A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology

Ecohydrology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 503-518

  Olden, Julian D ^a   Kennard, Mark J ^b   Pusey, Bradley J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dams; Environmental flow; Flow regime; Hydrologic metric; River regulation

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION PROCESS; CONSERVATION AREAS; CRITICAL COMPONENT; DEDUCTIVE REASONING; ECO-HYDROLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; FLOW REGIMES; HYDROLOGIC DATA; HYDROLOGIC METRIC; INDUCTIVE REASONING; KEY DETERMINANTS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; PRIORITIZATION; RIVER REGULATION; SPATIAL PATTERNS; STATISTICAL APPROACH; WATERRESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

DAMS; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

HYDROLOGY;

CLASSIFICATION; DAM; ECOHYDROLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGY; METHODOLOGY; STREAMFLOW; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84856795413     PISSN: 19360584     EISSN: 19360592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eco.251     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Abell R, Allan JD, Lehner B. 2007. Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters. Biological Conservation 134: 48-63.
2. Acreman MC, Sinclair CD. 1986. Classification of drainage basins according to their physical characteristics; an application for flood frequency analysis in Scotland. Journal of Hydrology 84: 365-380.
3. Andrews DF. 1972. Plots of high dimensional data. Biometrics 28: 125 136.
4. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ. 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16: 1311-1318.
5. Assani AA, Tardif S. 2005. Classification and characterization of natural flow regimes in Quebec (Canada). Factors of spatial variability - an eco-geographical approach. Revue Des Sciences De L'Eua 18: 247-266.
6. Bailey RG. 1996. Ecosystem Geography. Springer-Verlag: New York.
7. Bejarano MD, Marchamalo M, de Jalón DG, Tánago MG. 2010. Flow regime patterns and their controlling factors in the Ebro basin (Spain). Journal of Hydrology 385: 323-335.
8. Bower D, Hannah DM, McGregor GR. 2004. Techniques for assessing the climatic sensitivity of river flow regimes. Hydrological Processes 18: 2515-2543.
9. Brizga SO, Arthington AH, Pusey BJ, Kennard MJ, Mackay SJ, Werren GL, Craigie NM, Choy SJ. 2002. Benchmarking, a 'top-down' methodology for assessing environmental flows in Australian rivers. In Proceedings of International Conference on Environmental Flows for Rivers, Cape Town, SA.
10. Bryce SA, Clarke SE. 1996. Landscape-level ecological regions: linking state-level ecoregion frameworks with stream habitat classifications. Environmental Management 20: 297-311.
11. Bunn SE, Arthington AH. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492-507.
12. Burn DH, Arnell NW. 1993. Synchronicity in global flood responses. Journal of Hydrology 144: 381-404.
13. Buttle J. 2006. Mapping first-order controls on streamflow from drainage basins: the T3 template. Hydrologic Processes 20: 3415-3422.
14. Carlisle DM, Falcone J, Wolock DM, Meador MR, Norris RH. 2010. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Research and Application 26: 118-136.
15. Chang FJ, Tsai MJ, Tsai WP, Herricks EE. 2008. Assessing the ecological hydrology of natural flow conditions in Taiwan. Journal of Hydrology 354: 75-89.
16. Chernoff H. 1973. Using faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. Journal of the American Statistics Association 68: 361-368.
17. Chiang S-M, Tsay T-K, Nix SJ. 2002. Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds I: methodology development. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management 128: 3-11.
18. Clausen B, Biggs BJF. 2000. Flow variables for ecological studies in temperate streams: groupings based on covariance. Journal of Hydrology 237: 184-197.
19. Detenbeck NE, Batterman SL, Brady VL, Brazner JC, Snarski VM, Taylor DL, Thompson J, Arthur JW. 2000. A test of watershed classification systems for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19: 1174-1181.
20. Detenbeck NE, Brady VJ, Taylor DL, Snarski VM, Batterman SL. 2005.Relationship of stream flow regime in the western Lake Superior basin to watershed type characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 309: 258-276.
21. Dettinger MD, Diaz HF. 2000. Global characteristics of stream flow seasonality and variability. Journal of Hydrometeorology 1: 289-310.
22. Everitt, BS, Landau S, Leese M. 2001. Cluster Analysis, (4th edn), Arnold: London (2001).
23. Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 1988. Australia vs. the world: a comparative analysis of streamflow characteristics. Fluvial Geomorphology of Australia, In: Werner RF (ed). Academic Press: Sydney; 17-40.
24. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edition, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida.
