Flow Regimes in Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-519.

Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams: Ecology and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 51-78

  Costigan, Katie H ^a   Kennard, Mark J ^b   Leigh, Catherine ^b,c,d   Sauquet, Eric ^c   Datry, Thibault ^c   Boulton, Andrew J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UR MALY   (France)

^d Domain du Petit Arbois   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Drying; Dryland rivers; Environmental management; Flow classification; Flow regime; Fluvial geomorphology; Hydrological indices; Hydrology; Intermittence

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040331010     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803835-2.00003-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (112)

1. Acreman M., Arthington A.H., Colloff M.J., Couch C., Crossman N.D., Dyer F., et al. Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12:466-473.
2. Anna A., Yorgos C., Konstantinos P., Maria L. Do intermittent and ephemeral Mediterranean rivers belong to the same river type?. Aquat. Ecol. 2009, 43:465-476.
3. Arthington A.H., Bernardo J.M., Ilhéu M. Temporary rivers: linking ecohydrology, ecological quality and reconciliation ecology. River Res. Appl. 2014, 30:1209-1215.
4. Benda L.E., Poff N.L., Tague C., Palmer M.A., Pizzuto J., Cooper S.D., et al. How to avoid train wrecks when using science in environmental problem solving. BioScience 2002, 52:1127-1136.
5. Benstead J.P., Leigh D.S. An expanded role for river networks. Nat. Geosci. 2012, 5:678-679.
6. Bhamjee R., Lindsay J.B. Ephemeral stream sensor design using state loggers. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15:1009-1021.
7. Botter G., Basso S., Rodriguez-Iturbe I., Rinaldo A. Resilience of river flow regimes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:12925-12930.
8. Boulton A.J. Over-summering refuges of aquatic macroinvertebrates in two intermittent streams in central Victoria. Trans. R. Soc. South Aust. 1989, 113:23-34.
9. Boulton A.J. Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshw. Biol. 2003, 48:1173-1185.
10. Boulton A.J., Valett H.M., Fisher S.G. Spatial distribution and taxonomic composition of the hyporheos of several Sonoran Desert streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1992, 125:37-61.
11. Brooks R.T. Potential impacts of global climate change on the hydrology and ecology of ephemeral freshwater systems of the forests of the northeastern United States. Clim. Change 2009, 95:469-483.
12. Bunn S.E., Arthington A.H. Basic principles and consequences of altered hydrological regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manag. 2002, 30:492-507.
13. Carlisle D.M., Falcone J., Wolock D.M., Meador M.R., Norris R.H. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Res. Appl. 2010, 26:118-136.
14. Caruso B.S., Haynes J. Biophysical-regulatory classification and profiling of streams across management units and ecoregions. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2011, 47:386-407.
15. Chahinian N., Tournoud M.-G., Perrin J.-L., Picot B. Flow and nutrient transport in intermittent rivers: a modelling case study on the Vène River using SWAT 2005. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2011, 56:268-287.
16. Chapin T.P., Todd A.S., Zeigler M.P. Robust, low?cost data loggers for stream temperature, flow intermittency, and relative conductivity monitoring. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50:6542-6548.
17. Cipriani T., Tilmant F., Branger F., Sauquet E., Datry T. Impact of climate change on aquatic ecosystems along the Asse River Network 2014, 463-468.
18. Constantz J., Stonestorm D., Stewart A.E., Niswonger R., Smith T.R. Analysis of streambed temperatures in ephemeral channels to determine streamflow frequency and duration. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37:317-328.
19. Corti R., Datry T. Invertebrates and sestonic matter in an advancing wetted front travelling down a dry river bed (Albarine, France). Freshw. Sci. 2012, 31:1187-1201.
20. Corti R., Datry T., Drummond L., Larned S.T. Natural variation in immersion and emersion affects breakdown and invertebrate colonization of leaf litter in a temporary river. Aquat. Sci. 2011, 73:537-550.
21. Costa A.C., Foerster S., Araújo J.C., Bronstert A. Analysis of channel transmission losses in a dryland river reach in north?eastern Brazil using streamflow series, groundwater level series and multi?temporal satellite data. Hydrol. Process. 2013, 27:1046-1060.
