Conserved molecular structure of the centromeric histone CENH3 in Secale and its phylogenetic relationships

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Evtushenko, E V ^a   Elisafenko, E A ^b   Gatzkaya, S S ^a   Lipikhina, Y A ^a   Houben, A ^c   Vershinin, A V ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE;

ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CENTROMERE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; HORDEUM; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY; PLANT CHROMOSOME; SECALE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; WHEAT;

ALTERNATIVE SPLICING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; HISTONES; HORDEUM; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHYLOGENY; SECALE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TRITICUM;

EID: 85038247090     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17932-8     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. De Rop, V., Padeganeh, A. & Maddox, P. S. CENP-A: The key player behind centromere identity, propagation, and kinetochore assembly. Chromosoma 121, 527-538 (2012).
2. Comai, L., Maheshwari, S. & Marimuthu, P. A. Plant centromeres. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 36, 158-167 (2017).
3. Allshire, R. C. & Karpen, G. H. Epigenetic regulation of centromeric chromatin: old dogs, new tracks? Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 923-937 (2008).
4. Maheshwari, S. et al. Naturally occurring differences in CENH3 affect chromosome segregation in zygotic mitosis of hybrids. PLoS Genet. 11(1), e1004970, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004970 (2015).
5. Neumann, P. et al. Centromeres off the hook: massive changes in centromere size and structure following duplication of CenH3 gene in Fabeae species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1862-1879 (2015).
6. Vermaak, D., Hayden, H. S. & Henikoff, S. Centromere targeting element within the histone fold domain of Cid. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 7553-7561 (2002).
7. Malik, H. S. & Henikoff, S. Adaptive evolution of Cid, a centromere-specific histone in Drosophila. Genetics 157, 1293-1298 (2001).
8. Talbert, P. B., Masuelli, R., Tyagi, A. P., Comai, L. & Henikoff, S. Centromeric localization and adaptive evolution of an Arabidopsis histone H3 variant. Plant Cell 14, 1053-1066 (2002).
9. Hirsch, C. D., Wu, Y., Yan, H. & Jiang, J. Lineage-specific adaptive evolution of the centromeric protein CENH3 in diploid and allotetraploid Oryza species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 2877-2885 (2009).
10. Finseth, F. R., Dong, Y., Saunders, A. & Fishman, L. Duplication and adaptive evolution of a key centromeric protein in Mimulus, a genus with female meiotic drive. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2694-2706 (2015).
11. Zhong, C. X. et al. Centromeric retroelements and satellites interact with maize kinetochore protein CENH3. Plant Cell 14, 2825-2836 (2002).
12. Nagaki, K. et al. Sequencing of a rice centromere uncovers active genes. Nat. Genet. 36, 138-145 (2004).
13. Yuan, J., Guo, X., Hu, J., Lv, Z. & Han, F. Characterization of two CENH3 genes and their roles in wheat evolution. New Phytol. 206, 839-851 (2015).
14. Sanei, M., Pickering, R., Kumke, K., Nasuda, S. & Houben, A. Loss of centromeric histone H3 (CENH3) from centromeres precedes uniparental chromosome elimination in interspecific barley hybrids. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 498-505 (2011).
15. Ishii, T. et al. The differential loading of two barley CENH3 variants into distinct centromeric substructures is cell type and development-specific. Chromosome Res. 23, 277-284 (2015).
16. Tang, Z. X. et al. Secale in Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Cereals (ed Kole, C.) 367-396 (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14228-4-8, (2011).
17. Sencer, H. A. & Hawkes, J. G. On the origin of cultivated rye. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13, 299-313 (1980).
18. Frederiksen, S. & Petersen, G. A taxonomic revision of Secale (Triticeae, Poaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 18, 399-420 (1998).
19. Chikmawati, T., Schovmand, B. & Gustafson, J. P. Phylogenetic relatioships in Secale revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Genome 48, 792-801 (2005).
20. Chebotar, S. et al. Molecular studies on genetic integrity of open-pollinating species rye (Secale cereale L.) after long-Term genebank maintenance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 1469-1476 (2003).
21. Bell, G. D. H. The comparative phylogeny of the temperate cereals in Essays on Crop PlantEvolution (ed Hutchinson, J.) 70-102 (Cambridge Univ. Press, London 1965).
22. McDonald, J. H. & Kreitman, M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351, 652-654 (1991).
23. Black, B. E. et al. Structural determinants for generating centromeric chromatin. Nature 430, 578-582 (2004).
24. Martis, M. et al. Reticulate Evolution of the Rye Genome. Plant Cell 25, 3685-3698 (2013).
25. Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G. & Ast, G. Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 345-355 (2010).
26. Murat, F., Pont, C. & Salse, J. Paleogenomics in Triticeae for translational research. Curr. Plant Biol. 1, 34-39 (2014).
27. Karimi-Ashtiyani, R. et al. Point mutation impairs centromeric CENH3 loading and induces haploid plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11211-11216 (2015).
28. Blattner, F. R. Phylogenetic analysis of Hordeum (Poaceae) as inferred by nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33, 289-299 (2004).
29. Middleton, C. P. et al. Sequencing of chloroplast genomes from wheat, barley, rye and their relatives provides a detailed insight into the evolution of the Triticeae tribe. PLoS ONE 9(3), e85761 (2014).
30. Chalupska, D. et al. Acc homoeoloci and the evolution of wheat genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 9691-9696 (2008).
31. Martis, M. et al. Selfish supernumerary chromosome reveals its origin as a mosaic of host genome and organellar sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 13343-13346 (2012).
32. Khush, G. S. Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies in Secale. III. Cytogenetics of weedy ryes and origin of cultivated rye. Econ. Bot. 17, 60-71 (1963).
33. Stutz, H. C. On the origin of cultivated rye. Am. J. Bot. 59, 59-70 (1972).
34. Escobar, J. S. et al. Multigenic phylogeny and analysis of tree incongruences in Triticeae (Poaceae). BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 181, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-181 (2011).
35. Tachiwana, H., Kagawa, W. & Kurumizaka, H. Comparison between the CENP-A and histone H3 structures in nucleosomes. Nucleus 3, 6-11 (2012).
36. Kriventseva, E. V. et al. Increase of functional diversity by alternative splicing. Trends Genet. 19, 124-128 (2003).
37. Pingault, L. et al. Deep transcriptome sequencing provides new insights into the structural and functional organization of the wheat genome. Genome Biol. 16, 29, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0601-9 (2015).
38. Nagaki, K., Kashihara, K. & Murata, M. Visualization of diffuse centromeres with centromere-specific histone H3 in the holocentric plant Luzula nivea. Plant Cell 17, 1886-1893 (2005).
39. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
40. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7, 539, https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.75 (2011).
41. Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189-1191 (2009).
42. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725-2729 (2013).
43. Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSPv5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451-1452 (2009).