Word processors as monarchs: Computer-generated feedback can exercise power over and influence EAL learners' identity representations

Computers and Education

Volumn 120, Issue , 2018, Pages 112-126

  Zaini, Amin ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computer assisted language learning; Computer generated feedback; Identity; Power relations; Writing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; TECHNICAL WRITING;

AUTOMATIC FEEDBACK; COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING; COMPUTER GENERATED; IDENTITY; MICROSOFT WORD; MULTI-MODALITY; POWER RELATIONS; TECHNICAL SENSE;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 85041410613     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. AbuSeileek, A.F., Using track changes and word processor to provide corrective feedback to learners in writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29 (2013), 319–333.
2. Arber, R., Race, ethnicity and education in globalised times. 2008, Springer, Dordrecht.
3. Archer, A., Voice as design: Exploring academic voice in multimodal texts in higher education. Bock, M., Pachler, N., (eds.) Multimodality and social semiosis: Communication, meaning-making, and learning in the works of Gunter Kress, 2013, Routledge, New York, 282–304.
4. Assodar, M., Vaezi, S., Izanloo, B., Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016), 704–716.
5. Bakhtin, M.M., Emerson, C., (eds.) Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics, 1984, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
6. Ball, S.J., Foucault, power and education. 2013, Routledge, New York.
7. rd ed., 2008, Sage, London.
8. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., Literacy practices. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., Ivanic, R., (eds.) Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context, 2000, Routledge, New York, 7–15.
9. Benwell, B., Stokoe, E., Discourse and identity. 2006, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
10. Block, D., Second language identities. 2007, Continuum, New York.
11. Burkette, A., Linguistic and object-based stance-taking in Appalachian interviews. Language in Society 45 (2016), 331–351.
12. Chen, J., White, S., McCloskey, M., Soroui, J., Effects of computer versus paper administration of an adult functional writing assessment. Assessing Writing 16:1 (2011), 49–71.
13. Cheung, A., Slavin, R., How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 7 (2012), 198–215.
14. Cooper, B., Empathy, emotion, technology, and learning. Tettegah, S.Y., McCreery, M.P., (eds.) Emotions, technology, and learning, 2016, Academic Press, Amsterdam, 265–288.
15. Cote, J.E., Levin, C.G., Identity, formation, agency and culture: A social psychological synthesis. 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
16. th ed., 2011, Sage, London.
17. Dornyei, Z., Research methods in applied linguistics: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Ellis, R., A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal 63:2 (2009), 97–107.
19. Ezer, H., Sense and sensitivity: The identity of the scholar-writer in academia. 2015, Sense Publishers, The Netherlands.
20. Fairclough, N., Discourse and social change. 1992, Polity Press, UK.
21. Fairclough, N., Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. 2010, Routledge, London.
22. rd ed., 2015, Routledge, London.
23. Flewitt, R., Messer, D., Kucirkova, N., New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 15:3 (2015), 289–310.
24. Foucault, M., Sheridan, A., (eds.) Discipline and punish: The birth of prison, 1979, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
25. Foucault, M., Gordon, C., Marshall, L., Soper, K., (eds.) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977, 1980, Harvester, UK.
26. Foucault, M., Subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8:4 (1982), 777–795.
27. Foucault, M., Howard, R., (eds.) Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason, 1988, Vintage Books, New York.
28. Foucault, M., Hurly, R., (eds.) Ethics, subjectivity and truth, 1997, The New Press, New York.
29. Gee, J.P., What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. 2003, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
30. rd ed., 2008, Routledge, London.
31. Gerring, J., Case study research: Principles and practices. 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York.
32. Hook, D., Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. 2007, Palgrave Macmillan, Great Britain.
33. Hull, G.A., Nelson, M.E., Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication 22:2 (2005), 224–261.
34. Iedema, R., Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication 2:1 (2003), 29–57.
35. Ivanic, R., Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. 1998, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
36. Kay, R., A formative analysis of how preservice teachers learn to use technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (2007), 366–383.
37. Kress, G., Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., (eds.) Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures, 2000, Routledge, London, 153–161.
38. Kress, G., Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. 2010, Routledge, Abingdon.
39. Kress, G., Jetwitt, C., Ogborn, J., Tsatsarelis, C., Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. 2001, Continuum, London.
40. Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T., Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. 2001, Edward Arnold, London.
41. Kress, G., van Leeuwen, T., Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication 1:3 (2002), 343–368.
42. Lancher, A., Burkhart, C., Nückles, M., Formative computer-based feedback in the university classroom: Specific concept maps scaffold students' writing. Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017), 459–469.
43. Lawler, S., Identity: Sociological perspectives. 2008, Polity Press, Cambridge.
