The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2018, Pages

  Gärtner, Fania R ^a   Bomhof Roordink, Hanna ^a   Smith, Ian P ^a   Scholl, Isabelle ^b,c   Stiggelbout, Anne M ^a   Pieterse, Arwen H ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHECKLIST; CONSENSUS; CONTENT VALIDITY; EMBASE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MEDLINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCINFO; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SHARED DECISION MAKING; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS; WEB OF SCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DECISION MAKING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85042201135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191747     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(5):681–92. PMID: 9032835
2. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98(10):1172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022 PMID: 26215573
3. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Jama. 1992; 267 (16):2221–6. PMID: 1556799
4. Wennberg JE, Barnes BA, Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982; 16(7):811–24. PMID: 7100999
5. Couet N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2015; 18(4):542–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12054PMID: 23451939
6. Kunneman M, Engelhardt EG, Ten Hove FL, Marijnen CA, Portielje JE, Smets EM, et al. Deciding about (neo-)adjuvant rectal and breast cancer treatment: Missed opportunities for shared decision making. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2016; 55(2):134–9.
7. Kashaf MS, McGill E. Does Shared Decision Making in Cancer Treatment Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Literature Review. Med Decis Making. 2015; 35(8):1037–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X15598529 PMID: 26246515
8. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015; 35(1):114–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14551638 PMID: 25351843
9. Dion M, Diouf NT, Robitaille H, Turcotte S, Adekpedjou R, Labrecque M, et al. Teaching Shared Decision Making to Family Medicine Residents: A Descriptive Study of a Web-Based Tutorial. JMIR medical education. 2016; 2(2):e17. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.6442 PMID: 27993760
10. Legare F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014(9):Cd006732. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3 PMID: 25222632
11. Shepherd HL, Barratt A, Jones A, Bateson D, Carey K, Trevena LJ, et al. Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient-Clinician Communication Model((R)) intervention in a primary health-care setting. Health Expect. 2016; 19(5):1160–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12409 PMID: 26364752
12. Bouniols N, Leclere B, Moret L. Evaluating the quality of shared decision making during the patient-carer encounter: a systematic review of tools. BMC research notes. 2016; 9:382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2164-6 PMID: 27485434
13. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C, Kinnersley P, et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 43(1):5–22. PMID: 11311834
14. Légaré F, Kearing S, Clay K, Gagnon S, D’Amours D, Rousseau M, et al. Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56(8):e308–e14. PMID: 20705870
15. Scholl I, Koelewijn-van LM, Sepucha K, Elwyn G, Legare F, Härter M, et al. Measurement of shared decision making—a review of instruments. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011; 105(4):313–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012 PMID: 21620327
16. Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, Ricci Garotti MG, Suman A, de Vet HC, Mokkink LB. The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2016; 25(4):767–79.
17. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18 (8):1115–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5 PMID: 19711195
18. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010; 341:c5146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5146 PMID: 20947577
19. Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, Frosch D, Legare F, Montori VM, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012; 344:e256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e256 PMID: 22286508
20. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(4):539–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 PMID: 20169472
21. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 PMID: 17161752
22. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2010; 63(7):737–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 PMID: 20494804
23. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2012; 21(4):651–7.
24. Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-87 PMID: 21645355
25. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet HC, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2012; 21(4):659–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9965-9 PMID: 21735306
26. Melbourne E, Roberts S, Durand MA, Newcombe R, Legare F, Elwyn G. Dyadic OPTION: Measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 83(1):55–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.019 PMID: 20537837
27. Kasper J, Hoffmann F, Heesen C, Kopke S, Geiger F. MAPPIN’SDM—the multifocal approach to sharing in shared decision making. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034849 PMID: 22514677
28. Martin LR, DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS. Facilitation of patient involvement in care: development and validation of a scale. Behavioral medicine (Washington, DC). 2001; 27(3):111–20.
29. Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 80(1):94–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034 PMID: 19879711
30. Alvarez K, Wang Y, Alegria M, Ault-Brutus A, Ramanayake N, Yeh YH, et al. Psychometrics of shared decision making and communication as patient centered measures for two language groups. Psychol Assess. 2016; 28(9):1074–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000344 PMID: 27537002
31. Ballesteros J, Moral E, Brieva L, Ruiz-Beato E, Prefasi D, Maurino J. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory model-ling and confirmatory factor analysis. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2017; 15(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0656-2 PMID: 28431587
32. De Las Cuevas C, Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Cebolla-Marti A, Scholl I, Harter M. Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. Health Expect. 2014.
33. Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S, Pieterse AH, Kroonenberg PM, Scholl I, van der Weijden T, Luyten GP, et al. Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0132158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132158PMID: 26151946
34. Zisman-Ilani Y, Roe D, Scholl I, Harter M, Karnieli-Miller O. Shared Decision Making During Active Psychiatric Hospitalization: Assessment and Psychometric Properties. Health Commun. 2016:1–5.
35. Scholl I, Kriston L, Dirmaier J, Buchholz A, Harter M. Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire—physician version (SDM-Q-Doc). Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 88(2):284–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005 PMID: 22480628
36. Bradley JG, Zia MJ, Hamilton N. Patient preferences for control in medical decision making: a scenario-based approach. Fam Med. 1996; 28(7):496–501. PMID: 8818621
37. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997; 29(3):21–43. PMID: 9505581
38. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. The development of COMRADE—a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50(3):311–22. PMID: 12900105
39. Simon D, Schorr G, Wirtz M, Vodermaier A, Caspari C, Neuner B, et al. Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63(3):319–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012 PMID: 16872793
40. Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 93(1):102–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009 PMID: 23768763
41. Rosenberg D, Schon UK, Nyholm M, Grim K, Svedberg P. Shared decision making in Swedish community mental health services—an evaluation of three self-reporting instruments. J Ment Health. 2017; 26 (2):142–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1207223 PMID: 27452763
42. Chang C. Developing the First Validity of Shared Medical Decision Making Questionnaires in Taiwan. Global Journal of medical research: K Interdisciplinary. 2014; 14(2):8–15.
43. Chang C-C. The first validity of shared medical decisionmaking questionnaire in Taiwan. Management in Health. 2014; 18(3):11–5.
44. Fowler FJ, Sepucha KR, Stringfellow V. A Short, Patient-Reported Measrue of Shared Decision Making. in progress.
45. Vedam S, Stoll K, Martin K, Rubashkin N, Partridge S, Thordarson D, et al. The Mother’s Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2):e0171804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171804 PMID: 28231285
46. Ebrahimi MAH, Hajebrahimi S, Mostafaie H, Pashazadeh F, Hajebrahimi A. Physicians’ Perspectives Towards Shared Decision Making in Developing Countries. British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research. 2014; 4(18):3458–64.
47. Calderon C, Ferrando PJ, Carmona-Bayonas A, Lorenzo-Seva U, Jara C, Beato C, et al. Validation of SDM-Q-Doc Questionnaire to measure shared decision-making physician’s perspective in oncology practice. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017.
48. Braddock CH, III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999; 282(24):2313–20. PMID: 10612318
49. Guimond P, Bunn H, O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Tait VK, Drake ER, et al. Validation of a tool to assess health practitioners’ decision support and communication skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50 (3):235–45. PMID: 12900093
50. Stacey D, Taljaard M, Drake ER, O’Connor AM. Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse-standardized patient encounters. Patient Education and Counseling. 2008; 73(3):519–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.016 PMID: 18722074
51. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12(2):93–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.2.93 PMID: 12679504
52. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005; 8 (1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x PMID: 15713169
53. Goss C, Fontanesi S, Mazzi MA, Del PL, Rimondini M, Elwyn G, et al. Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 66(3):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.002 PMID: 17433603
54. Hirsch O, Keller H, Muller-Engelmann M, Gutenbrunner MH, Krones T, Donner-Banzhoff N. Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale. Health Expect. 2012; 15(4):379–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00689.x PMID: 21521432
55. Keller H, Hirsch O, Muller-Engelmann M, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Krones T, Donner-Banzhoff N. Trying to optimise the German version of the OPTION scale regarding the dyadic aspect of shared decision making. Methods Inf Med. 2013; 52(6):514–21. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME13-01-0011 PMID: 23907324
56. Stubenrouch FE, Pieterse AH, Falkenberg R, Santema TK, Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, et al. OPTION versus OPTION instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2015.
