Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks

Bioinformatics

Volumn 33, Issue 16, 2017, Pages 2539-2546

  Shaham, Uri ^a   Stanton, Kelly P ^a,b   Zhao, Jun ^a   Li, Huamin ^a   Raddassi, Khadir ^b   Montgomery, Ruth ^b   Kluger, Yuval ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CYTOPHOTOMETRY; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYTOPHOTOMETRY; DATA ACCURACY; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85040695740     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx196     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dziugaite,G.K. et al. (2015). Training generative neural networks via maximum mean discrepancy optimization. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence-Proceedings of the 31st Conference. UAI 2015, 258–267.
2. Finck,R. et al. (2013) Normalization of mass cytometry data with bead standards. Cytometry Part A, 83, 483–494.
3. Glorot,X., and Bengio,Y. (2010) Understanding the difficulty of training deep feed-forward neural networks. In Proceedings of AISTATS, Sardinia, Italy, vol 9, pp. 249–256.
4. Gretton,A. et al. (2006) A kernel method for the two-sample-problem. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 513–520.
5. Gretton,A. et al. (2012) A kernel two-sample test. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 13, 723–773.
6. Hahne,F. et al. (2010) Per-channel basis normalization methods for flow cytometry data. Cytometry Part A, 77, 121–131.
7. Hardt,M. and Ma,T. (2016). Identity matters in deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.04231.
8. Hastie,T. et al. (2015). pamr: Pam: prediction analysis for microarrays. R package version 1.55.2014, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pamr.
9. He,K. et al. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778.
10. He,K. et al. (2016). Identity mappings in deep residual networks. European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 630–645.
11. Ioffe,S., and Szegedy,C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-15), pp. 448–456.
12. Jaitin,D.A. et al. (2014) Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science, 343, 776–779.
13. Johnson,W.E. et al. (2007) Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical bayes methods. Biostatistics, 8, 118–127.
14. Kleinsteuber,K. et al. (2016) Standardization and quality control for high-dimensional mass cytometry studies of human samples. Cytometry A, 89, 903–913.
15. Leek,J.T. et al. (2012) The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics, 28, 882–883.
16. Leek,J.T. et al. (2010) Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 733–739.
17. Leek,J.T., and Storey,J.D. (2007) Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet., 3, e161.
18. Li,S. et al. (2016). Demystifying resnet. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01186.
19. Li,Y. et al. (2015). Generative moment matching networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, pp. 1718–1727.
20. Liu,Q., and Markatou,M. (2016) Evaluation of methods in removing batch effects on rna-seq data. Infect. Dis. Transl. Med., 2, 3–9.
21. Macosko,E.Z. et al. (2015) Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell, 161, 1202–1214.
22. Nygaard,V. et al. (2016) Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences May lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analy-ses. Biostatistics, 17, 29–39.
23. Picelli,S. et al. (2013) Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods, 10, 1096–1098.
24. Shekhar,K. et al. (2016) Comprehensive classification of retinal bipolar neurons by single-cell transcriptomics. Cell, 166, 1308–1323.
25. Spitzer,M.H., and Nolan,G.P. (2016) Mass cytometry: Single cells, many features. Cell, 165, 780–791.
26. Tieleman,T., and Hinton,G. (2012) Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: Neural Networks for Machine Learning, vol. 4, pp. 26–31.
27. Vincent,P. et al. (2008). Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1096–1103. ACM.