22. Costelloe J.F., Russell K.L. Identifying conservation priorities for aquatic refugia in an arid zone, ephemeral catchment: a hydrological approach. Ecohydrology 2014, 7:1534-1544.
23. Costelloe J.F., Grayson R.B., McMahon T.A. Modelling stream flow for use in ecological studies in a large, arid zone river, central Australia. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19:1165-1183.
24. Costigan K.H., Daniels M.D., Dodds W.K. Fundamental spatial and temporal disconnections in the hydrology of an intermittent prairie headwater network. J. Hydrol. 2015, 522:305-316.
25. Costigan K.H., Jaeger K.L., Goss C.W., Fritz K.M., Goebel P.C. Understanding controls on flow permanence in intermittent rivers to aid ecological research: integrating meteorology, geology and land cover. Ecohydrology 2016, 9:1141-1153. 10.1002/eco.1712.
26. Croke B.F.W., Jakeman A.J. Use of the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model in arid and semi-arid regions. International Hydrology Series 2007, 41-48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. H. Wheater, S. Sorooshian, K.D. Sharma (Eds.).
27. Das T., Pierce D.W., Cayan D.R., Vano J.A., Lettenmaier D.P. The importance of warm season warming to western U.S. streamflow changes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38:L23403.
28. Datry T. Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a flow intermittence gradient: effects of duration of dry events. Freshw. Biol. 2012, 57:563-574.
29. Datry T., Larned S.T., Tockner K. Intermittent rivers: a challenge for freshwater ecology. BioScience 2014, 64:229-235.
30. Datry T., Pella H., Leigh C., Bonada N., Hugueny B. A landscape approach to advance intermittent river ecology. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61:1200-1213.
31. Datry T., Moya N., Zubieta J., Oberdorff T. Determinants of local and regional communities in intermittent and perennial headwaters of the Bolivian Amazon. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61:1335-1349.
32. De Girolamo A.M., Lo Porto A., Pappagallo G., Tzoraki O., Gallart F. The hydrological status concept: application at a temporary river (Candelaro, Italy). River Res. Appl. 2015, 31:892-903.
33. De Girolamo A.M., Barca E., Ielpo P., Rulli M.C. Characterising the hydrological regime of an ungauged temporary river system: a case study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 10.1007/s11356-016-7169-0.
34. Döll P., Schmied H.M. How is the impact of climate change on river flow regimes related to the impact on mean annual runoff? A global-scale analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7:014037.
35. Doyle M.W., Stanley E.H., Strayer D.L., Jacobson R.B., Schmidt J.C. Effective discharge analysis of ecological processes in streams. Water Resour. Res. 2005, 41.
36. Eng K., Wolock D.M., Dettinger M.D. Sensitivity of intermittent streams to climate variations in the USA. River Res. Appl. 2016, 32:885-895.
37. Fleckenstein J.H., Niswonger R.G., Fogg G.E. River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management. Groundwater 2006, 44:837-852.
38. Fritz K.M., Johnson B.R., Walters D.M. Field Operations Manual for Assessing the Hydrologic Permanence and Ecological Condition of Headwater Streams 2006, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/ R-06/126 (accessed 3.11.16). http://www.epa.gov/eerd/methods/headwater.html.
39. Fritz K.M., Johnson B.R., Walters D.M. Physical indicators of hydrologic permanence in forested headwater streams. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 2008, 27:690-704.
40. Gallart F., Prat N., García-Roger E.M., Latrón J., Rieradevall M., Llorens P., et al. A novel approach to analysing the regimes of temporary streams in relation to their controls on the composition and structure of aquatic biota. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:3165-3182.
41. Gallart F., Llorens P., Latron J., Cid N., Rieradevall M., Prat N. Validating alternative methodologies to estimate the regime of temporary rivers when flow data are unavailable. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 565:1001-1010.
42. Gassman P., Reyes M., Green C., Arnold J. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2007, 50:1211-1250.
43. Gleason C.J., Smith L.C. Toward global mapping of river discharge using satellite images and at-many-stations hydraulic geometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:4788-4791.
