Cumulative attraction and spatial dependence in a destination choice model for beach recreation

Tourism Management

Volumn 66, Issue , 2018, Pages 318-328

  Matthews, Yvonne ^a   Scarpa, Riccardo ^a,b,c   Marsh, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agglomerating and Competing Destination Choice; Beach recreation; Choice modelling

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; BEACH; MODELING; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TOURIST ATTRACTION; TOURIST DESTINATION;

COROMANDEL PENINSULA; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND; WAIKATO;

EID: 85039705517     PISSN: None     EISSN: 02615177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bekhor, S., Prashker, J.N., GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved similarities among alternatives. Transportation Research Part B 42:3 (2008), 243–262 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.08.003.
2. Bernardin, V., Koppelman, F., Boyce, D., Enhanced destination choice models incorporating agglomeration related to trip chaining while controlling for spatial competition. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2132 (2009), 143–151 http://doi.org/10.3141/2132-16.
3. Bhat, C.R., Dubey, S.K., Alam, M.J.B., Khushefati, W.H., A new spatial multiple discrete-continuous modeling approach to land use change analysis. Journal of Regional Science 55:5 (2015), 801–841.
4. Bhat, C.R., Guo, J., A mixed spatially correlated logit model: Formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38:2 (2004), 147–168 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00005-5.
5. Bierlaire, M., BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. 2003.
6. Bierlaire, M., A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Annals of Operations Research 144:1 (2006), 287–300.
7. Bujosa, A., Riera, A., Torres, C.M., Valuing tourism demand attributes to guide climate change adaptation measures efficiently: The case of the Spanish domestic travel market. Tourism Management 47 (2015), 233–239 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.023.
8. Chu, C., A paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis. Transport policy, management & technology towards 2001: Selected proceedings of the fifth world conference on transport research, Vol. 4, 1989.
9. Collins, D., Kearns, R., “Pulling up the tent Pegs?” The significance and changing status of coastal campgrounds in New Zealand. Tourism Geographies 12:1 (2010), 53–76 http://doi.org/10.1080/14616680903493647.
10. Coombes, E.G., Jones, A.P., Sutherland, W.J., The biodiversity implications of changes in coastal tourism due to climate change. Environmental Conservation 35:4 (2008), 319–330.
11. Daly, A., Estimating “tree” logit models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 21:4 (1987), 251–267 http://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(87)90026-9.
12. Daly, A., Bierlaire, M., A general and operational representation of generalised extreme value models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40:4 (2006), 285–305.
13. Decrop, A., Destination choice sets. Annals of Tourism Research 37 (2010), 93–115.
14. Drakopoulos, S.A., Hierarchical choice in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys 8:2 (1994), 133–153 http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1994.tb00097.x.
15. Fotheringham, S., A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations. Environment & Planning A 15 (1983), 15–36.
16. Griffith, D.A., Spatial structure and spatial interaction: 25 Years later. The Review of Regional Studies 37:1 (2007), 28–38.
17. Handy, S.L., Clifton, K.J., Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 4:2/3 (2001), 67–78.
18. Handy, S.L., Niemeier, D.A., Measuring Accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29:7 (1997), 1175–1194 http://doi.org/10.1068/a291175.
19. Ho, C.Q., Hensher, D.A., A workplace choice model accounting for spatial competition and agglomeration effects. Journal of Transport Geography 51 (2016), 193–203 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.005.
20. Ishaq, R., Bekhor, S., Shiftan, Y., A flexible model structure approach for discrete choice models. Transportation 40:3 (2013), 609–624 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9431-8.
21. Kearns, R., Collins, D., Feeling for the coast: The place of emotion in resistance to residential development. Social & Cultural Geography 13:8 (2012), 937–955 http://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.730150.
22. Klaiber, H.A., von Haefen, R.H., Incorporating random coefficients and alternative specific constants into discrete choice models: Implications for in-sample fit and welfare estimates. Western Regional Research, 200, 2008.
23. Larson, D.M., Lew, D.K., The opportunity cost of travel time as a noisy wage fraction. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(2), 2013, 420 http://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat093.
24. Lieberson, S., Measuring population diversity. American Sociological Review, 1969, 850–862.
