Feasibility and reproducibility of feature-tracking-based strain and strain rate measures of the left ventricle in different diseases and genders

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 1415-1425

  Maceira, Alicia M ^a,b   Tuset Sanchis, Luis ^a   López Garrido, Miguel ^c   San Andres, Marta ^a   López Lereu, M Pilar ^a   Monmeneu, Jose V ^a   García González, M Pilar ^a   Higueras, Laura ^a  

^a Hospital General Universitario Avda   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CEU CARDENAL HERRERA   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LA VICTORIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

feasibility; myocardium; reproducibility; strain; strain rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRAIN STRAIN RATE; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLOBAL SYSTOLIC STRAIN STRAIN RATE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LEFT VENTRICULAR STRAIN STRAIN RATE; LONGITUDINAL STRAIN STRAIN RATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE FEATURE TRACKING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL STRAIN STRAIN RATE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART VENTRICLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; CARDIOMYOPATHY, DILATED; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 85038235762     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25894     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim KD, Plana JC, Woo A, Marwick TH. Use of myocardial strain imaging by echocardiography for the early detection of cardiotoxicity in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2751–2768.
2. Sheehan FH. Quantitative evaluation of regional left ventricular systolic function. In: Otto CM, ed. The practice of clinical echocardiography. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2002;65–87.
3. Perk G, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging by echocardiography—from technical considerations to clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;49:1903–1914.
4. Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Marwick TH, Oh JK. Tissue Doppler imaging a new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;20:234–243.
5. Wang J, Khouri DS, Thohan V, Torre-Amione G, Nagueh SF. Global diastolic strain rate for assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressure. Circulation 2007;115:1376–1383.
6. Vartdal T, Brunwand H, Pettersen E, et al. Early prediction of infarct size by strain Doppler echocardiography after coronary reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1715–1721.
7. Jasaityte R, Heyde B, D'Hooge J. Current state of three-dimensional myocardial strain estimation using echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:15–28.
8. Marwick TH. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1313–1327.
9. Lin K, Chowdhary V, Benzuly KH, et al. Reproducibility and observer variability of tissue phase mapping for the quantification of regional myocardial velocities. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;32:1227–1234.
10. Schuster A, Stahnke VC, Unterberg-Buchwald C, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature-tracking assessment of myocardial mechanics: Intervendor agreement and considerations regarding reproducibility. Clin Radiol 2015;70:989–998.
11. Rapezzi C, Arbustini E, Caforio AL, et al. Diagnostic work-up in cardiomyopathies: bridging the gap. A position statement from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2013;34:1448–1458.
12. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1787–1847.
13. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2013;34:2159–2219.
14. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:417–426.
15. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949–3003.
16. American Diabetes Association Position Statement: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2010. Diabetes Care 2010;33:S11–61.
17. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Bairey CN, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III guidelines. Circulation 2004;110:227–239.
18. Klinke V, Muzzarelli S, Lauriers N, et al. Quality assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the setting of the European CMR registry: description and validation of standardized criteria. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:55.
19. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Circulation 2002;105:539–542.
20. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000;491–508.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;8:307–310.
22. Schuster A, Paul M, Bettencourt N, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for quantitative viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:413–420.
23. Schuster A, Kutty S, Padivath A, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:58.
24. Buss SJ, Breuninger K, Lehrke S, et al. Assessment of myocardial deformation with cardiac magnetic resonance strain imaging improves risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:307–315.
25. Dick A, Schmidt B, Michels G, et al. Left and right atrial feature tracking in acute myocarditis: A feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2017;89:72–80.
26. Orwat S, Kempny A, Diller GP, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking: A novel method of assessing myocardial strain. Comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking in healthy volunteers and in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Kardiol Polska 2014;72:363–371.
27. Taylor RJ, Moody WE, Umar F, et al. Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: normal values. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:871–881.
28. Andre F, Steen H, Matheis P, et al. Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:25.
29. Buccheri S, Monte I, Mangiafico S, Bottari V, Leggio S, Tamburino C. Feasibility, reproducibility, and agreement between different speckle tracking echocardiographic techniques for the assessment of longitudinal deformation. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:297895.
30. Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Angelsen B, Smiseth OA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation 2000;102:1158–1164.
31. Singh A, Steadman CD, Khan JN, Nazir SA, Kanagala P, McCan GP. Inter-study reproducibility of circumferential strain and strain rates at 1.5T and 3T: a comparison of tagging and feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16(Suppl 1):P354.
32. Morton G, Schuster A, Jogiya R, Kutty S, Beerbaum P, Nagel E. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:43.
33. Schuster A, Morton G, Hussain ST, et al. The intraobserver reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:296–301.
34. Cheng S, Larson MG, McCabe EL, et al. Reproducibility of speckle-tracking based strain measures of left ventricular function in a community-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:1258–1266.
35. Langeland S, D'Hooge J, Wouters PF, et al. Experimental validation of a new ultrasound method for the simultaneous assessment of radial and longitudinal myocardial deformation independent of insonation angle. Circulation 2005;112:2157–2162.
36. Korinek J, Wang J, Sengupta PP, et al. Two-dimensional strain—a Doppler-independent ultrasound method for quantitation of regional deformation: validation in vitro and in vivo. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1247–1253.
37. Schuster A, Hor KN, Kowallick JT, Beerbaum P, Kutty. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: concepts and clinical applications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:e004077.
38. Kowallick J, Morton G, Lamata P, et al. Inter-study reproducibility of left ventricular torsion and torsion rate quantification using MR myocardial feature tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;43:128–137.
39. Mavinkurve-Groothuis AM, Weijers G, Groot-Loonen J, et al. Interobserver, intraobserver and intrapatient reliability scores of myocardial strain imaging with 2-D echocardiography in patients treated with anthracyclines. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:697–704
40. Singh A, Steadman CD, Khan JN, et al. Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: A comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1129–1137.
41. Schmidt B, Dick A, Treutlein M, et al. Intra and interobserver reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle. Eur J Radiol 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
42. Leitman M, Lysiansky M, Lysyansky P, et al. Circumferential and longitudinal strain in 3 myocardial layers in normal subjects and in patients with regional left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:64–70.