UK research funding bodies' views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: An exploratory study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Van Bekkum, Jennifer E ^a   Hilton, Shona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision making; Health; Public engagement; Public involvement; Public participation; Research funding

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLIC OPINION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC;

EID: 84904530105     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-318     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. HM Treasury, Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014 Norwich: HMSO 2004
2. Department of Health, Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy London: Department of Health 2006
3. Public engagement coming of age: from theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Delgado A, Kjølberg KL, Wickson F, Public Underst Sci 2011 20 6 826 845
4. An integrated approach to consumer representation and involvement in a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Langston AL, Mccallum M, Campbell MK, Robertson C, Ralston SH, Clin Trials 2005 2 1 80 87 (Pubitemid 40332931)
5. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, Milne R, Buchanan P, Health Technol Assess 2004 8 15 148
6. Involving young service users as co-researchers: possibilities, benefits and costs. McLaughlin H, Brit J Soc Work 2006 36 8 1395 1410 (Pubitemid 44906078)
7. Staley K, Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research INVOLVE: Eastleigh 2009
8. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG, Soc Sci Med 2005 60 11 2575 2584 (Pubitemid 40462381)
9. Seeking evidence from medical research consumers as part of the medical research process could improve the uptake of research evidence. Whitstock MT, J Eval Clin Pract 2003 9 2 213 224 (Pubitemid 36749551)
10. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Jasanoff S, Minerva 2003 41 3 223 244 (Pubitemid 41341976)
11. Research, policy and funding-academic treadmills and the squeeze on intellectual spaces. Smith K, Br J Sociol 2010 61 1 176 195
12. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. O'Donnell M, Entwistle V, Health Policy 2004 70 3 281 290 (Pubitemid 39361099)
13. The policy science of democracy: the issues of methodology and citizen participation. Wagle U, Policy Sci 2000 33 2 207 223 (Pubitemid 32117075)
14. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M, The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies London: Sage 1994
15. Cooksey D, A review of UK Health Research Funding London: TSO 2006
16. The UK national consensus conference on plant biotechnology. Joss S, Durant J, Public Underst Sci 1995 4 2 195 204
17. Research Councils UK, Concordat for Engaging the Public with Research London: Research Councils UK 2010
18. National Institute for Health Research, The Way Forward: Making a Difference in Research by Actively Involving People Leeds: Naitonal Institute for Health Research 2010
19. Grounded theory: obejectivist and constructivist methods. Charmaz K, Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry London: Sage Publications, Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, 2 2003 249 291
20. Charmaz K, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis London: Sage Publications Ltd 2006
21. Clarke AE, Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn Thousand Oaks: Sage 2005
22. Strauss AL, Corbin J, Grounded Theory in Practice Thousand Oaks: Sage 1997
23. Grounded theory. Charmaz K, Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods London: Sage Publications Ltd, Smith JA, 2003
24. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Qualitative Research in Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers London: Sage 2003
25. Subjectivity and relfexivity in the social sciences: epistemic windows and methodological consquences. Breuer F, Roth W-M, Forum Qual Soc Res 2003 4 2 25
26. Democratizations of science and technology. Kleinman DL, Science, Technology, and Democracy Albany: State University of New York Press, Kleinman DL, 2000 139 166
27. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, McDonald C, Kearney N, Patient Educ Couns 2007 65 1 21 33 (Pubitemid 44822622)
28. Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Felt U, Fochler M, Minerva 2010 48 3 219 238
29. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Irwin A, Soc Stud Sci 2006 36 2 299 320 (Pubitemid 43384514)
30. Doing dialogue: genre and flexibility in public engagement with science. Davies SR, Sci Cult 2009 18 4 397 416
31. "What are we busy doing?": engaging the idiot. Michael M, Sci Technol Hum Val 2012 37 5 528 554
32. 'Ordinary people only': knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Martin GP, Sociol Health Illn 2008 30 1 35 54
33. La spécifité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progress de la raison. Bourdieu P, Sociologie et Sociétés 1975 7 91 118
34. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin F-P, Soc Sci Med 2003 57 2 239 251 (Pubitemid 36582667)
35. Public knowledge, public trust: understanding the 'knowledge deficit'. Brunk CG, Public Health Genomics 2006 9 3 178 183 (Pubitemid 43854182)
36. Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter "science"?: a response to Darrin Durant, "Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public" Wynne B, Public Underst Sci 2008 17 1 21 33
37. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics? Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Demers-Payette O, Boivin A, Soc Sci Med 2009 68 11 2002 2009
38. Public engagement in research funding: a study of public capabilities and engagement methodology. Rowe G, Rawsthorne D, Scarpello T, Dainty JR, Public Underst Sci 2010 19 2 225 239
39. 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. Litva A, Coast J, Donovan J, Eyles J, Shepherd M, Tacchi J, Abelson J, Morgan K, Soc Sci Med 2002 54 12 1825 1837 (Pubitemid 34462159)
40. Science for All Expert Group, Science for All London: Department for Business Innovations and Skills 2010
41. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Rowe G, Frewer LJ, Sci Technol Hum Val 2005 30 2 251 290 (Pubitemid 40465733)
42. Designing public participation processes. Bryson JM, Quick KS, Slotterback CS, Crosby BC, Public Adm Rev 2013 73 1 23 34
43. On the shoulders of idiots: re-thinking science communication as 'event'. Horst M, Michael M, Sci Cult 2011 20 3 283 306