Comparing social media data and survey data in assessing the attractiveness of Beijing Olympic Forest Park

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2018, Pages

  Wang, Zhifang ^a   Jin, Yue ^a,b   Liu, Yu ^a   Li, Dong ^c   Zhang, Bo ^d  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Hyrea International Real Estate Consultant Co Ltd   (China)

^c Beijing Tsinghua Tongheng Urban Planning and Design Institute   (China)

^d OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beijing Olympic Forest Park; Landscape attractiveness; Research methods; Social media data; Survey data

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ASSESSMENT METHOD; DATA SET; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; NATURALNESS; PRIORITIZATION; RESEARCH METHOD; SOCIAL MEDIA; SURVEY;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; OLYMPIC FOREST PARK;

EID: 85041520105     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su10020382     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Holsapple, C.; Hsiao, S.H.; Pakath, R. Business Social Media Analytics: Definition, Benefits and Challenges. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, United States, 7-9 August 2014. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d7d7/1ec49476e54a350e9091087345dcd3d7866c.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2018)
2. Dodds, P.S.; Harris, K.D.; Kloumann, I.M.; Bliss, C.A.; Danforth, C.M. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26752
3. Jenkins, A.; Croitoru, A.; Crooks, A.T.; Stefanidis, A. Crowdsourcing a collective sense of place. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152932
4. Yang, L.; Wu, L.; Liu, Y.; Kang, C. Quantifying tourist behavior patterns by travel motifs and geo-tagged photos from Flickr. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 345
5. Wood, S.A.; Guerry, A.D.; Silver, J.M.; Lacayo, M. Using social media to quantify nature-based tourism and recreation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2976
6. Crandall, D.; Snavely, N. Modeling people and places with internet photo collections. Commun. ACM 2012, 55, 52-60
7. Sakaki, T.; Matsuo, Y.; Yanagihara, T.; Chandrasiri, N.P.; Nawa, K. Real-time event extraction for driving information from social sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), Bangkok, Thailand, 27-31 May 2012
8. Guerrero, P.; Møller, M.S.; Olafsson, A.S.; Snizek, B. Revealing cultural ecosystem services through Instagram images: The potential of social media volunteered geographic information for urban green infrastructure planning and governance. Urban Plan. 2016, 1, 1-17
9. Dunkel, A. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 142, 173-186
10. Liu, L.; Zhou, B.; Zhao, J.; Ryan, B.D. C-IMAGE: city cognitive mapping through geo-tagged photos. GeoJournal 2016, 81, 817-861
11. Pauleen, D.J.; Wang, W.Y.C. Does big data mean big knowledge? KM perspectives on big data and analytics. J. Knowl. Manag. 2017, 21, 1-6
12. Schofield, P. Big data in mental health research-Do the ends justify the means? Using large data-sets of electronic health records for mental health research. BJPsych Bull. 2017, 41, 129-132
13. Krenchel, M.; Madsbjerg, C. Your Big Data Is Worthless If You Don't Bring It into the Real World. 2014. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2014/04/your-big-data-is-worthless-if-you-dont-bring-it-intothe-real-world/ (accessed on 10 October 2017)
14. Boyd, D.; Crawford, K. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological and scholarly phenomenon. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2012, 15, 662-679
15. Daume, S.; Albert, M.; von Gadow, K. Forest monitoring and social media-Complementary data sources for ecosystem surveillance? For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 316, 9-20
16. Tene, O.; Polonetsky, J. Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwest. J. Technol. Intell. Prop. 2013, 11, 239-273
17. Kim, G.-H.; Trimi, S.; Chung, J.H. Big-data applications in the government sector. Commun. ACM 2014, 57, 78-85
18. Yiu, C. The Big Data Opportunity; The Policy Exchange: London, UK, 2012
19. Washington, A.L. Government information policy in the era of big data. Rev. Policy Res. 2014, 31, 319-325
20. Liu, Y. Revisiting several basic geographical concepts: A social sensing perspective. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2016, 4, 564-575
21. Chhetri, P. Modelling the attractiveness potential of scenic views: A case study of the Grampians National Park, Australia. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2006, 31, 101-107
