Correction to: Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: A case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (Environmental Evidence (2018) 7 (8) DOI: 10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5);Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: A case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools

Environmental Evidence

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Kohl, Christian ^a   McIntosh, Emma J ^b   Unger, Stefan ^a   Haddaway, Neal R ^c   Kecke, Steffen ^a   Schiemann, Joachim ^a   Wilhelm, Ralf ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Evidence synthesis; Managing systems; Rapid review; Review management; Systematic review software; Text mining; Time management

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041588088     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20472382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13750-018-0124-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (46)

1. Guyatt G. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420-5.
2. (EU) IR. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 503/2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No. 641/2004 and (EC) No. 1981/2006. 2013, OJ L 157; 2013. p. 1-48.
3. Kohl C, Craig W, Frampton G, Garcia-Yi J, van Herck K, Kleter GA, Krogh PH, Meissle M, Romeis J, Spök A. Developing a good practice for the review of evidence relevant to GMO risk assessment. GMOs Integr Plant Prod. 2013;97:55-62.
4. Kohl C, Frampton G, Sweet J, Spök A, Haddaway NR, Wilhelm R, Unger S, Schiemann J. Can systematic reviews inform GMo risk assessment and risk management? Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:113.
5. Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering version 2.3. EBSE Tech Rep. 2007;1-65.
6. EFSA. Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA J. 2010;8(6):1637.
7. CEE. Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2; 2013. p. 1-80.
8. James KL, Randall NP, Haddaway NR. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ Evid. 2016;5:7.
9. Bragge P, Clavisi O, Turner T, Tavender E, Collie A, Gruen RL. The global evidence mapping initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:92.
10. Gathmann A, Priesnitz KU. What is the evidence on the inheritance of resistance alleles in populations of lepidopteran/coleopteran maize pest species: a systematic map protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:13.
11. Gathmann A, Priesnitz KU. How susceptible are different lepidopteran/coleopteran maize pests to Bt-proteins: a systematic review protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:12.
12. Priesnitz KU, Vaasen A, Gathmann A. Baseline susceptibility of different European lepidopteran and coleopteran pests to Bt proteins expressed in Bt maize: a systematic review. Environ Evid. 2016;5:27.
13. Meissle M, Naranjo SE, Kohl C, Riedel J, Romeis J. Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:7.
14. Kostov K, Damgaard CF, Hendriksen NB, Sweet JB, Krogh PH. Are population abundances and biomasses of soil invertebrates changed by Bt crops compared with conventional crops? A systematic review protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:10.
15. Kostov K, Krogh PH, Damgaard CF, Sweet JB, Hendriksen NB. Are soil microbial endpoints changed by Bt crops compared with conventional crops? A systematic review protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:11.
16. Sweet J, Kostov K. What are the effects of the cultivation of GM herbicide tolerant crops on botanical diversity? A systematic review protocol. A systematic review protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:8.
17. Garcia-Yi J, Lapikanonth T, Vionita H, Vu H, Yang S, Zhong Y, Li Y, Nagelschneider V, Schlindwein B, Wesseler J. What are the socio-economic impacts of genetically modified crops worldwide? A systematic map protocol. Environ Evid. 2014;3:24.
18. Marshall C, Brereton P. Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a feature analysis. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement; 2014. p. 296-9.
19. Practice CfRiEB. The systematic review accelerator. Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice; 2017.
20. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of systematic review assistant-deduplication module. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):6.
21. Wallace BC, Small K, Brodley CE, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI); 2012. p. 819-24.
22. Marshall IJ, Kuiper J, Wallace BC. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:193-201.
23. Barn BS, Raimondi F, Athappian L, Clark T. Slrtool: a tool to support collaborative systematic literature reviews. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS-2014). Science and Technology Publications, Lda.; 2014. p. 440-7.
24. Hassler E, Carver JC, Hale D, Al-Zubidy A. Identification of SLR tool needs - results of a community workshop. Inf Softw Technol. 2016;70:122-9.
25. Marshall C, Brereton P, Kitchenham B. Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a cross-domain survey using semi-structured interviews. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering - EASE '15; 2015. p. 1-6.
26. Collins A, Coughlin D, Miller J, Kirk S. The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: a how to guide. London: Joint Water Evidence Group; 2015.
27. O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev. 2015;4:5.
28. Thomas J, McNaught J, Ananiadou S. Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Res Synth Methods. 2011;2:1-14.
29. Molléri JS, Benitti FBV. ARS - Uma abordagem para automatização de revisões sistemáticas da literatura em engenharia de software: Relatório Técnico. Itajaí, Brazil; 2013.
30. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10.
31. Roll U, Correia RA, Berger-Tal O. Using machine learning to disentangle homonyms in large text corpora. Conserv Biol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13044.
32. CADIMA. Quedlinburg, Germany: Julius Kühn-Institut; 2017.
33. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation.
34. DistillerSR. Ottawa, Canada: Evidence Partners.
35. Glujovsky D, Bardach A, García Martí S, Comandé D, Ciapponi A. EROS: a new software for early stage of systematic reviews. Value Health. 2011;14:A564.
36. Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-reviewer 4: software for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education; 2010.
37. HAWC. Health Assessment Workplace Collaborative. 2013.
38. Shapiro A, Rusyn I. Health assessment workspace collaborative (HAWC) project overview; 2014.
39. Lajeunesse MJ. Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction, and meta-analysis with the METAGEAR package for R. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;7:323-30.
40. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A, Chalmers T, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, et al. Rayyan - a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.
41. Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.
42. Fernández-Sáez AM, Genero Bocco M, Romero FP. SLR-Tool a tool for performing systematic literature reviews. In: ICSOFT 2010 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software and Data Technologies. 2010; 2:157-66.
43. Bowes D, Hall T, Beecham S. SLuRp: a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver valid and rigorous results. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Evidential assessment of software technologies - EAST '12; 2012. p. 33-6.
44. Fabbri S, Silva C, Hernandes E, Octaviano F, Di Thommazo A, Belgamo A. Improvements in the StArt tool to better support the systematic review process. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering - EASE '16 2016. p. 1-5.
45. Howard BE, Phillips J, Miller K, Tandon A, Mav D, Shah MR, Holmgren S, Pelch KE, Walker V, Rooney AA, et al. SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016;5:87.
46. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Facility (Syrf). Edinburgh, UK: CAMARADES-NC3Rs; 2017.