Involving citizens in priority setting for public health research: Implementation in infection research

Health Expectations

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 222-229

  Rawson, Timothy M ^a   Castro Sánchez, Enrique ^a   Charani, Esmita ^a   Husson, Fran ^a   Moore, Luke S P ^a   Holmes, Alison H ^a   Ahmad, Raheelah ^a,b  

^a The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with UK Health Security Agency   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

infection funding; patient public engagement; strategic decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ADULT; AGED; COMMUNICABLE DISEASES; COMMUNICABLE DISEASES, EMERGING; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; DRUG RESISTANCE, MICROBIAL; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 85040100719     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12604     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fitchett JR, Head MG, Cooke MK, Wurie FB, Atun R. Funding infectious disease research: a systematic analysis of UK research investments by funders 1997-2010. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105722.
2. Elliott J. HRA Strategy for Public Involvement. 2013. http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2013/10/hra-public-involvement-strategy-circulation-september-2013.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2017.
3. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32:223-231.
4. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. Patient and Public Involvement in Strategy. 2015. http://www.hqip.org.uk/media/PPI%20in%20QI.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2017.
5. Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J. Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009;91:219-228.
6. Paskins Z, Jinks C, Mahmood W, et al. Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:45.
7. Etchegary H, Bishop L, Street C, et al. Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through community town halls. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:192.
8. Valerio MA, Rodriguez N, Winkler P, et al. Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16:1-11.
9. Hunter DJ, Kieslich K, Littlejohns P, et al. Public involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society. J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30:796-808.
10. Rowlands G, Protheroe J, Price H, Gann B, Rafi I. Health Literacy. Report from an RCGP-Led Health Literacy Workshop. 2014.
11. Lake Research Partners. Informing and Involving Patients in Medical Decisions: The Primary Care Physicians Perspective. 2009.
12. Frosch DL, Moulton BW, Wexler RM, Holmes-Rovner M, Volk RJ, Levin CA. Shared decision making in the United States: policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105:305-312.
13. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expect. 2006;9:307-320.
14. Coulter A, Collins A. Making Shared Decision Making a Reality: No Decision about Me, without Me.; 2011. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs_decisionmaking.html. Accessed February 2, 2017.
15. Morris NS, MacLean CD, Chew LD, Littenberg B. The Single Item Literacy Screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:21.
16. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 2014;14:89.
17. Forsythe LP, Szydlowski V, Murad MH, et al. A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(SUPPL. 3):788-800.
18. Van Bekkum JE, Hilton S. UK research funding bodies' views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:318.
19. Wellcome Trust. Antibiotic resistance poorly communicated and widely misunderstood by UK public. 2015:July. https://wellcome.ac.uk/press-release/antibiotic-resistance-poorly-communicated-and-widely-misunderstood-uk-public. Accessed February 2, 2017.
20. Ahmad R, Iwami M, Castro-Sánchez E, et al. Defining the user role in infection control. J Hosp Infect 2015;92:321-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.09.018.
21. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Nurse Res. 2011;18:4-5.
22. Bradley EH, Curry LA., Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007;42:1758-1772.
23. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349-357.
24. Elliot AJ, Hughes HE, Astbury J, et al. The potential impact of media reporting in syndromic surveillance: an example using a possible Cryptosporidium exposure in North West England, August to September 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30368.
25. Barnes M, Newman J. Sullivan H, Helen C. Power, Participation and Political Renewal: Case Studies in Public Participation. Policy; 2007.
26. Brown T. Evidence, expertise, and facts in a “post-truth” society. BMJ. 2016;355:9-10.