The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 155, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 1843-1852

  Rogers, Luke J ^a   Bleetman, David ^b   Messenger, David E ^c   Joshi, Natasha A ^c   Wood, Lesley ^c   Rasburn, Neil J ^c   Batchelor, Timothy J P ^c  

^a DERRIFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS); Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP); fast track surgery; lung cancer; thoracic surgery

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DETERIORATION; ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LOBECTOMY; LUNG CANCER; LUNG RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIMARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; REOPERATION; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; ADVERSE EVENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; ENGLAND; FACTUAL DATABASE; LUNG TUMOR; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; PNEUMONECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85040509331     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.151     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cancer Research UK. Lung cancer mortality statistics. 2014. Available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/lung-cancer#heading-Zero. Accessed January 1, 2018.
2. American Cancer Society. Lung and bronchus cancer at a glance. 2017. Available at: https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/. Accessed January 1, 2018.
3. Royal College of Physicians. Lung Cancer Clinical Outcomes Publication 2016 (for the 2014 Audit Period). 2016, RCP, London.
4. Chen, F.F., Zhang, D., Wang, Y.L., Xiong, B., Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open lobectomy in patients with clinical stage non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 39 (2013), 957–963.
5. Phillips, J.D., Merkow, R.P., Sherman, K.L., DeCamp, M.M., Bentrem, D.J., Bilimoria, K.Y., Factors affecting selection of operative approach and subsequent short-term outcomes after anatomic resection for lung cancer. J Am Coll Surg 215 (2012), 206–215.
6. Kehlet, H., Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78 (1997), 606–617.
7. Wilmore, D.W., Kehlet, H., Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322 (2001), 473–476.
8. Kehlet, H., Wimore, D.W., Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183 (2002), 630–641.
9. Fearon, K.C.H., Lljungqvist, O., Von Meyenfeldt, M., Revhaug, A., Dejong, C.H.C., Lassen, K., et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24 (2005), 466–477.
10. Nicholson, A., Lowe, M.C., Parker, J., Lewis, S.R., Alderson, P., Smith, A.F., Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101 (2014), 172–188.
11. Paton, F., Chambers, D., Wilson, P., Eastwood, A., Craig, D., Fox, D., et al. Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open, 4, 2014, e005015.
12. Lee, L., Mata, J., Ghitulescu, G.A., Boutros, M., Charlebois, P., Stein, B., et al. Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262 (2015), 1026–1033.
13. Cerfolio, R.J., Pickens, A., Bass, C., Katholi, C., Fast-tracking pulmonary resections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122 (2001), 318–324.
14. Salati, M., Brunelli, A., Xiume, F., Refai, M., Pompili, C., Sabbatini, A., Does fast-tracking increase the readmission rate after pulmonary resection? A case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41 (2012), 1083–1087.
15. Padilla Alarcón, J., Peñalver Cuesta, J.C., Experience with lung resection in a fast-track surgery program. Arch Bronconeumol 49 (2013), 89–93.
16. Muehling, B.M., Halter, G.L., Schelzig, H., Meirerhenrich, R., Steffen, P., Sunder-Plassman, L., et al. Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using fast track clinical pathway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34 (2008), 174–180.
17. Das-Neves-Pereira, J.C., Fast-track rehabilitation for lung cancer lobectomy: a five-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36 (2009), 383–392.
18. Madani, A., Fiore, J.F., Wang, Y., Bejjani, J., Sivakumaran, L., Mata, J., et al. An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery 158 (2015), 899–910.
19. Scarci, M., Solli, P., Bedetti, B., Enhanced recovery pathway for thoracic surgery in the UK. J Thorac Dis 8:Suppl 1 (2016), S78–S83.
20. Giménez-Milà M., Klein, A.A., Martinez, G., Design and implementation of an enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 8:Suppl 1 (2016), S37–S45.
21. Elm von, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., Gøtzsche, P.C., Vandenbroucke, J.P., STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guideline for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61 (2008), 344–349.
22. Gianotti, L., Biffi, R., Sandini, M., Marrelli, D., Vignali, A., Caccialanza, R., et al. Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate Load Versus Placebo in Major Elective Abdominal Surgery (PROCY). Ann Surg, June 2, 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
23. Yeung, J.H., Gates, S., Naidu, B.V., Wilson, M.J., Gao Smith, F., Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, 2016, CD009121.
24. Baidya, D.K., Khanna, P., Maitra, S., Analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral and epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 18 (2014), 626–635.
25. Cerfolio, R.J., Bryant, A.S., Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135 (2008), 269–273.
26. Bjerregaard, L.S., Jensen, K., Petersen, R.H., Hansen, H.J., Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 45 (2014), 241–246.
27. Gustafsson, U.O., Hausel, J., Thorell, A., Ljungqvist, O., Soop, M., Nygren, J., Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146 (2011), 571–577.
28. ERAS Compliance Group. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261 (2015), 1153–1159.
29. Puri, V., Patel, A.P., Crabtree, T.D., Bell, J.M., Broderick, S.R., Kreisel, D., et al. Unexpected readmission after lung cancer surgery: a benign event?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150 (2015), 1496–1504.
30. Zhuang, C.L., Huang, D.D., Chen, F.F., Zhou, C.J., Zheng, B.S., Chen, B.C., et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 29 (2015), 2091–2100.
31. Bendixen, M., Jørgensen, O.D., Kronberg, C., Andersen, C., Licht, P.B., Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17 (2016), 836–844.
32. Falcoz, P.-E., Puyraveau, M., Thomas, P.-A., Decaluwe, H., Hürtgen, M., Petersen, R.H., et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon database. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 49 (2016), 602–609.
33. Agostini, P.J., Naidu, B., Rajesh, P., Steyn, R., Bishay, E., Kalkat, M., et al. Potentially modifiable factors contribute to limitation in physical activity following thoracotomy and lung resection: a prospective observational study. J Cardiothorac Surg, 9, 2014, 128.
34. Caastelino, T., Fiore, J.F., Niculiseanu, P., Landry, T., Augustin, B., Feldman, L.S., The effect of early mobilization protocols on postoperative outcomes following abdominal and thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 159 (2016), 991–1003.
35. Pompili, C., Detterbeck, F., Papagiannopoulos, K., Sihoe, A., Vachlas, K., Maxfield, M.W., et al. Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems. Ann Thorac Surg 98 (2014), 490–496.
36. Fiore, J.F., Bejjani, J., Conrad, K., Niculiseanu, P., Landry, T., Lee, L., et al. Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151 (2016), 708–715.