25. Lue, C.-C., Crompton, J.L., Fesenmaier, D.R., Conceptualization of multi-destination pleasure trips. Annals of Tourism Research 20:2 (1993), 289–301.
26. Lue, C.-C., Crompton, J.L., Stewart, W.P., Evidence of cumulative attraction in multidestination recreational trip decisions. Journal of Travel Research 35:1 (1996), 41–49 http://doi.org/10.1177/004728759603500107.
27. McFadden, D., Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka, P., (eds.) Frontiers in econometrics, 1974, Academic Press, New York.
28. McFadden, D., Modelling the choice of residential location. 1978, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
29. Mendelsohn, R., Hof, J., Peterson, G., Johnson, R., Measuring recreation values with multiple destination trips. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74:4 (1992), 926–933 http://doi.org/10.2307/1243190.
30. Mkwara, L., Marsh, D., Scarpa, R., The effect of within-season variability on estimates of recreational value for trout anglers in New Zealand. Ecological Economics 119 (2015), 338–345 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.012.
31. Nelson, R., The selection of retail locations. 1958, Dodge, New York.
32. Pagliara, F., Timmermans, H., Choice set generation in spatial contexts: A review. Transportation Letters 1:3 (2009), 181–196 http://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2009.01.03.181-196.
33. Parsons, G.R., Wilson, A.J., Incidental and joint consumption in recreation demand. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 26 (1997), 1–6.
34. Pellegrini, P.A., Fotheringham, A.S., Modelling spatial choice: A review and synthesis in a migration context. Progress in Human Geography 26:4 (2002), 487–510.
35. Phaneuf, D.J., Smith, V.K., Chapter 15 recreation demand models. Mler, Karl-Gran, Vincent, Jeffrey R., (eds.) Handbook of environmental economics, Vol. 2, 2005, Elsevier, 671–761 Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574009905020152.
36. Schüssler, N., Axhausen, K.W., Accounting for similarities in destination choice modelling: A concept. ETH, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, IVT, 2009, Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transportsysteme.
37. Sener, I.N., Pendyala, R.M., Bhat, C.R., Accommodating spatial correlation across choice alternatives in discrete choice models: An application to modeling residential location choice behavior. Journal of Transport Geography 19:2 (2011), 294–303 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.013.
38. Smirnov, O.A., Egan, K.J., Spatial random utility model with an application to recreation demand. Frontiers in Spatial Econometrics Modelling 29:1 (2012), 72–78 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.026.
39. Taylor, R.G., McKean, J.R., Johnson, D., Measuring the location value of a recreation site. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35:1 (2010), 87–104.
40. Thiene, M., Scarpa, R., Hiking in the Alps: Exploring substitution patterns of hiking destinations. Tourism Economics 14:2 (2008), 263–282.
41. Thiene, M., Swait, J., Scarpa, R., Choice set formation for outdoor destinations: The role of motivations and preference discrimination in site selection for the management of public expenditures on protected areas. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 81 (2017), 152–173 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.08.002.
42. Thomson, J., Coastal values and beach use survey report (Technical Report No. 2003/09)., 2003, Waikato Regional Council Retrieved from http://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/Services/Publications/Technical-reports/2003-technical-reports/.
43. Train, K.E., Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74:2 (1998), 230–239.
44. Vovsha, P., Application of cross-nested logit model to mode choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1607 (1997), 6–15.
45. Weidenfeld, A., Butler, R.W., Williams, A.M., Clustering and compatibility between tourism attractions. International Journal of Tourism Research 12:1 (2010), 1–16.
46. Wen, C.-H., Koppelman, F.S., The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35:7 (2001), 627–641.
47. Windle, Rolfe, J., Comparing Responses from Internet and Paper-Based Collection Methods in more Complex Stated Preference Environmental Valuation Surveys. Economic Analysis and Policy 41:1 (2011), 83–97 http://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(11)50006-2.
48. Wu, L., Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A., Representing tourists' heterogeneous choices of destination and travel party with an integrated latent class and nested logit model. Tourism Management 32:6 (2011), 1407–1413 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.01.017.
49. Yang, Y., Fik, T., Zhang, J., Modeling sequential tourist flows: Where is the next destination?. Annals of Tourism Research 43 (2013), 297–320 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.07.005.
50. Yeh, C.-Y., Haab, T.C., Sohngen, B.L., Modeling multiple-objective recreation trips with choices over trip duration and alternative sites. Environmental & Resource Economics 34 (2006), 189–209.