25. GS Australia 2006. GEODATA TOPO 250K Series 3. Shape Files Format. Commonwealth of Australia (GeoSciences Australia), Canberra, ACT, Australia.
26. Gordon A. 1987. A review of hierarchical classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). 150: 119-137.
27. Haines AT, Findlayson BL, McMahon TA. 1988. A global classification of river regimes. Applied Geography 8: 255-272.
28. Hannah DM, Smith BPG, Gurnell AM, McGregor GR. 2000. An approach to hydrograph classification. Hydrological Processes 14: 317-338.
29. Harris NM, Gurnell AM, Hannah DM, Petts GE. 2000. Classification of river regimes: a context for hydroecology. Hydrological Processes 14: 2831-2848.
30. Henriksen JA, Heasley J, Kennen JG, Niewsand S. 2006. Users' manual for the hydroecological integrity assessment process software (including the New Jersey Assessment Tools): U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Discipline, Open File Report 2006-1093, 71.
31. Hughes DA, Hannart P. 2003. A desktop model used to provide an initial estimate of the ecological instream flow requirements of rivers in South Africa. Journal of Hydrology 270: 167-181.
32. Hughes JMR. 1987. Hydrological characteristics and classification of Tasmanian rivers. Australian Geographical Studies 25: 61-82.
33. Hughes JMR, James B. 1989. A hydrological regionalization of streams in Victoria, Australia, with implications for stream ecology. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources 40: 303-326.
34. Jowett IG, Duncan MJ. 1990. Flow variability in New Zealand rivers and its relationship to in-stream habitat and biota. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 24: 305-317.
35. Kachroo RK, Mkhandi SH, Parida BP. 2000. Flood frequency analysis of southern Africa: I. Delineation of homogeneous regions. Hydrological Science 45: 437-447.
36. Kahya E, Demirel MC, Piechota TC. 2007. Spatial grouping of annual streamflow patterns in Turkey. Paper presented at Hydrology Days, Colorado State Univ. (Available at: http://hydrologydays.colostate.edu/Papers_2007/Demirel_Kahya_paper.pdf).
37. Kampichler C, Wieland R, Calmé S, Weissenberger H, Arriaga-Weiss S. 2010. Classification in conservation biology: a comparison of five machine-learning methods. Ecological Informatics 5: 441-450.
38. Kennard MJ, Olden JD, Arthington AH, Pusey BJ, Poff NL. 2007. Multi-scale effects of flow regime, habitat, and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 1346-1359.
39. Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Mackay SJ, Olden JD, Marsh N. 2010a. Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies. River Research and Applications 26: 137-156.
40. Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Olden JD, Mackay SJ, Stein JL, Marsh N. 2010b. Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshwater Biology 55: 171-193.
41. King JM, Brown CA, Sabet H. 2003. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 619-640.
42. Kohonen T. 2000. Self Organizing Maps. 3rd edition, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 521.
43. Kondolf GM. 1995. Cases studies and reviews. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: uses and limitations. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5: 127-141.
44. Kondolf GM, Montgomery DR, Piégay H, Schmitt L. 2003. Geomorphic classification of rivers and streams. Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. In GM Kondolf, H Piégay (ed). Wiley: New York; 169-202.
45. Krasovskaia I. 1997. Entropy-based grouping of river flow regimes. Journal of Hydrology 202: 173-191.
46. Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd edition, Elsevier Scientific: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 870.
47. Lin G-F, Wang C-M. 2006. Performing cluster analysis and discrimination analysis of hydrological factors in one step. Advances Water Research 29: 1573-1585.
48. Lins HF. 1997. Regional streamflow regimes and hydroclimatology of the United States. Water Resources Research 33: 1655-1667.
49. Loveland TR, Merchant JM. 2004. Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: geographical and ecological perspectives. Environmental Management 34: 1-13.
50. Lundquist JD, Cayan DR. 2002. Seasonal and spatial patterns in diurnal cycles in streamflow in the western United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology 3: 591-603.
51. Mackey BG, Berry SL, Brown T. 2007. Reconciling approaches to biogeographical regionalization: a systematic and generic framework examined with a case study of the Australian continent. Journal of Biogeography 35: 213-229.
52. Margules CR, Pressey RL, Williams PH. 2002. Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. Journal of Biosciences 27: 309-326.
53. McMahon TA, Vogel RM, Peel MC, Pegram GGS. 2007a. Global streamflows - part 1: characteristics of annual streamflows. Journal of Hydrology 347: 243-259.
54. McMahon TA, Peel MC, Vogel RM, Pegram GGS. 2007b. Global streamflows - part 3: country and climate zone characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 347: 272-291.
