Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 106, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1466-1471

  Gurudu, Suryakanth R ^a   Ratuapli, Shiva K ^a   Leighton, Jonathan A ^a   Heigh, Russell I ^a   Crowell, Michael D ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLON ADENOMA; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 85027937542     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.125     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Burt RW. Colorectal cancer screening. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26: 466-70.
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300.
3. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: S16-28.
4. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-803.
5. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1091-8.
6. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-308. (Pubitemid 34664769)
7. Peters SL, Hasan AG, Jacobson NB et al. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8 : 439-42.
8. Rogart JN, Siddiqui UD, Jamidar PA et al. Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2841-6.
9. Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN et al. Adenomas are detected more oft en in morning than in aft ernoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1659-64; quiz 1665.
10. Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen KD et al. Aft ernoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2726-30. (Pubitemid 44902643)
11. Wells CD, Heigh RI, Sharma VK et al. Comparison of morning vs. aft ernoon cecal intubation rates. BMC Gastroenterol 2007; 7: 19.
12. Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM. Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran's Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1217-23; quiz 1143.
13. Overholt BF, Brooks-Belli L, Grace MG et al. Evaluating screening age for colonoscopy: a quality assurance assessment. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: e147-53.
14. Penn E, Garrow D, Romagnuolo J. Influence of race and sex on prevalence and recurrence of colon polyps. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1127-32.
15. Cheskin LJ, Prosser BJ. Obesity and the risk of colon polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 229-30. (Pubitemid 46340741)
16. Siddiqui A, Pena Sahdala HN, Nazario HE et al. Obesity is associated with an increased prevalence of advanced adenomatous colon polyps in a male veteran population. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1560-4.
17. Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A et al. Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 527-30.
18. Schieman C, MacLean AR, Buie WD et al. Does surgeon fatigue Influence outcomes aft er anterior resection for rectal cancer? Am J Surg 2008; 195: 684-7; discussion 687-688.
19. West CP, Tan AD, Habermann TM et al. Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA 2009; 302: 1294-300.