River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management

Ground Water

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 837-852

  Fleckenstein, Jan H ^a,b   Niswonger, Richard G ^b,c   Fogg, Graham E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW MEASUREMENT; GROUNDWATER; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; RIVER BASIN PROJECTS; SURFACE WATERS; TEXTURES;

AQUIFER EXCHANGE; FALL FLOWS; GEOSTATISTICAL SIMULATIONS; WATER MODEL;

AQUIFERS;

ALLUVIAL PLAIN; AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HETEROGENEITY; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; NUMERICAL MODEL; RIVER; SALMONID; SEEPAGE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECOSYSTEM; ENTROPY; RIVER; SEDIMENT; UNITED STATES; WATER FLOW;

CALIBRATION; CALIFORNIA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENTROPY; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; RIVERS; WATER MOVEMENTS;

CALIFORNIA; COSUMNES RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 33750480248     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00190.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Anderman, E.R., and C.M. Hill. 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model - Documentation of the Hydrogeologic Unit Flow (HUF) package. USGS Open-File Report 00-342. USGS, Denver, CO.
2. Bruen, M.P., and Y.Z. Osman. 2004. Sensitivity of stream-aquifer seepage to spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 293, no. 4: 289-302.
3. Carle, S.F. 1999. TPROGS - Transition Probability Geostatistical Software, Version 2.1, User Manual. Davis, California: Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, University of California.
4. Carle, S.F., and G.E. Fogg. 1997. Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains. Mathematical Geology 29, no. 7: 891-918.
5. Carle, S.F., and G.E. Fogg. 1996. Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics. Mathematical Geology 28, no. 4: 453-476.
6. Carle, S.F., E.M. LaBolle, G.S. Weissmann, D. Van Brocklin, and G.E. Fogg. 1998. Conditional simulation of hydrofacies architecture:Atransition probability/Markov approach. In Hydrogeologic Models of Sedimentary Aquifers, Concepts in Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology No. 1, ed. G.S. Fraser and J.M. Davis, 147-170. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Special Publication.
7. Constantine, C.R. 2003. The effects of substrate variability and incision on the downward-fining pattern in the Cosumnes River, Central Valley, California. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Department of Geology, University of California, Davis.
8. De Marsily, G., F. Delay, V. Teles, and M.T. Schafmeister. 1998. Some current methods to represent the heterogeneity of natural media in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal 6, no. 1: 115-130.
9. Department of Water Resources - California (DWR). 1974. Evaluation of ground water resources, Sacramento County. DWR Bulletin no. 118-3. Sacramento, California: The Department of Water Resources.
10. Deutsch, C.V., and A.G. Journel. 1998. GSLIB - Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Domenico, P.A., and F.W. Schwartz. 1998. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology. New York: John Wiley.
12. Elliot, E.M. 2002. Comparative groundwater flow and transport models to investigate the effects of geologic heterogeneity. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, University of California, Davis.
13. Fleckenstein, J.H. 2004. Modeling river-aquifer interactions and geologic heterogeneity in an alluvial fan system, Cosumnes River, California. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, University of California, Davis.
14. Fleckenstein, J.H., M. Anderson, G.E. Fogg, and J. Mount. 2004. Managing surface water-groundwater to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130, no. 4: 301-310.
15. Fleckenstein, J.H., E. Suzuki, and G.E. Fogg. 2001. Options for conjunctive water management to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River basin, California. In Integrated Water Resources Management, ed. M.A. Mariño and S.P. Simonovic, 175-182. Oxfordshire, UK: International Association of Hydrologic Sciences. IAHS Publication no. 272.
16. Fogg, G.E. 1986. Groundwater flow and sand-body interconnectedness in a thick, multiple-aquifer system. Water Resources Research 22, no. 5: 679-694.
