Point mutation impairs centromeric CENH3 loading and induces haploid plants

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 36, 2015, Pages 11211-11216

  Karimi Ashtiyani, Raheleh ^a   Ishii, Takayoshi ^a   Niessen, Markus ^b   Stein, Nils ^a   Heckmann, Stefan ^a,c   Gurushidze, Maia ^a   Banaei Moghaddam, Ali Mohammad ^a,d   Fuchs, Jörg ^a   Schubert, Veit ^a   Koch, Kerstin ^b   Weiss, Oda ^a   Demidov, Dmitri ^a   Schmidt, Klaus ^b   Kumlehn, Jochen ^a   Houben, Andreas ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^b KWS SAAT SE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

CENH3 loading; CENH3 mutant; Chromosome elimination; Haploid induction; Plant breeding

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CENTROMERE PROTEIN A; AUTOANTIGEN; HISTONE; NONHISTONE PROTEIN; PLANT PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; BARLEY; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HAPLOIDY; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SUGAR BEET; ARABIDOPSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HORDEUM; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PLANT SEED; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSGENIC PLANT; ULTRASTRUCTURE; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ARABIDOPSIS; AUTOANTIGENS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; GENOTYPE; HAPLOIDY; HISTONES; HORDEUM; KINETOCHORES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; POINT MUTATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEEDS;

EID: 84941243898     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504333112     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dunwell JM (2010) Haploids in flowering plants: Origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnol J 8(4):377-424.
2. Ravi M, Chan SW (2010) Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 464(7288):615-618.
3. Ravi M, et al. (2014) A haploid genetics toolbox for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Commun 5:5334.
4. Maheshwari S, et al. (2015) Naturally occurring differences in CENH3 affect chromosome segregation in zygotic mitosis of hybrids. PLoS Genet 11(1):e1004970.
5. Gottwald S, Bauer P, Komatsuda T, Lundqvist U, Stein N (2009) TILLING in the tworowed barley cultivar 'Barke' reveals preferred sites of functional diversity in the gene HvHox1. BMC Res Notes 2:258.
6. Sanei M, Pickering R, Kumke K, Nasuda S, Houben A (2011) Loss of centromeric histone H3 (CENH3) from centromeres precedes uniparental chromosome elimination in interspecific barley hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(33):E498-E505.
7. Ishii T, et al. (2015) The differential loading of two barley CENH3 variants into distinct centromeric substructures is cell type- and development-specific. Chromosome Res 23(2):277-284, 10.1007/s10577-015-9466-8.
8. Bassett EA, et al. (2012) HJURP uses distinct CENP-A surfaces to recognize and to stabilize CENP-A/histone H4 for centromere assembly. Dev Cell 22(4):749-762.
9. Foltz DR, et al. (2009) Centromere-specific assembly of CENP-a nucleosomes is mediated by HJURP. Cell 137(3):472-484.
10. Bai Y, Zhou Z, Feng H, Zhou BR (2011) Recognition of centromeric histone variant CenH3s by their chaperones: Structurally conserved or not. Cell Cycle 10(19):3217-3218.
11. Thomas PJ, Qu BH, Pedersen PL (1995) Defective protein folding as a basis of human disease. Trends Biochem Sci 20(11):456-459.
12. Moreno-Moreno O, Medina-Giró S, Torras-Llort M, Azorín F (2011) The F box protein partner of paired regulates stability of Drosophila centromeric histone H3, CenH3 (CID). Curr Biol 21(17):1488-1493.
13. Ingouff M, et al. (2010) Zygotic resetting of the HISTONE 3 variant repertoire participates in epigenetic reprogramming in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 20(23):2137-2143.
14. Gernand D, et al. (2005) Uniparental chromosome elimination at mitosis and interphase in wheat and pearl millet crosses involves micronucleus formation, progressive heterochromatinization, and DNA fragmentation. Plant Cell 17(9):2431-2438.
15. Puchta H, Fauser F (2014) Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: Prospects for a bright future. Plant J 78(5):727-741.
16. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162(1):156-159.
17. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C (T) method. Nat Protoc 3(6):1101-1108.
18. Ravi M, et al. (2010) The rapidly evolving centromere-specific histone has stringent functional requirements in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 186(2):461-471.
19. Heckmann S, et al. (2011) The E2F transcription factor family regulates CENH3 expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 68(4):646-656.
20. Lermontova I, et al. (2006) Loading of Arabidopsis centromeric histone CENH3 occurs mainly during G2 and requires the presence of the histone fold domain. Plant Cell 18(10):2443-2451.
21. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16(6):735-743.
22. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473-497.
23. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19(6):1349.
24. Gendrel AV, Lippman Z, Martienssen R, Colot V (2005) Profiling histone modification patterns in plants using genomic tiling microarrays. Nat Methods 2(3):213-218.
25. Schägger H, Von Jagow G (1987) Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166(2):368-379.
26. Galbraith DW, et al. (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220(4601):1049-1051.
27. Pickering RA, Morgan PW (1985) The influence of temperature on chromosome elimination during embryo development in crosses involving Hordeum spp., wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rye (Secale cereale L.). Theor Appl Genet 70(2):199-206.
28. Matzk F, Mahn A (1994) Improved techniques for haploid production in wheat using chromosome elimination. Plant Breed 113(2):125-129.
29. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50(1):151-158.
30. Houben A, Sanei M, Pickering R (2011) Barley doubled-haploid production by uniparental chromosome elimination. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104(3):321-327.
31. Kishchenko EM, Komarnitskii IK, Kuchuk NV (2005) Production of transgenetic sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants resistant to phosphinothricin. Cell Biol Int 29(1):15-19.
32. Barow M, Meister A (2003) Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ 26(4):571-584.