Towards an ecology of participation: Process philosophy and co-creation of higher education curricula

European Educational Research Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 112-128

  Taylor, Carol A ^a   Bovill, Catherine ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AN Whitehead; co creation; curriculum; ecology of participation; higher education; process philosophy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85039902061     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14749041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1474904117704102     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Apple MW, (1981) On analysing hegemony. In: Giroux HA, Penna AN, Pinar WF, (eds) Curriculum and Instruction Alternatives in Education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchen Publishing.
2. Barnett R, Coate K, (2005) Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press/The Society for Research into Higher Education.
3. Beard C, Clegg S, Smith K, (2007) Acknowledging the affective in higher education. British Educational Research Journal 33(2): 235–252.
4. Biesta G, (2014) Is philosophy of education a historical mistake? Connecting philosophy and education differently. Theory and Research in Education 12(1): 65–76.
5. Bingham C, Biesta G, (2010) Jacques Rancière: Education, Truth, Emancipation. London: Continuum.
6. Boomer G, (1992) Curriculum composing and evaluating: An invitation to action research. In: Boomer G, Lester N, Onore C, Cook J, (eds) Negotiating the Curriculum; Educating for the 21st Century. London and Washington, DC: Falmer Press, pp.32–45.
7. Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, (2011) Changing participants in pedagogical planning: Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula. International Journal for Academic Development 16(2): 133–145.
8. Bovill C, (2013a) Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education? In: Dunne E, Owen D, (eds) The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education. Bingley, UK: Emerald, pp.461–475.
9. Bovill C, (2013b) Students and staff co-creating curricula: A new trend or an old idea we never got around to implementing? In: Rust C, (ed.) Improving Student Learning through Research and Scholarship: 20 years of ISL. Oxford, UK: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development, pp.96–108.
10. Bovill C, (2014) An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 51(1): 15–25.
11. Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, (2011) Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development 16(2): 133–145.
12. Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, Millard L, Moore-Cherry N, (2016) Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education 71(2): 195–208.
13. Bron J, Bovill C, Veugelers W, (2016) Curriculum negotiation: The relevance of Boomer’s approach to the curriculum as a process, integrating student voice and developing democratic citizenship. Curriculum Perspectives 36(1): 15–27.
14. Business, Innovation and Skills Department (2011) Students at the Heart of the System. London: TSO.
15. Cook-Sather A, Bovill C, Felten P, (2014) Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
16. Dewey J, (1916) Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
17. Dewey J, (1938) Experience and Education. Indianapolis: Kappa Delta Pi.
18. Fraser S, Bosanquet A, (2006) The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education 31(3): 269–284.
19. Hamilton D, (1999) The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England?). Pedagogy, Culture & Society 7(1): 135–152.
20. Healey M, Flint A, Harrington K, (2014) Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
21. Henning B, (n.d.) Re-centering process thought: Recovering beauty in A. N. Whitehead’s late work. Available at: https://whiteheadresearch.org/occasions/conferences/beyond-metaphysics/papers/HenningB-Re-CenteringProcessThought.pdf (accessed 19 April 2016).
22. Hernes T, (2014) Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947). In: Helin J, Hernes T, Hjorth D, Holt R, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford Handbooks Online. Available at: DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0016 (accessed 31 December 2016).
23. Kalervo N, Gulson S, Symes C, (2007) Spatial Theories of Education: Policy and Geography Matters. New York: Routledge.
24. Leathwood C, Hey V, (2009) Gender(ed) discourses and emotional sub-texts: Theorising emotion in UK higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 14(4): 429–440.
25. Mann SJ, (2008) Study, Power and the University. Society for Research into Higher Education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
26. Pinar W, (1975) Currere: Towards reconceptualization. In: Pinar W, (ed.) Curriculum Theorizing: The Reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation, pp.396–414.
27. Ryan A, Tilbury D, (2013) Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Available at: www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/npi_report.pdf (accessed 12 November 2016).
28. Shaviro S, (2008) Self-enjoyment and concern: On Whitehead and Levinas. Available at: http://shaviro.com/Othertexts/Modes.pdf (accessed 18 April 2016).
29. Sherburne D, (2004) Whitehead, Descartes, and terminology. In: Polanowski JA, Sherburne D, (eds) Whitehead’s Philosophy: Points of Connection. New York: State University of New York Press, pp.3–18.
30. Stenhouse L, (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
31. Stenner P, (2008) A. N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity 22(1): 90–109.
32. Stout M, (2012) Symposium introduction: Process philosophy. Administrative Theory and Praxis 34(3): 357–361.
33. Tamboukou M, (2015) Feeling narrative in the archive: The question of serendipity. Qualitative Inquiry 16(2): 151–166.
34. Taylor CA, (2013) Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education 25(6): 688–703.
35. Taylor CA, (2014) Telling transitions: Space, materiality and ethical practices in a collaborative writing workshop. Cultural Studies=Critical Methodologies 14(4): 396–406.
36. Taylor CA, (2015) A guide to ethics and student engagement through partnership. York, UK: HEA. Available at: www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/guide-ethics-and-student-engagement-through-partnership (accessed).
37. Taylor CA, McCaig C, (2014) Evaluating the Impact of Number Controls, Choice and Competition: An Analysis of the Student Profile and the Student Learning Environment in the New Higher Education Landscape. York, UK: HEA.
38. Taylor CA, Robinson C, (2009) Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 17(2): 161–175.
39. Taylor CA, Robinson C, (2014) ‘What matters in the end is to act well’: Student engagement and ethics. In: Bryson C, (ed.) Understanding and Developing Student Engagement: Perspectives from Universities and Students. London: Routledge, pp.161–175.
40. Thompson EH, (2000) ‘Feeling’ good: Knowing is more than motivation. Interchange 31(1): 91–94.
41. Tyler RW, (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42. Whitehead AN, (1933) Adventures in Ideas. London: Cambridge University Press.
43. Whitehead AN, (1968) Modes of Thought. New York: The Free Press.
44. Whitehead AN, (1985) Process and Reality. New York: The Free Press.