55. McManamay RA, Orth DJ, Dolloff CA, Frimpong EA. 2011. Regional frameworks applied to hydrology: can landscape-based frameworks capture the hydrologic variability? River Research and Applications, in press. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1535
56. Meigh JR, Farquharson FAK, Sutcliffe JV. 1997. A worldwide comparison of regional flood estimation methods and climate. Hydrology Science 42: 225-244.
57. Merz B, Bloeschl G. 2004. Regionalization of catchment model parameters. Journal of Hydrology 287: 95-123.
58. Milligan GW, Cooper MC. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters. Psychometrika 50: 159-179.
59. Mkhandi SH, Kachroo RK. 1996. Regional flood frequency analysis for southern Africa. Xiièmes Journées Hydrologiques De L'orstom.Montpellier, 10-11th October 1996.
60. Monk WA, Peters DL, Curry RA, Baird DJ. 2011. Quantifying trends in indicator hydroecological variables for regime-based groups of Canadian river. Hydrological Processes, in press. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8137
61. Monk WA, Wood PJ, Hannah DM, Wilson DA, Extence CA, Chadd RP. 2006. Flow variability and macroinvertebrate community response within riverine systems. River Research and Applications 22: 595-615.
62. Mosley MP. 1981. Delimitation of New Zealand hydrologic regions. Journal of Hydrology 49: 179-192.
63. Nathan RJ, McMahon TA. 1990. Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalization. Journal of Hydrology 121: 217-238.
64. Nel JL, Roux, DJ, Maree G, Kleynhans CJ, Moolman J, Reyers B, Rouget M, Cowling RM. 2007. Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystems. Diversity and Distributions 13: 341-352.
65. O'Keefe JH, Uys MC. 2000. The role of classification the conservation of rivers. Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Science Policy and Practice. In Boon PJ, Davies BR, Petts GE (eds). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester; 445-458
66. Olden JD, Poff NL. 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications 19: 101-121.
67. Olden JD, Lawler JJ, Poff, NL. 2008. Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. The Quarterly Review of Biology 83: 171-193.
68. Omernik JM. 2004. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environmental Management 34: S1-S13.
69. Ouarda TBMJ, Girard C, Cavadias GS, Bobee B. 2001. Regional flood frequency estimation with canonical correlation analysis. Journal of Hydrology 254: 157-173.
70. Pardé M. 1955. Fleuves et rivieres. Collection Armand Colin: Paris; 224.
71. Pegg MA, Pierce CL. 2002. Classification of reaches in the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers based on flow characteristics. River Research and Applications 18: 31-42.
72. Peterson JT, Jackson CR, Shea CP, Li G. 2009. Development and evaluation of a stream channel classification for estimating fish responses to changing streamflow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 1123-1137.
73. Poff NL. 1996. A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors. Freshwater Biology 36: 71-91.
74. Poff NL, Allan D, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47: 769-784.
75. Poff NL, Allan JD. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76: 606-627.
76. Poff NL, Olden JD, Pepin DM, Bledsoe BP. 2006. Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts. River Research and Applications 22: 149-166.
77. Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O'Keeffe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55: 147-170.
78. Puckridge JT, Sheldon F, Walker KF, Boulton AJ. 1998. Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 49: 55-72.
79. Pusey BJ, Arthington AH. 1996. Streamflow variability within the Burdekin River. Proceedings of the 23rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium. Australian Institute of Engineers, Barton; 213-220.
80. Rao AR, Srinivas VV. 2006a. Regionalization of watersheds by hybrid-cluster analysis. Journal of Hydrology 318: 37-56.
81. Rao AR, Srinivas VV. 2006b. Regionalization of watersheds by fuzzy cluster analysis. Journal of Hydrology 318: 57-79.
82. Reidy Liermann CA, Olden JD, Beechie TJ, Kennard MJ, Skidmore PB, Konrad CP, Imaki H. 2011. Hydrogeomorphic classification of Washington State rivers to support emerging environmental flow management strategies. River Research and Applications, in press. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1541
83. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 1163-1174.
84. Roberts DW. 1986. Ordination on the basis of fuzzy set theory. Vegetatio 66: 123-131.
85. Sabo JL, Post DM. 2008. Quantifying periodic, stochastic, and catastrophic environmental variation. Ecological Monographs 78: 19-40.
86. Sanborn SC, Bledsoe, BP. 2006. Predicting streamflow regime metrics for ungauged streams in Colorado, Washington, and Oregon. Journal of Hydrology 325: 241-261.
