Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial

The Lancet Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 836-844

  Bendixen, Morten ^a   Jørgensen, Ole Dan ^a   Kronborg, Christian ^b   Andersen, Claus ^a   Licht, Peter Bjørn ^a,b  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; EARLY CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LOBECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; PAIN INTENSITY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LUNG RESECTION; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PNEUMONECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; THORACOTOMY;

EID: 84965013507     PISSN: 14702045     EISSN: 14745488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1 Whitson, BA, Andrade, RS, Boettcher, A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 83 (2007), 1965–1970.
2. 2 Hanna, WC, de Valence, M, Atenafu, EG, et al. Is video-assisted lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer oncologically equivalent to open lobectomy?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43 (2013), 1121–1125.
3. 3 Yan, TD, Black, D, Bannon, PG, McCaughan, BC, Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27 (2009), 2553–2562.
4. 4 Cao, C, Manganas, C, Ang, SC, Peeceeyen, S, Yan, TD, Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 16 (2013), 244–249.
5. 5 Kirby, TJ, Mack, MJ, Landreneau, RJ, Rice, TW, Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109 (1995), 997–1001.
6. 6 Sugi, K, Kaneda, Y, Esato, K, Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg 24 (2000), 27–30.
7. 7 Craig, SR, Leaver, HA, Yap, PL, Pugh, GC, Walker, WS, Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20 (2001), 455–463.
8. 8 Long, H, Lin, ZC, Lin, YB, Situ, DR, Wang, YN, Rong, TH, Quality of life after lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer—video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus minimal incision thoracotomy. Ai Zheng 26 (2007), 624–628 (in Chinese).
9. 9 Long, H, Lin, ZC, Situ, DR, et al. Cytokine responses after lobectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and minimal incision thoracotomy. Ai Zheng 26 (2007), 991–995 (in Chinese).
10. 10 Shigemura, N, Akashi, A, Nakagiri, T, Ohta, M, Matsuda, H, Complete versus assisted thoracoscopic approach: a prospective randomized trial comparing a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy techniques. Surg Endosc 18 (2004), 1492–1497.
11. 11 McKenna, RJ Jr, Houck, W, Fuller, CB, Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006), 421–425.
12. 12 Licht, PB, Ladegaard, L, Flexible thoracoscopy may facilitate video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. World J Surg 34 (2010), 1470–1474.
13. 13 EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16 (1990), 199–208.
14. 14 Aaronson, NK, Ahmedzai, S, Bergman, B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85 (1993), 365–376.
15. 15 Brooks, R, EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37 (1996), 53–72.
16. 16 Szende, A, Janssen, B, Cabases, J, (eds.) Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D, 1st edn., 2014, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
17. 17 Gerbershagen, HJ, Rothaug, J, Kalkman, CJ, Meissner, W, Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth 107 (2011), 619–626.
18. 18 Akter, F, Routledge, T, Toufektzian, L, Attia, R, In minor and major thoracic procedures is uniport superior to multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 20 (2015), 550–555.
19. 19 Aoki, T, Tsuchida, M, Hashimoto, T, Saito, M, Koike, T, Hayashi, J, Quality of life after lung cancer surgery: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Heart Lung Circ 16 (2007), 285–289.
20. 20 Balduyck, B, Hendriks, J, Lauwers, P, Van Schil, P, Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients. Lung Cancer 56 (2007), 423–431.
21. 21 Förster, R, Storck, M, Schäfer, JR, Hönig, E, Lang, G, Liewald, F, Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy: a prospective comparison of trauma and quality of life. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387 (2002), 32–36.
22. 22 Handy, JR Jr, Asaph, JW, Douville, EC, Ott, GY, Grunkemeier, GL, Wu, Y, Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer provide improved functional outcomes compared with open lobectomy?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37 (2010), 451–455.
23. 23 Li, WW, Lee, TW, Lam, SS, et al. Quality of life following lung cancer resection: video-assisted thoracic surgery vs thoracotomy. Chest 122 (2002), 584–589.
24. 24 Cao, C, Manganas, C, Ang, SC, Yan, TD, A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1 (2012), 16–23.
25. 25 Whitson, BA, Groth, SS, Duval, SJ, Swanson, SJ, Maddaus, MA, Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 86 (2008), 2008–2016.
26. 26 Taioli, E, Lee, DS, Lesser, M, Flores, R, Long-term survival in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs open lobectomy in lung-cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44 (2013), 591–597.
27. 27 Zhang, Z, Zhang, Y, Feng, H, et al. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than thoracotomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44 (2013), 407–414.
28. 28 Chen, FF, Zhang, D, Wang, YL, Xiong, B, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open lobectomy in patients with clinical stage non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 39 (2013), 957–963.
29. 29 Li, Z, Liu, H, Li, L, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer: a meta-analysis of long-term outcomes. Exp Ther Med 3 (2012), 886–892.
30. 30 Cai, YX, Fu, XN, Xu, QZ, Sun, W, Zhang, N, Thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e82366.