17. Gooseff, M.N., S.M. Wondzell, R. Haggerty, and J. Anderson. 2003. Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA. Advances in Water Resources 26, no. 9: 925-937.
18. Guay, J.R., J.G. Harmon, and K.R. McPherson. 1998. Flood inundation map and water-surface profiles for floods of selected recurrence intervals, Cosumnes River and Deer Creek, Sacramento County, California. USGS Open-File Report 98-283. USGS, Denver, CO.
19. Harbaugh, A.W., E.R. Banta, M.C. Hill, and M.G. McDonald. 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model - User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. USGS Open-File Report 00-92. USGS, Reston, VA.
20. Hill, M.C. 1998. Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4005. USGS, Denver, CO.
21. Kasahara, T., and S.M. Wondzell. 2003. Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams. Water Resources Research 39, no. 1: 1005.
22. Kollet, S.J., and V.A. Zlotnik. 2003. Stream depletion predictions using pumping test data from a heterogeneous stream-aquifer system (a case study from the Great Plains, USA). Journal of Hydrology 281, no. 2: 96-114.
23. Kollet, S.J., V.A. Zlotnik, and D. Woodward. 2002. A field and theoretical study on stream-aquifer interactions under pumping conditions in the Great Plains, Nebraska. In Proceedings of the Ground Water/Surface Water Interactions, AWRA 2002 Summer Specialty Conference, July 1-3, 2002, Colorado, 29-34. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, VA.
24. Koltermann, C.E., and S.M. Gorelick. 1996. Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits - A review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches. Water Resources Research 32, no. 9: 2617-2658.
25. Kondolf, G.M., L.M. Maloney, and J.G. Williams. 1987. Effects of bank storage and well pumping on base flow, Carmel River, Monterrey County, California. Journal of Hydrology 91, no. 4: 351-369.
26. LaBolle, E.M., and G.E. Fogg. 2001. Role of molecular diffusion in contaminant migration and recovery in an alluvial aquifer system. Transport in Porous Media 42, no. 1-2: 155-179.
27. Malcolm, I.A., and C. Soulsby. 2002. Thermal regime in the hyporheic zone of two contrasting salmonid spawning streams: Ecological and hydrological implications. Fisheries Management & Ecology 9, no. 1: 1-10.
28. McDonald M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. USGS Open-File Report 83-875. USGS, Washington, D.C.
29. Miall, A.D. 1996. The Geology of Fluvial Deposits: Sedimentary Facies, Basin Analysis, and Petroleum Geology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
30. Montgomery Watson. 1993a. Integrated groundwater and surface water model, documentation and user manual, December 1993. Sacramento, California: Montgomery Watson.
31. Montgomery Watson. 1993b. County groundwater model, model development and basin groundwater yield, June 1993. Sacramento, California: Sacramento County Water Agency.
32. Niswonger, R.G. 2005. The Hydroecological Significance of Perched Groundwater Beneath Streams. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, University of California, Davis.
33. Niswonger, R.G., and D.E. Prudic. 2004. Modeling variably saturated flow using kinematic waves in MODFLOW. In Hogan, J.F., Phillips, F.M., and Scanlon, B.R., eds., Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment. American Geophysical Union (AGU), Water Science and Application 9, p. 101-112.
34. Onta, P.R., A. Dasgupta, and R. Harboe. 1991. Multistep planning model for conjunctive use of surface-water and ground-water resources. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 117, no. 6: 662-678.
35. Perkins, S.P., and M. Sophocleous. 1999. Development of a comprehensive watershed model applied to study stream yield under drought conditions. Ground Water 37, no. 3: 418-426.
36. Peterson, D.M., and J.L. Wilson. 1988. Variably saturated flow between streams and aquifers. Technical Report. Las Cruces, New Mexico: New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, New Mexico State University.
37. Philip Williams and Associates (PWA). 1997. Analysis of Opportunities for Restoring a Natural Flood Regime on the Cosumnes River Floodplain. San Francisco, California: Philip Williams and Associates, Consultants in Hydrology.
38. Ponce, V.M., and D.S. Lindquist. 1990. Management of base-flow augmentation: A review. Water Resources Bulletin 26, no. 2: 259-268.
39. Prudic, D.E., L.F. Konikov, and E.R. Banta. 2004. A new streamflow-routing (SFR1) package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000. USGS Open-File Report 2004-1042. USGS, Reston, VA.
