Pre-service teachers’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational model

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 137-152

  Baydas, Ozlem ^a   Yilmaz, Rabia M ^a  

^a GIRESUN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; TEACHING;

AFFECTIVE NEEDS; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; ICT COURSE; MOBILE LEARNING; PRE-SERVICE TEACHER; PRE-SERVICE TEACHER TRAINING; SOCIAL NEEDS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 85040317824     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12521     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adedoja, G., Adelore, O., Egbokhare, F. & Oluleye, A. (2013). Learners’ acceptance of the use of mobile phones to deliver tutorials in a distance learning context: a case study at the University of Ibadan. The African Journal of Information Systems, 5, 80–93.
2. Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students' attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 111–119.
3. Anderson, S. & Maninger, R. (2007). Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37, 151–172.
4. Bryant, J. & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662–704.
5. Cavus, N. & Uzunboylu, H. (2009). Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 434–438.
6. Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F. & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 809–826.
7. Chen, G. D., Chang, C. K. & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & Education, 50, 77–90.
8. Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: a uses and gratifications perspective on how active twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 755–762.
9. Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C. & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 347–359.
10. Chung, H.-H., Chen, S.-C. & Kuo, M.-H. (2015). A study of EFL college students’ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333–339.
11. Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing and Management, 35, 727–750.
12. Erol, K. & Erol, E. E. (2015). Dil-İletişim İlişkisi Kapsamında Beden Dilinin İşlevi [The function of body language within language-communication relationship]. International Journal of Social Science, 35, 89–97.
13. Fan, C.-W. (2014). Applied the technology acceptance model to survey the mobile-learning adoption behavior in science museum. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 12, 22–29.
14. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE.
15. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Princeton, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Hashim, F. H., Tan, F. B. & Rashid, A. (2015). Adult learners' intention to adopt mobile learning: a motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology Special Issue: Teacher-Led Inquiry and Learning Design, 46, 381–390.
17. Huang, J. H., Lin, Y. R. & Chuang, S. T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: a perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. User Behavior of Mobile Learning, 25, 585–598.
18. Hwang, G. J. & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023–1031.
19. Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Yin, P. Y. & Chuang, K. H. (2010). A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54, 404–415.
20. Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Tsai, C. C. & Yang, S. J. H. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments. Computers & Education, 53, 402–413.
21. Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P. & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009, December). An acceptance of mobile learning for higher education students in Thailand. In Sixth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society (Vol. 17, No. 18, pp. 361–368). Thailand.
22. Jones, A. & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: affective & social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395–408.
23. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
24. Liaw, S. S., Hatala, M. & Huang, H. M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54, 446–454.
25. Lin, H. & Gorrel, J. (2001). Exploratory analysis of pre-service teacher efficacy in Taiwan. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 623–635.
26. Liu, Y., Li, H. & Carlsson, C. (2009). Exploring the factors driving M-learning adoption AIS. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the AMCIS 2009, San Francisco.
27. Madarsha, K. B. (2013, January). Mobile learning acceptance among students of Ramkhamhaeng University, Thailand. In The First International Conference in Islamic Education YRU-ICIE 2013. Songkhla, Thailand: Faculty of Education Yala Rajabhat University.
28. Marston, C. (2010). Generational insights: practical solutions for understanding and engaging a generationally disconnected workforce. United States: Independent Publisher.
29. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
30. McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.
31. Mondi, M., Woods, P. & Rafi, A. (2008). A uses and gratification expectancy model to predict students perceived learning experience. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 241–261.
32. Mtebe, J. S. & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and instructors’ intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 250–271.
33. O'Connell, M. & Smith, J. (2007). A guide to working with m-learning standards: a manual for teachers trainers and developers. Sydney: Australian Flexible Learning Network.
34. Park, Y. S., Nam, M. & Cha, S. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 592–605.
35. Picard, R. W. & Klein, J. (2002). Computers that recognise and respond to user emotion: theoretical and practical implications. Interacting with Computers, 14, 141–169.
36. Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Reychav, I. & Wu, D. (2014). Exploring mobile tablet training for road safety: a uses and gratifications perspective. Computers & Education, 71, 43–55.
38. Simsek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapιsal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamalarι [Introduce to structural equation modeling: Basic Principles and LISREL Practices]. Ankara: Ekinoks.
39. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Wang, Y., Wu, M. & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92–118.
41. Wang, Z., Tchernev, J. M. & Solloway, T. (2012). A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1829–1839.