Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 142, Issue , 2015, Pages 173-186

  Dunkel, Alexander ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crowdsourcing; Landscape perception; Photo geodata; Social media analysis; Spatio temporal tag clouds

Indexed keywords

CROWDSOURCING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); VISUALIZATION;

BALANCED ASSESSMENT; CROWDSOURCED GEODATA; EXTRACT INFORMATIONS; GEO-DATA; LANDSCAPE PERCEPTIONS; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS; TAG CLOUDS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

DATA ASSIMILATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PERCEPTION; PLANNING PROCESS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN PLANNING; VISUAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION;

CALIFORNIA; KANSAS; MANHATTAN; SAN FRANCISCO [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES; YOSEMITE VALLEY;

EID: 84944177149     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alivand M., Hochmair H. Extracting scenic routes from VGI data sources. Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information 2013, 23-30.
2. Ames M., Naaman M. Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Chi Conference 2007, 971-980.
3. Antoniou V., Morley J., Haklay M. Web 2.0 geotagged photos: Assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon. Geomatica 2010, 64(1):99-110.
4. Bell P.A. Environmental psychology 2001, Fort Worth, TX, Harcourt College Publishers.
5. Brabham D. Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory 2009, 8(3):242-262.
6. Brody S. Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2004, 22(4):407-419.
7. Brown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society & Natural Resources 2005, 18(1):17-39. 10.1080/08941920590881853.
8. Churchman A. Environmental psychology and urban planning: Where can the twain meet?. Handbook of Environmental Psychology 2002, 191-200.
9. Cinnamon J., Schuurman N. Confronting the data-divide in a time of spatial turns and volunteered geographic information. Geojournal 2012, 78(4):657-674.
10. Collier J. Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method 1967, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
11. Cox A.M., Clough P.D., Marlow J. Flickr: A first look at user behaviour in the context of photography as serious leisure. Information Research 2008, 13:1.
12. Crandall D.J., Backstrom L., Huttenlocher D., Kleinberg J. Mapping the world's photos. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web 2009, 761-770. 10.1145/1526709.1526812.
13. Dahinden T., Eggert D., Mondzech J., Paelke V. Location based context awareness through tag-cloud visualizations. International conference on theory, data handling and modelling in geospatial information science 2010, 290-295.
14. Dakin S. There's more to landscape than meets the eye: Towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. The Canadian Geographer 2003, 47(2):185-200.
15. Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54:267-281.
16. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7(3):260-272.
17. Doan A., Ramakrishnan R., Halevy A.Y. Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM 2011, 54(4):86-96. 10.1145/1924421.1924442.
18. Dror I.E., Harnad S.R. Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds 2008, John Benjamins Pub. Co, Amsterdam.
19. Dunkel A. Flickr Spatiotemporal Tag Clouds. Interactive Maps 2014, Web address: http://maps.alexanderdunkel.com.
20. Elwood S. Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. Geojournal 2008, 72:3-4.
21. Erickson T. Some thoughts on a framework for crowdsourcing. Conference paper, crowdsourcing and human computation 2011, Retrieved from: http://crowdresearch.org/chi2011-workshop/papers/erickson.pdf.
22. Fischer E. World map of Flickr and Twitter locations. July 7 2011, Retrieved from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/walkingsf/5912169471/in/set-72157627140310742.
23. Frias-Martinez V., Soto V., Hohwald H., Frias-Martinez E. Characterizing Urban Landscapes using Geolocated Tweets. 2012 Int. Conference on Social Computing 2012, 239-248. 10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT. 2012.19.
24. Girardin F., Fiore F.D., Ratti C., Blat J. Leveraging explicitly disclosed location information to understand tourist dynamics: A case study. Journal of Location Based Services 2008, 2(1):41-56.
25. Goodchild M. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. Geojournal 2007, 69(4):211-221.
26. Gorman S. Why VGI is the Wrong Acronym [Blog post]. April 15 2010, Retrieved from http://blog.geoiq.com/2010/04/15/why-vgi-is-the-wrong-acronym/.
27. Hollenstein L., Purves R.S. Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr to describe city cores. Scientific Journals International 2010, 10.5311/JOSIS. 2010.1.3.
28. Hutchins E. Distributed Cognition. IESBS 2000, University of California, San Diego.
29. Jones C.B., Purves R.S., Clough P.D., Joho H. Modelling vague places with knowledge from the Web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2008, 22(10):1045-1065.
30. Jung D., Park H., Maeng R., Han S. A geometric pattern-based method to build hierarchies of geo-referenced tags. Proceedings 2nd IEEE international conference on social computing 2012, 546-551. 10.1109/SocialCom.2010.86.
31. Kaplan R. The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning 1985, 12(2):161-176.
32. Kennedy L., Naaman M. Generating diverse and representative image search results for landmarks. Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web 2008, 297-306.
33. Kennedy L., Naaman M., Ahern S., Nair R., Rattenbury T. How flickr helps us make sense of the world. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Multimedia 2007, 631-640.
34. Kingston R. Online public participation in planning. The Sage Handbook of GIS and Society 2011, 361-380. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
35. Kisilevich S., Andrienko G., Krstajic M., Keim D., Andrienko N. Event-based analysis of people's activities and behavior using Flickr and Panoramio geotagged photo collections. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information visualisation 2010, 289-296.
36. Krumm J., Davies N., Narayanaswami C. User-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2008, 7(4):10-11.
37. Lynam T., De Jong W., Sheil D., Kusumanto T., Evans K. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1):5.
38. Lynch K. The image of the city 1960, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Lynch K., Banerjee T., Southworth M. City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Markwell K.W. Photo-documentation and analyses as research strategies in human geography. Australian Geographical Studies 2000, 38(1):91-98.
41. Matyas S. Collaborative spatial data acquisition. AGILE Int. conf. on geographic information science 2007.
42. Nasar J.L. The evaluative image of the city. Journal of the American Planning Association 1990, 56:1.
43. Nguyen D.Q., Tominski C., Schumann H., Ta T.A. Visualizing tags with spatiotemporal references. Proceedings of the international conference on information visualisation 2011, 32-39.
44. Nov O., Naaman M., Ye C. Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(3):555-566.
45. Palmer J.F., Hoffman R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54:149-161.
46. Purves S.R., Edwardes J.A. Exploiting volunteered geographic information to describe place. Proceedings of GIS research UK 16th annual conference 2008, 252-255.
47. Rattenbury T., Naaman M. Methods for extracting place semantics from Flickr tags. Transactions on the Web, ACM, New York 2009, 3(1):1-30.
48. Richter K.-F., Winter S. Citizens as database: Conscious ubiquity in data collection. Advances in spatial and temporal databases, 12th international symposium 2011, 445-448.
49. Scott M.J., Canter D.V. Picture or place?. A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1997, 17(4):263-281.
50. Shafer E.L., Richards T.A. A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes 1974, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA.
51. Sontag S. On photography 1977, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
52. Sui D.Z., Elwood S., Goodchild M.F. Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice 2013, Springer, Dordrecht.
53. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds 2005, Anchor Books, New York.
54. Twaroch F., Jones C., Abdelmoty A. Acquisition of a vernacular gazetteer from web sources. Proceedings of the first international workshop on location and the web 2008, 61-64.
55. Zielstra D., Hochmair H.H. Positional accuracy analysis of Flickr and Panoramio images for selected world regions. Journal of Spatial Science 2013, 58(2):251-273.
56. Zube E.H., Sell J.L., Taylor J.G. Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 1982, 9(1):1-33.