Spatial random utility model with an application to recreation demand

Economic Modelling

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 72-78

  Smirnov, Oleg A ^a   Egan, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete choice; Random utility model; Spatial dependence; Travel demand

Indexed keywords

EID: 82355184072     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.026     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anselin Luc Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 2002, 27(3):247-267. Nov.
2. Azevedo Christopher D., Egan Kevin J., Herriges Joseph A., Kling Catherine L. "The Iowa Lakes Valuation Project: Summary and Findings from Year One," Final Report, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 2003.
3. Bekhor Shlomo, Prashker Joseph N. GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved similarities among alternatives. Transportation Research. Part B 2008, 42:243-262.
4. Ben-Akiva Moshe E., Lerman Steven R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press Series in Transportation Studies, 9 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bhat Chandra R., Guo Jessica A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research. Part B 2004, 38:147-168.
6. Bierlaire M., Bolduc D., McFadden Daniel The estimation of generalized extreme value models from choice-based samples. Transportation Research. Part B 2008, 42:381-394.
7. Brock William, Durlauf Steven N. A multinomial choice model with neighborhood effects. American Economic Review 2002, 92(2):298-303. May.
8. Conley Timothy G., Topa Giorgio Estimating dynamic local interactions models. Journal of Econometrics 2007, 140(1):76-96. Sep.
9. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys - The Tailored Design Method 2007, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey. Second Edition.
10. Dugundji Elenna R., Gulyás László Sociodynamic discrete choice on networks in space: impacts of agent heterogeneity on emergent outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008, 35(6):1028-1054.
11. Egan Kevin J., Herriges Joseph A., Kling Catherine L., Downing John A. Valuing water quality as a function of water quality measures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009, 91(1):106-123. Feb.
12. Goetzke Frank Network effects in public transit use: evidence from a spatially autoregressive mode choice model. Urban Studies 2008, 45(2):407-417.
13. Hanemann Michael W. Discrete-continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 1984, 52(3):541-561. May.
14. Koppelman Frank S., Sethi Vaneet Incorporating variance and covariance heterogeneity in the Generalized Nested Logit model: an application to modeling long distance travel choice behavior. Transportation Research. Part B 2005, 39:825-853.
15. Lee Lung-Fei Asymptotic distributions of quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial autoregressive models. Econometrics 2004, 72(6):1899-1925.
16. Louviere Jordan, Train Kenneth, Ben-Akiva Moshe, Bhat Chandra, Brownstone David, Cameron Trudy Ann, Carson Richard T., Deshzo J.R., Fiebig Denzil, Green William, Hensher David, Waldman Donald Recent progress on endogeneity in choice modeling. Marketing Letters 2005, 16(3:4):255-265.
17. Louviere Jordan J. What you don't know might hurt you: some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 34(1):173-188. May.
18. Manski Charles F. Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2000, 14(3):115-136. Summer.
19. McFadden Daniel Modeling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location 1978, 75-96. North-Holland, Amsterdam. A. Karlqvist (Ed.).
20. Moeltner Klaus, Shonkwiler J.Scott Correcting for on-site sampling in random utility models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87(2):327-339. May.
21. Morey Edward, Thacher Jennifer, Breffle William Using angler characteristics and attitudinal data to identify environmental preference classes: a latent-class model. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 34(1):91-115. May.
22. Páez Antonio, Scott Darren M. Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(3):647-665.
23. Páez Antonio, Scott Darren M., Volz Erik A discrete-choice approach to modeling social influence on individual decision making. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008, 35(6):1055-1069.
24. Phaneuf Daniel J., Smith V.Kerry Recreation Demand Models. Handbook of Environmental Economics 2005, Volume 2:671-761. Elsevier, Chapter 15. K.-G. Mäler, J.R. Vincent (Eds.).
25. Scheinkman José A. Social Interactions 2005, Princeton University, Department of Economics Working paper.
26. Sivakumar Aruna, Bhat Chandra R. A comprehensive, unified, framework for analyzing spatial location choice. Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC 2007.
27. Smirnov Oleg A., Anselin Luc E. An O(N) parallel method of computing the Log-Jacobian of the variable transformation for models with spatial interaction on a lattice. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2009, 53(8):2980-2988. Jun.
28. Smirnov Oleg A. Modeling spatial discrete choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2010, 40(5):292-298. Sep.
29. Smirnov Oleg A. Spatial econometrics approach to integration of behavioral biases in travel demand analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2010, 2157:1-10.
30. Smith Tony E., LeSage James P. A Bayesian Probit Model with Spatial Dependencies. Spatial and Spatiotemporal Econometrics 2004, Volume 18:127-160. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Nethelands. J.P. Lesage, R.K. Pace (Eds.).
31. Train Kenneth E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.