87. Santhi C, Allen PM, Muttiah RS, Arnold JG, Tuppad, P. 2008. Regional estimation of base flow for the conterminous United States by hydrologic landscape regions. Journal of Hydrology 351: 139-153.
88. Sawicz K, Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, Carrillo G. 2011. Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 8: 4495-4534.
89. Schmitt L, Maire G, Nobelis P, Humbert J. 2007. Quantitative morphodynamic typology of rivers: a methodological study based on the French Upper Rhine basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 1726-1746.
90. Smith LC, Turcotte DL, Isacks BL. 1998. Stream flow characterization and feature detection using a discrete wavelet transform. Hydrological Processes 12: 233-249.
91. Snelder TH, Biggs BJF. 2002. Multi-scale river environment classification for water resources management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 1225-1240.
92. Snelder TH, Lamouroux N. 2010. Co-variation of fish assemblages, flow regimes and other habitat factors in French rivers. Freshwater Biology 55: 881-892.
93. Snelder TH, Hughey KFD. 2005. On the use of an ecologic classification to improve water resource planning in New Zealand. Environmental Management 36: 741-756.
94. Snelder TH, Weatherhead M, Biggs BJF. 2004. Nutrient concentration criteria and characterization of patterns in trophic state for rivers in heterogeneous landscape. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40: 1-13.
95. Snelder TH, Biggs BJF, Woods RA. 2005. Improved eco-hydrological classification of rivers. River Research and Applications 21: 609-628.
96. Snelder TH, Dey KL, Leathwick JR. 2007. A procedure for making optimal selection of input variables for multivariate environmental classifications. Conservation Biology 21: 365-375.
97. Snelder TH, Lamouroux N, Leathwick JR, Pella H, Sauquet E, Shankar U. 2009a. Predictive mapping of the natural flow regimes of France. Journal of Hydrology 373: 56-67.
98. Snelder TH, Lehmann A, Lamouroux N, Leathwick JR, Allenbach K. 2009b. Strong influence of variable treatment on the performance of numerically defined ecological regions. Environmental Management 44: 658-670.
99. Snelder TH, Booker D, Lamouroux N. 2011. A method to assess and define environmental flow rules for large jurisdictional regions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, in press. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00556.x
100. Stein JL, Hutchinson MF, Pusey BJ, Kennard MJ. 2009. Ecohydrological classification based on landscape and climate data. Appendix 8. Ecohydrological Regionalisation of Australia: A Tool for Management and Science. Innovations Project GRU36, Final Report to Land and Water Australia. In: Pusey BJ, Kennard MJ, Stein JL, Olden JD, Mackay SJ, Hutchinson MF, Sheldon F (eds). Available at http://lwa.gov.au/products/pn22591.
101. Tasker GD. 1982. Comparing methods of hydrologic regionalization. Water Resources Bulletin 18: 965-970.
102. Vogel RM, Wilson I, Daly C. 1999. Regional regression models of annual streamflow for the United States. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 125: 148-157.
103. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch P, Woods R. 2007. Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity. Geography Compass 1: 1-31.
104. Ward D, Stein J, Carew R, Kennard M. 2010. Hydrosystem delineation, environmental attribution and classification. Chapter 4. Identifying High Conservation Value Aquatic Ecosystems in Northern Australia. Interim Report for the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and the National Water Commission. Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge (TRaCK) Commonwealth Environmental Research Facility, In Kennard MJ (ed). Charles Darwin University. Available at: http://track.gov.au/publications/registry/843.
105. Webb JA, Bond NR, Wealands SR, Mac Nally R, Quinn GP, Vesk PA, Grace MR. 2007. Bayesian clustering with AutoClass explicitly recognises uncertainties in landscape classification. Ecography 30: 526-536.
106. Wiltshire SE. 1986. Identification of homogeneous regions for flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology 84: 287-302.
107. Winter TC. 2001. The concept of hydrologic landscapes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 335-349.
108. Wolock DM, Winter TC, McMahon G. 2004. Delineation and evaluation of hydrologic-landscape regions in the United States using geographic information system tools and multivariate statistical analyses. Environmental Management 34: S71-S88.
109. Zhang Y, Xia J, Bunn SE, Arthington AH, Mackay S, Kennard M. 2011. Classification of flow regimes for environmental flow assessment in regulated rivers: the Huai River Basin, China. River Research and Applications, in press. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1483.
110. Zoppou C, Nielsen OM, Zhang L. 2002. Regionalization of daily stream flow in Australia using wavelets and K means analysis. CMA Research Report MRR02-003, Australian National University, Canberra. Available at: http://wwwmaths.anu.edu.au/research.reports/mrr/02/003/