Diagnostic yield is not influenced by the timing of screening endoscopy: morning versus afternoon

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 365-369

  Xu, Ying ^a   Chen, Ke ^b   Xu, Lantao ^a   Yuan, Xiaoqin ^a   Wu, Yunlin ^a   Chen, Ping ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY SHANGHAI CANCER CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

adenoma detection rate; colorectal cancer; endoscopist fatigue; polyp detection rate; Screening colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGE; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; CHINESE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIME FACTOR; ADENOMA; AGED; CHINA; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FATIGUE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ADENOMA; AGED; CHINA; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGISTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85041236904     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: 15027708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1433230     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315:2564–2575.
2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.
3. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut. 2001;48:812–815.
4. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A., Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:904–910.
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906.
6. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:S16–S28.
7. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL., Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6: 1091–1098.
8. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterology. 2002;97:1296–1308.
9. Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, et al. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1659–1664.
10. Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM., Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran’s Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1217–1223.
11. Munson GW, Harewood GC, Francis DL., Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-hour shift schedule. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:467–475.
12. Lee A, Iskander JM, Gupta N, et al. Queue position in the endoscopic schedule impacts effectiveness of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1457–1465.
13. Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Bhansali A, et al. Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:554–560.
14. Burt RW, Cannon JA, David DS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:1538–1575.
15. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350.
16. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:34–41.
17. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803.
18. Freedman JS, Harari DY, Bamji ND, et al. The detection of premalignant colon polyps during colonoscopy is stable throughout the workday. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1197–1206.
19. Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, et al. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:827–834.
20. Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, et al. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106: 1466–1471.
21. Overholt BF, Brooks-Belli L, Grace MG, et al. Evaluating screening age for colonoscopy: a quality assurance assessment. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:e147–e153.
22. Penn E, Garrow D, Romagnuolo J., Influence of race and sex on prevalence and recurrence of colon polyps. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1127–1132.