJ, Maas LC, Renshaw PF. T1 effects in sequential dynamic susceptibility contrast experiments. J Magn Reson 1998;130: 292-295.
9. Bongartz G. Imaging in the time of NFD/NSF: do we have to change our routines concerning renal insufficiency? MAGMA 2007;20:57-62.
10. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. Appl Physiol 1954;6:731-744.
11. Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
12. Murase K, Yamazaki Y, Shinohara M. Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:3147-3159.
13. Zoubir AM, Iskander RD. Bootstrap methods and applications. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2007;24:10-19.
14. Flachaire E. Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: wildbootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap. Comput Stat Data Anal 2005;49:361-376.
15. Smith MR, Lu H, Frayne R. Signal-to-noise ratio effects in quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:122-128.
16. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
17. Calamante F, Vonken EPA, van Osch MJP. Contrast agent concentration measurements affecting quantification of bolus-tracking perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:544-553.
18. Whitcher B, Tuch DS, Wisco JJ, Sorensen AG, Wang L. Using the wild-bootstrap to quantify uncertainty in diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:346-362.
19. MacKinnon JG, White H. Some heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. J Econometrics 1985;29:305-325.
20. Østergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:726-736.
21. Calamante F, Mørup M, Hansen LK. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:789-797.
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
23. Quarles CC, Ward BD, Schmainda KM. Improving the reliability of obtaining tumor hemodynamic parameters in the presence of contrast agent extravasation. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1307-1316.
24. Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1990;12:629-639.
25. Biagi L, Abbruzzese A, Bianchi MC, Alsop DC, Del Guerra A, Tosetti M. Age dependence of cerebral perfusion assessed by magnetic resonance continuous arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:696-702.
26. Zhu T, Liu X, Connelly PR, Zhong J. An optimized wild-bootstrap method for evaluation of measurement uncertainties of DTI-derived parameters in human brain. Neuroimage 2008;40:1144-1156.
27. Chung SW, Lu Y, Henry RG. Comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimation of uncertainties of DTI parameters. Neuroimage 2006;33:531-541.
28. Kershaw LE, Buckley DL. Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:986-992.
29. Andersen IK, Szymkowiak A, Rasmussen CE, Hanson LG, Marstrand JR, Larsson HBW, Hansen LK. Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:351-361.
30. Mouridsen K, Friston K, Hjort N, Gyldensted L, Østergaard L, Kiebel S. Bayesian estimation of cerebral perfusion using a physiological model of microvasculature. Neuroimage 2006;33:570-579.