44. Godsey S.E., Kirchner J.W. Dynamic, discontinuous stream networks: hydrologically driven variations in active drainage density, flowing channels and stream order. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 28:5791-5803.
45. Gomi T., Sidle R.C., Richardson J.S. Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. BioScience 2002, 52:905-916.
46. Gordon N., McMahon T.A., Finlayson B.L., Gippel C.J., Nathan R.J. Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists 2004, Wiley, Chichester. second ed.
47. Gungle B. Timing and duration of flow in ephemeral streams of the Sierra Vista subwatershed of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Cochise County, southeastern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-519 2007, (accessed 28.09.16) Version 2.0. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5190/.
48. Hamada Y., O'Connor B.L., Orr A.B., Wuthrich K.K. Mapping ephemeral stream networks in desert environments using very-high-spatial-resolution multispectral remote sensing. J. Arid Environ. 2016, 130:40-48.
49. Hamilton S.K., Bunn S.E., Thoms M.C., Marshall J.C. Persistence of aquatic refugia between flow pulses in a dryland river system (Cooper Creek, Australia). Limnol. Oceanogr. 2005, 50:743-754.
50. Hansen W.F. Identifying stream types and management implications. For. Ecol. Manage. 2001, 143:39-46.
51. Hobbs R.J., Higgs E., Hall C.M., Bridgewater P., Chapin F.S., Ellis E.C., et al. Managing the whole landscape: historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12:557-564.
52. Hughes J.M.R., James B. A hydrological regionalization of streams in Victoria, Australia, with implications for stream ecology. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1989, 40:303-326.
53. Ivkovic K.M., Croke B.F.W., Kelly R.A. Overcoming the challenges of using a rainfall-runoff model to estimate the impacts of groundwater extraction on low flows in an ephemeral stream. Hydrol. Res. 2014, 45:58-72.
54. Jaeger K.L., Olden J.D. Electrical resistance sensor arrays as a means to quantify longitudinal connectivity of rivers. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28:1843-1852.
55. Jaeger K.L., Olden J.D., Pelland N.A. Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:13894-13899.
56. Jencso K.G., McGlynn B.L., Gooseff M.N., Wondzell S.M., Bencala K.E., Marshall L.A. Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: transferring reach- and plot-scale understanding to the catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45.
57. Kennard M.J., Olden J.D., Arthington A.H., Pusey B.J., Poff N.L. Multi-scale effects of flow regime, habitat, and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2007, 64:1346-1359.
58. Kennard M.J., Pusey B.J., Olden J.D., Mackay S.J., Stein J.L., Marsh N. Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55:171-193.
59. Kennard M.J., Mackay S.J., Pusey B.J., Olden J.D., Marsh N. Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies. River Res. Appl. 2010, 26:137-156.
60. King A.J., Townsend S., Douglas M.M., Kennard M.J. Implications of water extraction on the low-flow hydrology and ecology of tropical savannah rivers: an appraisal for northern Australia. Freshw. Sci. 2015, 34:741-758.
61. Knighton A.D., Nanson G.C. An event-based approach to the hydrology of arid zone rivers in the channel country of Australia. J. Hydrol. 2001, 254:102-123.
62. Lake P.S. Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw. Biol. 2003, 48:1161-1172.
63. Larned S.T., Datry T., Arscott D.B., Tockner K. Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55:717-738.
64. Leigh C. Dry-season changes in macroinvertebrate assemblages of highly seasonal rivers: responses to low flow, no flow and antecedent hydrology. Hydrobiologia 2013, 703:95-112.
65. Leigh C., Datry T. Drying as a primary hydrological determinant of biodiversity in river systems: a broad-scale analysis. Ecography 2016, 10.1111/ecog.02230.
66. Leigh C., Sheldon F. Hydrological changes and ecological impacts associated with water resource development in large floodplain rivers in the Australian tropics. River Res. Appl. 2008, 24:1251-1270.
