Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 151, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 708-715.e6

  Fiore, Julio F ^a   Bejjani, Jimmy ^a   Conrad, Kate ^a   Niculiseanu, Petru ^a   Landry, Tara ^b   Lee, Lawrence ^a   Ferri, Lorenzo E ^a   Feldman, Liane S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

lobectomy; lung cancer surgery; outcomes; perioperative care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOSIS; CINAHL; CLINICAL PATHWAY; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONVALESCENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMBASE; ENHANCED RECOVERY PATHWAY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG RESECTION; MEDLINE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCOPUS; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEB OF SCIENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL READMISSION; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REHABILITATION; RISK FACTOR; TIME FACTOR;

COST SAVINGS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; PATIENT READMISSION; PATIENT SELECTION; PNEUMONECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84958644560     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.112     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. M. Salati, M. Refai, C. Pompili, F. Xiumè, A. Sabbatini, and A. Brunelli Major morbidity after lung resection: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database system and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system J Thorac Dis 5 2013 217 222
2. M.S. Allen, G.E. Darling, T.T. Pechet, J.D. Mitchell, J.E. Herndon II, R.J. Landreneau, and et al. Morbidity and mortality of major pulmonary resections in patients with early-stage lung cancer: initial results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial Ann Thorac Surg 81 2006 1013 1019
3. K. Irshad, L.S. Feldman, V.F. Chu, J.F. Dorval, G. Baslaim, and J.E. Morin Causes of increased length of hospitalization on a general thoracic surgery service: a prospective observational study Can J Surg 45 2002 264 268
4. J.J.R. Handy, J.W. Asaph, L. Skokan, C.E. Reed, S. Koh, G. Brooks, and et al. What happens to patients undergoing lung cancer surgery?: outcomes and quality of life before and after surgery Chest 122 2002 21 30
5. L. Lee, J. Mata, G.A. Ghitulescu, M. Boutros, P. Charlebois, B. Stein, and et al. Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery Ann Surg November 3, 2014 [Epub ahead of print]
6. H. Kehlet, and D.W. Wilmore Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery Ann Surg 248 2008 189 198
7. F. Paton, D. Chambers, P. Wilson, A. Eastwood, D. Craig, D. Fox, and et al. Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis BMJ Open 4 2014 e005015
8. A. Nicholson, M.C. Lowe, J. Parker, S.R. Lewis, P. Alderson, and A.F. Smith Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients Br J Surg 101 2014 172 188
9. M.D. Patton, and R. Schaerf Thoracotomy, critical pathway, and clinical outcomes Cancer Pract 3 1995 286 294
10. A.S. Bryant, and R.J. Cerfolio The analysis of a prospective surgical database improves postoperative fast-tracking algorithms after pulmonary resection J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 1173 1179
11. R.J. Cerfolio, A. Pickens, C. Bass, and C. Katholi Fast-tracking pulmonary resections J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122 2001 318 324
12. R.J. McKenna Jr., A. Mahtabifard, A. Pickens, D. Kusuanco, and C.B. Fuller Fast-tracking after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy Ann Thorac Surg 84 2007 1663 1667
13. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P.C. Gotzsche, J.P.A. Ioannidis, and et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 339 2009 b2700
14. D. Chambers, F. Paton, P. Wilson, A. Eastwood, D. Craig, D. Fox, and et al. An overview and methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery BMJ Open 4 2014 e005014
15. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed October 6, 2015.
16. J. Savovic, L. Weeks, J. Sterne, L. Turner, D. Altman, D. Moher, and et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation Syst Rev 3 2014 37
17. K.J. Zehr, P.B. Dawson, S.C. Yang, and R.F. Heitmiller Standardized clinical care pathways for major thoracic cases reduce hospital costs Ann Thorac Surg 66 1998 914 919
18. C.D. Wright, J.C. Wain, H.C. Grillo, A.C. Moncure, S.M. Macaluso, and D.J. Mathisen Pulmonary lobectomy patient care pathway: a model to control cost and maintain quality Ann Thorac Surg 64 1997 299 302
19. M. Salati, A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Refai, C. Pompili, and A. Sabbatini Does fast-tracking increase the readmission rate after pulmonary resection? A case-matched study Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41 2012 1083 1087
20. R.C. Numan, H.M. Klomp, W. Li, D.R. Buitelaar, J.A. Burgers, J.W. Van Sandick, and et al. A clinical audit in a multidisciplinary care path for thoracic surgery: an instrument for continuous quality improvement Lung Cancer 78 2012 270 275
21. B.M. Muehling, G.L. Halter, H. Schelzig, R. Meierhenrich, P. Steffen, L. Sunder-Plassmann, and et al. Reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung surgery using a fast track clinical pathway Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34 2008 174 180
22. R. Maruyama, T. Miyake, M. Kojo, Y. Aoki, R. Suemitsu, T. Okamoto, and et al. Establishment of a clinical pathway as an effective tool to reduce hospitalization and charges after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54 2006 387 390
23. P. Lang, M. Manickavasagar, C. Burdett, T. Treasure, and F. Fiorentino Suction on chest drains following lung resection: evidence and practice are not aligned Eur J Cardiothorac Surg April 12, 2015 [Epub ahead of print]
24. R.J. Cerfolio, and A.S. Bryant Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135 2008 269 273
25. J.M. Maessen, C.H. Dejong, A.G. Kessels, and M.F. von Meyenfeldt Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs World J Surg 32 2008 971 975
26. J. Fiore Jr., I. Faragher, A. Bialocerkowski, L. Browning, and L. Denehy Time to readiness for discharge' is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery World J Surg 37 2013 2927 2934
27. ERAS Compliance Group The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry Ann Surg 261 2015 1153 1159
28. C. Cao, C. Manganas, S.C. Ang, and T.D. Yan A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1 2012 16 23
29. D.J. Boffa, A. Dhamija, A.S. Kosinski, A.W. Kim, F.C. Detterbeck, J.D. Mitchell, and et al. Fewer complications result from a video-assisted approach to anatomic resection of clinical stage I lung cancer J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 2014 637 643
30. C.L. Zhuang, D.D. Huang, F.F. Chen, C.J. Zhou, B.S. Zheng, B.C. Chen, and et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Surg Endosc 29 2015 2091 2100
31. P.T. von Hippel The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses BMC Med Res Methodol 15 2015 35