44. Lee, H.H., Leong, A.P., Song, G., Investigating teacher perceptions of feedback. ELT Journal 71:1 (2016), 60–68.
45. Lee, C., Yeung, A.S., Ip, T., Use of computer technology for English language learning: Do learning styles, gender, and age matter?. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:5 (2016), 1035–1051.
46. Lengen, C., The effects of colours, shapes and boundaries of landscapes on perception, emotion and metalizing processes promoting health and well-being. Health & Place 35 (2015), 166–177.
47. Ligorio, M.B., Talamo, A., Pontecorvo, C., Building intersubjectivity at a distance during the collaborative writing of fairy tales. Computers & Education 45 (2005), 357–374.
48. Limbu, L., Markauskaite, L., How do learners experience joint writing: University students' conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers & Education 82 (2015), 393–408.
49. Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., McGill, L., Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28 (2012), 547–556.
50. MacIntyre, P.D., Gardner, R.C., Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning 44:1 (1991), 85–117.
51. Mazdayasna, G., Zaini, A., The effect of collaborative prewriting discussions on L2 writing development and learners' identity construction. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 18:2 (2015), 141–164.
52. Mechling, L.C., Gast, D.L., Thompson, K.L., Comparison of the effects of SMART Board technology and flash card instruction on sight word recognition and observational learning. Journal of Special Education Technology 23 (2008), 34–46.
53. Merriam, S.B., Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. 2009, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
54. Moore, T., Manoeuvring through the maze of methodology: Constructing the research-ready embodied RHD student. Danaher, P., Dervin, F., Dyer, C., Kenny, M., Harreveld, B., Singh, M., (eds.) Palgrave studies in education research methods, 2016, McMillan Publishers, London, 73–88.
55. Motion, J., Heath, R.L., Leitch, S., Social media and public relations: Fake friends and powerful publics. 2016, Routledge, London.
56. Norton, B., Identity and language learning extending the conversation. 2013, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto.
57. Norton, B., Toohey, K., Identity, language learning and social change. Language Teaching 44:4 (2011), 412–446.
58. O'Reilly, M., Parker, N., ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 13:2 (2012), 190–197.
59. Powell, A.L., Computer anxiety: Comparison of research from the 1990s and 2000s. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (2013), 2337–2381.
60. Reed, W.M., The effects of computer-based writing tasks and mode of discourse on the performance and attitudes of writers of varying abilities. Computers in Human Behavior 8 (1992), 97–119.
61. nd ed., 1999, Free Association Books, New York.
62. Russell, B., Power: A new social analysis. 1938, Allen and Unwin, London.
63. rd ed., 2016, Sage, London.
64. Selwyn, N., The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (2007), 83–94.
65. Selwyn, N., Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (2010), 65–73.
66. Shi, X., Gender, identity and intercultural transformation in second language socialization. Language and Intercultural Communication 6:1 (2006), 2–17.
67. Shin, C., Riazantseva, A., Reader identity: A case study of Korean graduate students' meaning construction of an L2 literary text. Language and Intercultural Communication 15:4 (2015), 600–615.
68. Simon, B., Oakes, P., Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination. Human Relations 59:1 (2006), 105–139.
69. de Smet, M.J.R., Broekkamp, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., Kirschner, P.A., Effects of electronic outlining on students' argumentative writing performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27:6 (2011), 557–574.
70. Stein, P., Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: Representation, rights and resources. 2008, Routledge, London.
71. Thomas, H., The new literacies? The challenges of hypertextual discourse. Computer Assisted Language Learning 10:5 (1997), 479–489.
72. Tracy, S.J., Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-Tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16:10 (2010), 837–851.
73. Twining, P., Heller, R.S., Nussbaum, M., Tsai, C.C., Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education 106 (2017), A1–A9.
74. Unsworth, L., Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education. 2008, Continuum, New York.
75. van Leeuwen, T., Introducing social semiotics. 2005, Routledge, London.
76. Walsh, M., Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 33:3 (2010), 211–239.
77. Wang, Y.H., Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based materials to support writing activities. Computers & Education 113 (2017), 162–176.
78. Warschauer, M., Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly 32:4 (1998), 757–761.
79. Weedon, C., Feminist practice and post-structuralist theory. 2nd ed., 1997, Blackwell, Oxford.
80. Wegerif, R., McLaren, B.M., Chamrada, M., Scheuer, O., Mansour, N., Mikšátko, J., et al. Exploring creative thinking in graphically mediated synchronous dialogues. Computers & Education 54 (2010), 613–621.
81. Zaini, A., Mazdayasna, G., The effect of computer assisted language learning on the development of EFL learners' writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014), 1975–1982.
82. Zaini, A., Mazdayasna, G., The impact of computer-based instruction on the development of EFL learners' writing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31 (2015), 516–528.
83. Zipf, R., A bricoleur approach to navigating the methodological maze. Danaher, P., Dervin, F., Dyer, C., Kenny, M., Harreveld, B., Singh, M., (eds.) Palgrave studies in education research methods, 2016, McMillan Publishers, London, 59–72.