67. Leigh C., Stewart-Koster B., Sheldon F., Burford M.A. Understanding multiple ecological responses to anthropogenic disturbance: rivers and potential flow regime change. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:250-263.
68. Leigh C., Boulton A.J., Courtwright J.L., Fritz K., May C.L., Walker R.H., et al. Ecological research and management of intermittent rivers: an historical review and future directions. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61:1181-1199.
69. Marsh N., Stewardson M.J., Kennard M. River Analysis Package (RAP) 2003, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne, http://www.toolkit.net.au/tools/RAP accessed 28.09.16.
70. McDonough O.T., Hosen J.D., Palmer M.A. Temporary streams: the hydrology, geography, and ecology of non-perennially flowing waters. River Ecosystems: Dynamics 2011, 259-290. Management and Conservation. Nova Science Publishers, New York. S.E. Elliot, L.E. Martin (Eds.).
71. McKerchar A.I., Schmidt J. Decreases in low flows in the lower Selwyn River?. J. Hydrol. (New Zealand) 2007, 46:63-72.
72. McMahon T.A., Vogel R.M., Peel M.C., Pegram G.G.S. Global streamflows-Part 1: characteristics of annual streamflows. J. Hydrol. 2007, 347:243-259.
73. Meyer J.L., Wallace J.B. Lost linkages and lotic ecology: rediscovering small streams. Ecology: Achievement and Challenge 2001, 295-317. Blackwell Scientific Press, New York. M.C. Press, N. Huntly, S. Levin (Eds.).
74. Moyle P.B. Novel aquatic ecosystems: the new reality for streams in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. River Res. Appl. 2014, 30:1335-1344.
75. Nilsson C., Renöfält B.M. Linking flow regime and water quality in rivers: a challenge to adaptive catchment management. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13. Article 18.
76. Nippgen F., McGlynn B.L., Marshall L.A., Emanuel R.E. Landscape structure and climate influences on hydrologic response. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47.
77. Olden J.D., Poff N.L. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Res. Appl. 2003, 19:101-121.
78. Olden J.D., Kennard M.J., Pusey B.J. A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology. Ecohydrology 2012, 5:503-518.
79. Palmer M.A., Reidy Liermann C.A., Nilsson C., Flörke M., Alcamo J., Lake P.S., et al. Climate change and the world's river basins: anticipating management options. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6:81-89.
80. Pilgrim D.H., Chapman T.G., Doran D.G. Problems of rainfall-runoff modelling in arid and semiarid regions. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1988, 33:379-400.
81. Poff N.L. A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors. Freshw. Biol. 1996, 36:71-91.
82. Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., Karr J.R., Prestegaard K.L., Richter B.D., et al. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 1997, 47:769-784.
83. Puckridge J.T., Sheldon F., Walker K.F., Boulton A.J. Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1998, 49:55-72.
84. Puckridge J.T., Walker K.F., Costelloe J.F. Hydrological persistence and the ecology of dryland rivers. Regul. Riv. Res. Manage. 2000, 16:385-402.
85. Reinfelds I., Haeusler T., Brooks A.J., Williams S. Refinement of the wetted perimeter breakpoint method for setting cease-to-pump or minimum environmental flows. River Res. Appl. 2004, 20:671-685.
86. Reynolds L.V., Shafroth P.B. Modeled streamflow metrics on small, ungaged stream reaches in the Upper Colorado River Basin. U.S. Geol. Surv. Data Ser. 2016, 974:1-11.
87. Reynolds L.V., Shafroth P.B., Poff N.L. Modeled intermittency risk for small streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin under climate change. J. Hydrol. 2015, 523:768-780.
88. Rolls R.J., Leigh C., Sheldon F. Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems: ecological principles and consequences of alteration. Freshw. Sci. 2012, 31:1163-1186.
89. Rosado J., Morais M., Tockner K. Mass dispersal of terrestrial organisms during first flush events in a temporary stream. River Res. Appl. 2015, 31:912-917.
90. Rossouw L., Avenant M.F., Seaman M.T., King J.M., Barker C.H., du Preez P.J., et al. Environmental water requirements in non-perennial systems. WRC report no: 1414/1/05 2005, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa, accessed 3.11.16. http://www.wrc.org.za/KnowledgeHubDocuments/ResearchReports/1414.pdf.