57. Elwyn G, Tsulukidze M, Edwards A, Legare F, Newcombe R. Using a’talk’ model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 93(2):265–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.005 PMID: 24029581
58. Shields CG, Franks P, Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Epstein RM. Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD): reliability and validity. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3(5):436–42. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.305 PMID: 16189060
59. Brown RF, Butow PN, Juraskova I, Ribi K, Gerber D, Bernhard J, et al. Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations. Health Expect. 2011; 14(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00613.x PMID: 20629766
60. Singh S, Butow P, Charles M, Tattersall MH. Shared decision making in oncology: assessing oncologist behaviour in consultations in which adjuvant therapy is considered after primary surgical treatment. Health Expect. 2010; 13(3):244–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00587.x PMID: 20579121
61. Kearney JA, Byrne MW. Planning with parents for seriously ill children: preliminary results on the development of the parental engagement scale. Palliat Support Care. 2011; 9(4):367–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951511000381 PMID: 22104412
62. Clayman ML, Makoul G, Harper MM, Koby DG, Williams AR. Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient-healthcare provider encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 88 (3):367–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.011 PMID: 22784391
63. Salyers MP, Matthias MS, Fukui S, Holter MC, Collins L, Rose N, et al. A coding system to measure elements of shared decision making during psychiatric visits. Psychiatr Serv. 2012; 63(8):779–84. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100496 PMID: 22854725
64. Kienlin S, Kristiansen M, Ofstad E, Liethmann K, Geiger F, Joranger P, et al. Validation of the Norwegian version of MAPPIN’SDM, an observation-based instrument to measure shared decision-making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2016.
65. Melbourne E, Sinclair K, Durand MA, Legare F, Elwyn G. Developing a dyadic OPTION scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 78(2):177–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.009 PMID: 19647970
66. Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O’Donnell MT. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 53(6):721–32. PMID: 11511048
67. Kremer H, Ironson G. Measuring the involvement of people with HIV in treatment decision making using the control preferences scale. Med Decis Making. 2008; 28(6):899–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08317014 PMID: 18757843
68. Knapp C, Huang IC, Madden V, Vadaparampil S, Quinn G, Shenkman E. An evaluation of two decisionmaking scales for children with life-limiting illnesses. Palliative medicine. 2009; 23(6):518–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216309104892 PMID: 19346274
69. Scholl I, Kriston L, Dirmaier J, Harter M. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale—an attempt to establish convergent validity. Health Expect. 2015; 18 (1):137–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12022 PMID: 23176071
70. Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3085 PMID: 24389354
71. Weiss MC, Peters TJ. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 70(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001 PMID: 17942270
72. Butow P, Juraskova I, Chang S, Lopez AL, Brown R, Bernhard J. Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context? Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 78(2):261–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.009 PMID: 19647966
73. Kasper J, Heesen C, Kopke S, Fulcher G, Geiger F. Patients’ and observers’ perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS One. 2011; 6 (10):e26255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026255 PMID: 22043310
74. Vortel MA, Adam S, Port-Thompson AV, Friedman JM, Grande SW, Birch PH. Comparing the ability of OPTION and OPTION to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling. Patient Educ Couns. 2016.
75. Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ, Tsulukidze M, Gionfriddo MR, Montori V, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION(5), an observer measure of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98(8):970–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.010 PMID: 25956069
76. Geiger F, Kasper J. Of blind men and elephants: suggesting SDM-MASS as a compound measure for shared decision making integrating patient, physician and observer views. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012; 106(4):284–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2012.03.020 PMID: 22749076
77. Kasper J, Hoffmann F, Heesen C, Kopke S, Geiger F. Completing the third person’s perspective on patients’ involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012; 106(4):275–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2012.04.005 PMID: 22749075
78. Jarvis CB, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM. A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research. 2003; 30:199–218.
79. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in Medicine. 1 ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011 2011.
80. Wollschlager D. Short communication: Where is SDM at home? putting theoretical constraints on the way shared decision making is measured. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesund-heitswesen. 2012; 106(4):272–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2012.04.004 PMID: 22749074
81. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, et al. Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2010; 63(5):524–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010 PMID: 19926446
82. McCaffery KJ, Morony S, Muscat DM, Smith SK, Shepherd HL, Dhillon HM, et al. Evaluation of an Australian health literacy training program for socially disadvantaged adults attending basic education classes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2016;16.