Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: A rapid evidence synthesis

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Paton, Fiona ^a   Chambers, Duncan ^a   Wilson, Paul ^a   Eastwood, Alison ^a   Craig, Dawn ^a   Fox, Dave ^a   Jayne, David ^b   McGinnes, Erika ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLON SURGERY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONVALESCENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA SYNTHESIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER SURGERY; MEDLINE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS SURGERY; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SURGERY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; ECONOMICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904634726     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005015     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Øvretveit J. Does improving quality save money? A review of evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs for health service providers. London: The Health Foundation, 2009.
2. Øvretveit J. Does improving care coordination save money: a review of research. London: The Health Foundation, 2011.
3. Kehlet H, Slim K. The future of fast-track surgery. Br J Surg 2012;99:1025-6.
4. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme. Delivering enhanced recovery-helping patients to get better sooner after surgery. London: Department of Health, 2010.
5. Sturm L, Cameron AL. Brief review: fast-track surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Melbourne: Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical (ASERNIP-S), 2009 Contract No:3.
6. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 2011;149:830-40.
7. Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols - compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:1045-51.
8. Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, et al. A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB (Oxford) 2013;15:245-51.
9. Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J Surg 2013;37:1909-18.
10. Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts M-A, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:2321-9.
11. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, et al. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:1119-31.
12. Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, et al. Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:318-26.
13. Khan S, Wilson T, Ahmed J, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery protocols. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:1175-82.
14. Lemmens L, van Zelm R, Borel Rinkes I, et al. Clinical and organizational content of clinical pathways for digestive surgery: a systematic review. Dig Surg 2009;26:91-9.
15. Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, et al. A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:583-8.
16. Spanjersberg Willem R, Reurings J, Keus F, et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of Sys Rev 2011;16(2):CD007635.
17. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010;29:434-40.
18. Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, et al. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:344-53.
19. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 2006;93:800-9. (Pubitemid 44035251)
20. Lu D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD008239b.
21. Lv L, Shao YF, Zhou YB. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:1549-54.
22. Chen Hu J, Xin Jiang L, Cai L, et al. Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1830-9.
23. Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, et al. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2012;36:2879-87.
24. Garcia-Botello S, Canovas de Lucas R, Tornero C, et al. Implementation of a perioperative multimodal rehabilitation protocol in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study. Cir Esp 2011;89:159-66.
25. Ionescu D, Iancu C, Ion D, et al. Implementing fast-track protocol for colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2009;33:2433-8.
26. Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, et al. Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:21-8.
27. Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Berridge K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg 2013;100:482-9.
28. Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Wang ZM, et al. Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010;34:313-21.
29. Ren L, Zhu D, Wei Y, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2012;36:407-14.
30. Wang D, Kong Y, Zhong B, et al. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized comparison with conventional postoperative care. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:620-7.
31. Wang G, Jiang ZW, Xu J, et al. Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:671-6.
32. Wang Q, Suo J, Jiang J, et al. Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:1009-13.
33. Yang DJ, Zhang S, He WL, et al. Fast track surgery accelerates the recovery of postoperative insulin sensitivity. Chin Med J 2012;125:3261-5.
34. Yang DJ, Zhang S, He WL, et al. Fast-track surgery accelerates the recovery of postoperative humoral immune function in elective operation for colorectal carcinoma: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Chin Med J 2012;92:1112-15.
35. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 2011;254:868-75.
36. Cheng-Le Z, Xing-Zhao Y, Xiao-Dong Z, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:667-78.
37. Arsalani-Zadeh R, Elfadl D, Yassin N, et al. Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 2011;98:181-96.
38. Hoffmann H, Kettelhack C. Fast-track surgery - conditions and challenges in postsurgical treatment: a review of elements of translational research in enhanced recovery after surgery. Eur Surg Res 2012;49:24-34.
39. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme Case Studies 2011: Gynaecology: Addenbrookes Hospital.
40. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme Case Studies 2011: Enhanced Recovery Programme: Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
41. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme Case Studies 2011: Enhanced recovery for colorectal surgery: Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
42. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme Case Studies 2011: Colorectal, Gynaecology, Urology, MSK: Medway NHS Foundation Trust.
43. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme Case Studies 2011: Colorectal surgery (all elective procedures) and most major emergencies from decision to treat surgically: Royal Berkshire Hospital.
44. Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme Case Studies 2011: Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: Royal Berkshire Hospital.
45. Aylin P, Alexandrescu R, Jen MH, et al. Day of week of procedure and 30 day mortality for elective surgery: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 2013;346:8.
46. Blazeby JM, Soulsby M, Winstone K, et al. A qualitative evaluation of patients' experiences of an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2010;12(10 Online):e236-42.
47. Taylor C, Burch J. Feedback on an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal surgery. Br J Nurs 2011;20:286-90.
48. Reilly KA, Beard DJ, Barker KL, et al. Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 2005;12:351-7. (Pubitemid 41247988)
49. Archibald LH, Ott MJ, Gale CM, et al. Enhanced recovery after colon surgery in a community hospital system. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:840-5.
50. Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A, et al. A programme of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 2010;123:61-70.
51. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, et al. The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:506-13. (Pubitemid 43834456)
52. Nielsen PR, Andreasen J, Asmussen M, et al. Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:209. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/209
53. Jakobsen DH, Sonne E, Andreasen J, et al. Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:683-7. (Pubitemid 44363592)
54. McBride N, Farringdon F, Midford R. Implementing a school drug education programme: reflections on fidelity. Int J Health Promot Educ 2002;40:40-50. (Pubitemid 34649477)
55. Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a fast track postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:137-46. (Pubitemid 46227209)
56. Salhiyyah K, Elsobky S, Raja S, et al. A clinical and economic evaluation of fast-track recovery after cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2011;14:E330-4.
57. Yanatori M, Tomita S, Miura Y, et al. Feasibility of the fast-track recovery program after cardiac surgery in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;55:445-9. (Pubitemid 350112797)
58. Noyes J, Gough D, Lewin S, et al. A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:1262-70.
59. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, et al. Enhanced Recovery Program in Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. World J Surg 2014;38:1531-41.
60. Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg 2014;101:159-71.
61. Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 2014;101:172-88.
62. Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, et al. A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 18 Mar 2014. Epub ahead of print.
63. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Chaired by Robert Francis QC). London: The Stationery Office, 2013.
64. Lee L, Li C, Landry T, et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2014;259:670-6.
65. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, et al. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007;2:40.
66. Coolsen MME, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies: supplementary material. World J Surg 2013;37:1909-18.