22. Liu, B.; Mu, X. The Make-up of attraction of city culture and city landscape. Planners 2004, 2, 5-7
23. Wu, B.; Xu, B.; Qiu, F. A Systematic Study on Domestic Tourism Market in China; East China Normal University Press: Shanghai, China, 1999
24. Deng, J.; King, B.; Bauer, T. Evaluating natural attractions for tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2002, 29, 422-438
25. Ritchie, J.R.B.; Zins, M. Culture as determinant of the attractiveness of a tourism region. Ann. Tour. Res. 1978, 5, 252-267
26. Kale, S.H.;Weir, K.M. Marketing third world countries to theWestern traveler: The case of India. J. Travel Res. 1986, 25, 2-7
27. Hu, Y.; Ritchie, J.R.B. Measuring destination attractiveness: A contextual approach. J. Travel Res. 1993, 32, 25-34
28. Kuper, R. Preference, complexity and color information entropy values for visual depictions of plant and vegetative growth. HortTechnology 2015, 25, 625-634
29. Muratet, A.; Pellegrini, P.; Dufour, A.B.; Arrif, T.; Chiron, F. Perception and knowledge of plant diversity among urban park users. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 137, 95-106
30. Bulut, Z.; Yilmaz, H. Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 154, 459-468
31. Nasar, J.L.; Li, M. Landscape mirror: The attractiveness of reflecting water. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 66, 233-238
32. Booth, N.K. Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1983; p. 315
33. Giles-Corti, B.; Broomhall, M.H.; Knuiman, M.; Collins, C.; Douglas, K.; Ng, K.; Lange, A.; Donovan, R.J. Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness and size of public open space? Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 169-176
34. Zhang, H.; Chen, B.; Sun, Z.; Bao, Z. Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 44-52
35. Cetin, M. Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: A case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2015, 22, 490-495
36. Sevenant, M.; Antrop, M. Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2889-2899
37. Van den Berg, A.E.; Koole, S.L. New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 78, 362-372
38. Cetin, M.; Sevik, H. Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 52
39. Dazhongdianping. About Dianping. 2015. Available online: http://www.dianping.com/aboutus (accessed on 15 October 2017)
40. Baidubaike. Mafengwo. 2015. Available online: https://baike.so.com/doc/5342045-5577488.html (accessed on 15 October 2017)
41. iResearch. China Social Network User Research Report 2010-2011. 2011. Available online: http://www. iresearch.com.cn/report/1607.html (accessed on 15 October 2017)
42. Govers, R.; Go, F.M. Projected destination image online: Website content analysis of pictures and text. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2004, 7, 73-89
43. Hankinson, G. Destination brand images: A business tourism perspective. J. Serv. Mark. 2005, 19, 24-32
44. Zhong, L. A reconstruction of destinations' perception structure based on the context and complex network analysis. Tour. Trib. 2015, 30, 88-95
45. Cetin, M. Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: Case study in Kutahya. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2015, 22, 420-424
46. Bedimo-Rung, A.L.; Mowen, A.J.; Cohen, D.A. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 159-168
47. Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Gao, S.; Gong, L.; Kang, C.; Zhi, Y.; Chi, G.; Shi, L. Social sensing: A new approach to understanding our socioeconomic environments. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2015, 105, 512-530
48. Purcell, A.T.; Lamb, R.J. Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1998, 42, 57-66
49. Junker, B.; Buchecker, M. Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 85, 141-154
50. Gobster, P.H. Aldo Leopold's ecological esthetic: Integrating esthetic and biodiversity values. J. For. 1995, 93, 6-10
51. Williams, K.J.H.; Cary, J. Landscape preferences, ecological quality and biodiversity protection. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34, 257-274
52. Sangiambut, S.; Sieber, R. The V in VGI: Citizens or civic data sources. Urban Plan. 2016, 1, 141-154
53. Li, D.; Long, Y. A crowd-sourcing data based analysis framework for urban planning. China City Plan. Rev. 2015, 24, 49-57
54. Hoseini, E.; Mansoori, E.G. Selecting discriminative features in social media data: An unsupervised approach. Neurocomputing 2016, 205, 463-471