40. Pucci, A.A., and D.A. Pope. 1995. Simulated effects of development on regional ground-water/surface-water interactions in the northern coastal plain of New Jersey. Journal of Hydrology 167, no. 1-4: 241-262.
41. Ramireddygari, S.R., M.A. Sophocleous, J.K. Koelliker, S.P. Perkins, and R.S. Govindaraju. 2000. Development and application of a comprehensive simulation model to evaluate impacts of watershed structures and irrigation water use on streamflow and groundwater: The case of Wet Walnut Creek Watershed, Kansas, USA. Journal of Hydrology 236, no. 3-4: 223-246.
42. Reichard, E.G. 1995. Groundwater-surface water management with stochastic surface water supplies-A simulation optimization approach. Water Resources Research 31, no. 11: 2845-2865.
43. Ritzi, R.W., D.F. Dominic, N.R. Brown, K.W. Kausch, P.J. McAlenney, and M.J. Basial. 1995. Hydrofacies distribution and correlation in the Miami Valley aquifer system. Water Resources Research 31, no. 12: 3271-3281.
44. Ritzi, R.W., D.F. Dominic, A.J. Slesers, C.B. Greer, E.C. Reboulet, J.A. Telford, R.W. Masters, C.A. Klohe, J.L. Bogle and B.P. Means. 2000. Comparing statistical models of physical heterogeneity in buried-valley aquifers. Water Resources Research 36, no. 11: 3179-3192.
45. Rodgers, P., C. Soulsby, J. Petry, I. Malcolm, C. Gibbins, and S. Dunn. 2004. Groundwater-surface-water interactions in a braided river: A tracer-based assessment. Hydrological Processes 18, no. 7: 1315-1332.
46. Scheibe, T., and S. Yabusaki. 1998. Scaling of flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous groundwater systems. Advances in Water Resources 22, no. 3: 223-238.
47. Shrier, C.J., J. Stafford, and J. Altenhofen. 2002. Integration of habitat enhancement efforts into managed groundwater recharge facilities. In Proceedings of the Ground Water/ Surface Water Interactions, AWRA 2002 Summer Specialty Conference, July 1-3, 2002, Colorado, 473-477.
48. Smith, L., and S.J. Wheatcraft. 1993. Groundwater flow. In Handbook of Hydrology, 6.1-6.58, ed. D.R. Maidment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Smith, R.E. 1983. Approximate soil water movement by kinematic characteristics. Journal of the Soils Science Society of America 47, no. 1: 3-8.
50. Sophocleous, M. 2002. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 10, no. 1: 52-67.
51. Sophocleous, M., A. Koussis, J.L. Martin, and S.P. Perkins. 1995. Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration. Ground Water 33, no. 4: 579-588.
52. Storey, R.G., K.W.F. Howard, and D.D. Williams. 2003. Factors controlling riffle-scale hyporheic exchange flows and their seasonal changes in a gaining stream: A three-dimensional groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research 39, no. 2: 1034.
53. Tabidian, M.A., and D.T. Pederson. 1995. Impact of irrigation wells on baseflow of the Big Blue River, Nebraska. Water Resources Bulletin 31, no. 2: 295-306.
54. The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 1997. Alternatives for reestablishing fall attraction flows for Chinook salmon on the Cosumnes River (internal memo). The Nature Conservancy.
55. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1995. Draft Anadromous Fish Restoration Plan: A Plan to Increase Natural Production of Anadromous Fish in the Central Valley of California. Sacramento, California: The Service.
56. Wang, C.C., B. Mortazavi, W.K. Liang, N.Z. Sun, and W.W.G. Yeh. 1995. Model development for conjunctive use study of the San Jacinto Basin, California. Water Resources Bulletin 31, no. 2: 227-241.
57. Weissmann, G.S., S.F. Carle, and G.E. Fogg. 1999. Three dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics. Water Resources Research 35, no. 6: 1761-1770.
58. Weissmann, G.S., and G.E. Fogg. 1999. Multi-scale alluvial fan heterogeneity modeled with transition probability geostatistics in a sequence stratigraphic framework. Journal of Hydrology 226, no. 1-2: 48-65.
59. Weissmann, G.S., Y. Zhang, E.M. LaBolle, and G.E. Fogg. 2002. Dispersion of groundwater age in an alluvial aquifer system. Water Resources Research 38, no. 10: 16-1-16-8.
60. Whitener, K. 2002. Oral communication. Davis, CA.
61. Woessner, W.W. 2000. Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water 38, no. 3: 423-429.
62. Wroblicky, G.J., M.E. Campana, H.M. Valett, and C.N. Dahm. 1998. Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research 34, no. 3: 317-328.