91. Sauquet E., Gottschalk L., Krasovskaïa I. Estimating mean monthly runoff at ungauged locations: an application to France. Hydrol. Res. 2008, 39:403-423.
92. Schriever T.A., Bogan M.T., Boersma K.S., Cañedo-Argüelles M., Jaeger K.L., Olden J.D., et al. Hydrology shapes taxonomic and functional structure of desert stream invertebrate communities. Freshw. Sci. 2015, 34:399-409.
93. Seager R., Ting M., Li C., Naik N., Cook B., Nakamura J., et al. Projections of declining surface-water availability for the southwestern United States. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3:482-486.
94. Seaman M., Watson M., Avenant M., King J., Joubert A., Barker C., et al. DRIFT-ARID: a method for assessing environmental water requirements (EWRs) for non-perennial rivers. Water SA 2016, 42:356-367.
95. Sheldon F., Fellows C.S. Water quality in two Australian dryland rivers: spatial and temporal variability and the role of flow. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2010, 61:864-874.
96. Smakhtin V.U. Low flow hydrology: a review. J. Hydrol. 2001, 240:147-186.
97. Smakhtin V.Y., Toulouse M. Relationships between low-flow characteristics of South African streams. Water SA 1998, 24:107-112.
98. Snelder T.H., Datry T., Lamouroux N., Larned S.T., Sauquet E., Pella H., et al. Regionalization of patterns of flow intermittence from gauging station records. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17:2685-2699.
99. Snover A.K., Hamlet A.F., Lettenmaier D.P. Climate-change scenarios for water planning studies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2003, 84:1513-1518.
100. Stanley E.H., Fisher S.G., Grimm N.B. Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams. BioScience 1997, 47:427-435.
101. Sterling S.M., Ducharne A., Polcher J. The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3:385-390.
102. Thoms M.C., Sheldon F. Water resource development and hydrological change in a large dryland river: the Barwon-Darling River, Australia. J. Hydrol. 2000, 228:10-21.
103. Turner D.S., Richter H.E. Wet/dry mapping: using citizen scientists to monitor the extent of perennial surface flow in dryland regions. Environ. Manag. 2011, 47:497-505.
104. Tzoraki O., De Girolamo A.M., Gamvroudis C., Skoulikidis N. Assessing the flow alteration of temporary streams under current conditions and changing climate by soil and water assessment tool model. Int. J. River Basin Manage. 2016, 14:9-18.
105. Vander Vorste R., Malard F., Datry T. Is drift the primary process promoting the resilience of river invertebrate communities? A manipulative field experiment in an intermittent alluvial river. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61:1276-1292.
106. Vander Vorste R., Corti R., Sagouis A., Datry T. Invertebrate communities in gravel-bed, braided rivers are highly resilient to flow intermittence. Freshw. Sci. 2016, 35:164-177.
107. Vörösmarty C.J., Sahagian D. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. BioScience 2000, 50:753-765.
108. Walker K.F., Sheldon F., Puckridge J.T. A perspective on dryland river ecosystems. Regul. Riv. Res. Manage. 1995, 11:85-104.
109. Webb J.A., Bond N.R., Wealands S.R., Mac Nally R., Quinn G.P., Vesk P.A., et al. Bayesian clustering with AutoClass explicitly recognises uncertainties in landscape classification. Ecography 2007, 30:526-536.
110. Ye W., Bates B.C., Viney N.R., Sivapalan M., Jakeman A.J. Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding catchments. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33:153-166.
111. Larned, S.T., Arscott, D.B., Schmidt, J., Diettrich, J.C., 2010a. A framework for analysing longitudinal and temporal variation in river flow and developing flow-ecology relationships. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46, 541-553.
112. Larned, S.T., Schmidt, J., Datry, T., Konrad, C.P., Dumas, J.K., Diettrich, J.C., 2011. Longitudinal river ecohydrology: flow variation down the lengths of alluvial rivers. Ecohydrology 4, 532-548.