Cratering-energy regimes: From linear collision cascades to heat spikes to macroscopic impacts

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 23, 2001, Pages

  Keinonen, J ^a   Bringa, E M ^a   Nordlund, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038317945     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.235426     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. W. Jäger and K.L. Merkle, Philos. Mag. A 57, 479 (1988).
2. R.M. Papaléo, L.S. Farenzena, M.A. de Araujo, R.P. Livi, M. Alurralde, and G. Bermudez, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 148, 126 (2000).
3. R.M. Papaléo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 131, 121 (1997).
4. F. Thibaudau, J. Cousty, E. Balanzat, and S. Bouffard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1582 (1991).
5. Q. Yang, T. Li, B.V. King, and R.J. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 53, 3032 (1996).
6. R. Aderjan and H.M. Urbassek, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 164-165, 697 (2000).
7. C.T. Reimann, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 95, 181 (1994).
8. D.A. Kolesnikov, C.T. Reimann, and I.V. Vorobyova, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 122, 255 (1997).
9. I.V. Vrobyova, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 146, 379 (1998).
10. R.C. Birtcher and S.E. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4374 (1996).
11. K. Nordlund, J. Keinonen, M. Ghaly, and R.S. Averback, Nature (London) 398, 49 (1999).
12. K. Kyuno, D.C. Cahill, R.S. Averback, J. Tarus, and K. Nordlund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4788 (1999).
13. M. Ghaly, K. Nordlund, and R.S. Averback, Philos. Mag. A 79, 795 (1999).
14. M. Ghaly and R.S. Averback, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 364 (1994).
15. T. Aoki, Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University, 2000, http://nishiki.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp/(Formula presented)t-aoki/papers/doctor/index.html
16. R. S. Averback and T. Diaz de la Rubia, in Solid State Physics, edited by H. Ehrenfest and F. Spaepen (Academic Press, New York, 1998), Vol. 51, pp. 281–402.
17. H.H. Andersen, A. Brunelle, S. Della-Negra, J. Depauw, D. Jacquet, Y. Le Beyec, J. Chaumont, and H. Bernas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5433 (1998).
18. I. Yamada, Mater. Chem. Phys. 54, 5 (1998).
19. I. Yamada, J. Matsuo, N. Toyoda, T. Aoki, E. Jones, and Z. Insepov, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 253, 249 (1998).
20. I. Yamada, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 148, 1 (1999).
21. T. Colla, R. Aderjan, R. Kissel, and H. Urbassek, Phys. Rev. B 62, 8487 (2000).
22. E.M. Bringa and R.E. Johnson, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 143, 513 (1998).
23. V.I. Shulga and P. Sigmund, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 47, 236 (1990).
24. R.S. Averback, T.D. de la Rubia, H. Hsieh, and R. Benedek, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 59/60, 709 (1991).
25. M. Ghaly and R.S. Averback, in Beam-Solid Interactions: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by M. A. Nastasi, L. R. Harriott, N. Herbots, and R. S. Averback, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 279 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1993), p. 17.
26. Z.A. Insepov and B.Z.Kabdiev, Physics and Chemistry of Finite Systems: From Clusters to Crystals, edited by P. Jena, S. N. Khanna, and B. K. Rao, NATO ASI Series C, Vol. 374 (Kluger Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992), Vol. 1, p. 429.
27. Z. Insepov and I. Yamada, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 112, 16 (1996).
28. T. Aoki, J. Matsuo, Z. Insepov, and I. Yamada, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 121, 49 (1997).
29. Z. Insepov, R. Manory, J. Matsuo, and I. Yamada, Phys. Rev. B 61, 8744 (2000).
30. K. Nordlund, L. Wei, Y. Zhong, and R.S. Averback, Phys. Rev. B 57, 13 965 (1998).
31. D. Gault, J.E. Guest, J.B. Murray, D. Dzurisin, and M. Malin, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2444 (1975).
32. C. W. Lampson, Effects of Impact and Explosion (Office of Scientific Research and Development, Washington, D.C., 1946), Vol. 1, Pt. 2, Chap. 3, p. 110.
33. S. Quinones and L. Murr, Phys. Status Solidi A 166, 763 (1998).
34. Impact and Explosion Cratering, edited by D.J. Roddy and O. Pepin (Pergamon Press, New York, 1977).
35. S.E. Donnelly and R.C. Birtcher, Phys. Rev. B 56, 13 599 (1997).
36. R. Birtcher, S. Donnelly, and S. Schlutig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4968 (2000).
37. K. Nordlund, M. Ghaly, R.S. Averback, M. Caturla, T. Diaz de la Rubia, and J. Tarus, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7556 (1998).
38. K. Nordlund, J. Keinonen, M. Ghaly, and R.S. Averback, Nature (London) 398, 49 (1999).
39. H.H. Andersen, Appl. Phys. 18, 131 (1979).
40. S.M. Foiles, M.I. Baskes, and M.S. Daw, Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).
41. J.F. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (Pergamon, New York, 1985).
42. M.S. Daw, S.M. Foiles, and M.I. Baskes, Mater. Sci. Rep. 9, 251 (1993).
43. F.A. Lindemann, Phys. Z. 11, 609 (1910).
44. K. Nordlund, Comput. Mater. Sci. 3, 448 (1995).
45. J.F. Ziegler, 2000, SRIM-2000.39 computer code (private communication).
46. R.S. Averback and M. Ghaly, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3908 (1994).
47. D.A. Thompson and S.S. Johar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 342 (1979).
48. This estimate neglects the energy barrier needed for the outflow, which is expected to be much lower than the binding energy. If the barrier (Formula presented) is known, then (Formula presented) should be multiplied by (Formula presented).
49. Because the most recent evidence indicates that energy transfer to the electronic subsystem occurs over time scales longer than those active in cascades, the electronic heat conductivity can be neglected at least as a first approximation. See Refs. 60.
50. Y. Yamamura, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 194, 515 (1982).
51. I. Bitensky and E. Parillis, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 21, 26 (1987).
52. E.M. Bringa, R. Papaleo, and R.E. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
53. This argument relies on the observation that the melting point scales linearly with the inverse of the cohesive energy, as it does in the simple modification of the potential used here. However, we have earlier found that by modifying only the repulsive part of the interatomic potential, the melting point can be modified with no change in the cohesive energy (Ref. 30). Although it would be of some interest to examine the crater size scaling for such a change, this is not directly instructive for the main point of the present paper, namely the comparison with macroscopic scaling laws, and hence will not be done here.
54. T. Seki, T. Aoki, M. Tanomura, J. Matsuo, and I. Yamada, Mater. Chem. Phys. 54, 143 (1997).
55. N.H. March, Philos. Mag. A 80, 1335 (2000).
56. D. Fenyö and R.E. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B 46, 5090 (1992).
57. R.E. Johnson, B.U. Sundqvist, A. Hedin, and D. Fenyö, Phys. Rev. B 40, 49 (1989).
58. E.M. Bringa and R.E. Johnson, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 152, 267 (1999).
59. E.M. Bringa, R.E. Johnson, and M. Jakas, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 107 (1999).
60. A.E. Stuchbery and E. Bezakova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3637 (1999).