Time of day variation in polyp detection rate for colonoscopies performed on a 3-hour shift schedule

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 467-475

  Munson, Gregory W ^a   Harewood, Gavin C ^b   Francis, Dawn L ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

adenoma detection rate; ADR; Mayo Clinic Rochester; Mayo Electronic Record for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; MCR; MERGE; PDR; polyp detection rate; withdrawal time; WT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

ADENOMA; AGED; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLON; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79952045696     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.025     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:627-37.
2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:130-60.
3. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:739-50.
4. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001;48:812-5. (Pubitemid 32476984)
5. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy: a case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:904-10.
6. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al; The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81. (Pubitemid 24015040)
7. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:352-9.
8. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8. (Pubitemid 27008981)
9. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Saskin R. Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:275-9.
10. Rogart JN, Siddiqui UD, Jamidar PA, et al. Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:2841-6.
11. Peters SL, Hasan AG, Jacobson NB, et al. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:439-42.
12. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1941-5. (Pubitemid 39421236)
13. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
14. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:965-71. (Pubitemid 44326377)
15. Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A, et al. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:166-71.
16. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1091-8.
17. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N, et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time ≥ 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1892-8.
18. Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen KD, et al. Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2726-30. (Pubitemid 44902643)
19. Wells CD, Heigh RI, Sharma VK, et al. Comparison of morning versus afternoon cecal intubation rates. BMC Gastroenterol 2007;7:19.
20. Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, et al. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:1659-64;quiz 1665.
21. Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM. Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran's Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:1217-23.
22. Ford AC, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Rodgers CC, et al. Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: systematic review and metaanalysis. Gut 2008;57:1545-53.
23. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76-9. (Pubitemid 38208751)
24. Harewood GC, Chrysostomou K, Himy N, et al. Impact of operator fatigue on endoscopy performance: implications for procedure scheduling. Dig Dis Sci 2009;54:1656-61.
25. Chen SC, Rex DK. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:704-7.