Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Normal values

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 871-881

  Taylor, Robin J ^a,b   Moody, William E ^a,b   Umar, Fraz ^a,b   Edwards, Nicola C ^a,b   Taylor, Tiffany J ^b   Stegemann, Berthold ^c   Townend, John N ^a,b   Hor, Kan N ^d   Steeds, Richard P ^a,b   Mazur, Wojciech ^e   Leyva, Francisco ^a,b  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c MEDTRONIC BAKKEN RESEARCH CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d NATIONWIDE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e CHRIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Feature tracking; Inter study variability; Normal values; Strain

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ENDOCARDIUM; EPICARDIUM; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDSYSTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MYOCARDIAL STRAIN; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART PERFORMANCE; HEART VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PEAK SYSTOLIC CIRCUMFERENTIAL STRAIN; PEAK SYSTOLIC LONGITUDINAL STRAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECKLE TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SYSTOLE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART CONTRACTION; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84942089775     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: 20472412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Sutherland GR, Stewart MJ, Groundstroem KW, Moran CM, Fleming A, Guell-Peris FJ et al. Color doppler myocardial imaging: a new technique for the assessment of myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994;7:441-58.
2. Nagueh SF, Bachinski LL, Meyer D, Hill R, ZoghbiWA, Tam JW et al. Tissue doppler imaging consistently detects myocardial abnormalities in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and provides a novel means for an early diagnosis before and independently of hypertrophy. Circulation 2001;104:128-30.
3. Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC, Smiseth OA. Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans. Circulation 2002;106:50-6.
4. Miyatake K, Yamagishi M, Tanaka N, Uematsu M, Yamazaki N, Mine Y et al. New method for evaluating left ventricular wall motion by color-coded tissue doppler imaging: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:717-24.
5. Castro PL, Greenberg NL, Drinko J, Garcia MJ, Thomas JD. Potential pitfalls of strain rate imaging: angle dependency. Biomed Sci Instrum 2000;36:197-202.
6. Amundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Crosby J, Lyseggen E et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:789-93.
7. Axel L, Dougherty L. Mr imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization. Radiology 1989;171:841-5.
8. Osman NF, Prince JL. Visualizing myocardial function using HARP MRI. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:1665-82.
9. Kraitchman DL, Sampath S, Castillo E, Derbyshire JA, Boston RC, Bluemke DA et al. Quantitative ischemia detection during cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing by use of fastharp. Circulation 2003;107:2025-30.
10. Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C,Wash E, Cnota J, Fleck R et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2010;3:144-51.
11. Moody WE, Taylor RJ, Edwards NC, Chue CD, Umar F, Taylor TJ et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for systolic and diastolic strain and strain rate calculation with spatial modulation of magnetization imaging analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014: [E-pub ahead of print].
12. Moody WE, Tomlinson LA, Ferro CJ, Steeds RP, Mark PB, ZehnderDet al. Effect of a reduction in glomerular filtration rate after nephrectomy on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics: rationale and design of the earnest study. Am Heart J 2014; 167:141-149.e142.
13. Qriskw2-2012 cardiovascular disease risk calculator. http://qrisk.org.
14. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, VinogradovaY, Robson J, Minhas R, SheikhAet al. Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of qrisk2. BMJ 2008;336:1475-82.
15. Maceira A, Prasad S, Khan M, Pennell D. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006;8:417-26.
16. Mosteller R. Simplified calculation of body-surface area.NEngl JMed1987;317:1098.
17. Hor KN, Baumann R, Pedrizzetti G, Tonti G, Gottliebson WM, Taylor M et al. Magnetic resonance derived myocardial strain assessment using feature tracking. J Vis Exp 2011:2356-61.
18. Bohs LN, Geiman BJ, Anderson ME, Gebhart SC, Trahey GE. Speckle tracking for multi-dimensional flow estimation. Ultrasonics 2000;38:369-75.
19. Schuster A, Kutty S, Padiyath A, Parish V, Gribben P, DanfordDet al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:58.
20. Schuster A, Paul M, Bettencourt N, Morton G, Chiribiri A, Ishida Met al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for quantitative viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:413-20.
21. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, Belohlavek M, Cardim NM, Derumeaux G et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: Ase/eae consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the japanese society of echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12: 167-205.
22. Marwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun J-P, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P et al. Myocardial strain measurement with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: definition of normal range. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:80-4.
23. Park TH, Nagueh SF, Khoury DS, Kopelen HA, Akrivakis S, Nasser K et al. Impact of myocardial structure and function postinfarction on diastolic strain measurements: Implications for assessment of myocardial viability.AmJ Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 290:H724-731.
24. Kane GC, Karon BL, MahoneyDW, Redfield MM, Roger VL, Burnett JC Jr et al. Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure. JAMA 2011; 306:856-63.
25. YingchoncharoenT, Agarwal S, Popovic ZB, Marwick TH. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:185-91.
26. Morton G, Schuster A, Jogiya R, Kutty S, Beerbaum P, Nagel E. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:43.
27. Augustine D, Lewandowski AJ, Lazdam M, Rai A, Francis J, Myerson S et al. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:8.
28. Kleijn SA, Pandian NG, Thomas JD, Perez de Isla L, Kamp O, Zuber M et al. Normal reference values of left ventricular strain using three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: results from a multicentre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014 [E-pub ahead of print].
29. Yoneyama K, Gjesdal O, Choi E-Y,WuCO, Hundley WG, Gomes AS et al. Age, sex, and hypertension-related remodeling influences left ventricular torsion assessed by tagged cardiac magnetic resonance in asymptomatic individuals: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation 2012;126:2481-90.
30. Kuznetsova T, Herbots L, Richart T, D'hooge J, Thijs L, FagardRHet al. Left ventricular strain and strain rate in a general population. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2014-23.
31. Dalen H, Thorstensen A, Aase SA, Ingul CB, Torp H, Vatten LJ et al. Segmental and global longitudinal strain and strain rate based on echocardiography of 1266 healthy individuals: the hunt study in Norway. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11: 176-83.
32. Harrild DM, Han Y, Geva T, Zhou J, Marcus E, Powell AJ. Comparison of cardiac MRI tissue tracking and myocardial tagging for assessment of regional ventricular strain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:2009-18.
33. Wu L, Germans T, Guclu A, Heymans MW, Allaart CP, van Rossum AC. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:10.
34. Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim KD, Plana JC,Woo A, Marwick TH. Use of myocardial strain imaging by echocardiography for the early detectionof cardiotoxicity in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2751-68.
35. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, Ewer MS, Ky B, Scherrer-CrosbieMet al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15: 1063-93.
36. Moore CC, Lugo-Olivieri CH, McVeigh ER, Zerhouni EA. Three-dimensional systolic strain patterns in the normal human left ventricle: characterization with tagged MR imaging. Radiology 2000;214:453-66.