Assessing the Learning Process Playing with Kahoot – A Study with Upper Secondary School Pupils Learning Electrical Circuits

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Volumn 715, Issue , 2018, Pages 602-612

  Tsihouridis, Charilaos ^a   Vavougios, Dennis ^a   Ioannidis, George S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Classroom Response Systems; ICT; Kahoot; Teaching electric circuits

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC NETWORK PARAMETERS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); TEACHING; TIMING CIRCUITS;

CLASSROOM RESPONSE SYSTEMS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; KAHOOT; SECONDARY SCHOOLS; TEACHING PRACTICES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 85040199811     PISSN: 21945357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_70     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Sharma, A., Gandhar, K., Sharma, S., Seema, S.: Role of ICT in the process of teaching and learning. J. Educ. Pract. 2(5), 1–5 (2011)
2. Wendy, M.: Not just tools: the role of E-technologies in culture of learning. Educ. Commun. Inf. 1(2), 229–235 (2001)
3. Lucke, Τ., Keyssner, U., Dunn, P.: The use of a classroom response system to more effectively flip the classroom. In: IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2013, pp. 491–495 (2013)
4. Duncan, D.: Clickers in the Classroom. Pearson, San Francisco (2004)
5. Owusu, A., Weatherby, N., Otto, S., Kang, M.: Validation of a classroom response system for use with a health risk assessment survey. Poster session at the 2007 AAHPERD National Convention and Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland (2007)
6. Abramson, D., Pietroszek, K., Chinaei, L., Lank, E., Terry, M.: Classroom response systems in higher education: meeting user needs with NetClick. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), March 2013, pp. 840–846 (2013)
7. Collins, K.: Kahoot! is gamifying the classroom (2015). http://www.wired.co.uk/article/kahoot-gaming-education-platform-norway
8. Diaz, C., Trejo, C.: Kahoot: The Student-Teacher Interactive Classroom Tool (2015)
9. Meijen, C.: Kahoot: using a game based classroom response system in teaching. School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Kent (2015)
10. Sunde, M.T., Underdal, A.G.: Investigating QoE in a cloud-based classroom response system, a real-life longitudinal and cross-sectional study of Kahoot. Master of Science in Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway (2014)
11. Fotaris, P., Mastoras, T., Leinfellner, R., Rosunally, Y.: Climbing up the leaderboard: an empirical study of applying gamification techniques to a computer programming class. Electron. J. e-Learn. 14(2), 94–110 (2016)
12. Wang, A.I.: The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Comput. Educ. 82(C), 1–24 (2015)
13. Driver, R.: Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 11(5), 481– 490 (1989)
14. Shipstone, D.M.: A study of children’s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. Eur. J. Sci. Educ. 6(2), 185–198 (1984)
15. Psillos, D., Koumaras, P., Valassiades, O.: Pupils’ representations of electric current before, during, and after instruction on DC circuits. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 5(2), 185–199 (1987)
16. Engelhardt, P.V., Beichner, R.J.: Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. Am. J. Phys. 72(1), 98–115 (2003)
17. Baser, M.: Effects on conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on preservice teachers’ understanding of direct current circuits. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 15(5), 367– 381 (2006)
18. Moore, C.J., Rubbo, L.J.: Scientific reasoning abilities of non-science majors in physics-based courses. Phys. Rev. STPER, 8(1), 1–18 (2011)