Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 tesla: A comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1129-1137

  Singh, Anvesha ^a,b   Steadman, Christopher D ^c   Khan, Jamal N ^a,b   Horsfield, Mark A ^a   Bekele, Soliana ^a   Nazir, Sheraz A ^a,b   Kanagala, Prathap ^a,b   Masca, Nicholas G D ^a   Clarysse, Patrick ^d   McCann, Gerry P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b GLENFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c POOLE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; Cardiac MRI; feature tracking; tagging

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MUSCLE STRAIN; MYOCARDIAL STRAIN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PEAK EARLY DIASTOLIC STRAIN RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEADY STATE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ALGORITHM; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIASTOLE; ELASTOGRAPHY; ETIOLOGY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; DIASTOLE; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84925342750     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24625     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ng AC, Delgado V, Bertini M, et al. Alterations in multidirectional myocardial functions in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction: a two-dimensional speckle tracking analysis. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 1542-1550.
2. Morris DA, Boldt LH, Eichstadt H, Ozcelik C, Haverkamp W,. Myocardial systolic and diastolic performance derived by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2012; 5: 610-620.
3. Abozguia K, Nallur-Shivu G, Phan TT, et al. Left ventricular strain and untwist in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: relation to exercise capacity. Am Heart J 2010; 159: 825-832.
4. Antoni ML, Mollema SA, Delgado V, et al. Prognostic importance of strain and strain rate after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1640-1647.
5. Lafitte S, Perlant M, Reant P, et al. Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 414-419.
6. Ibrahim el SH,. Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques - pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13: 36.
7. Hor KN, Baumann R, Pedrizzetti G, et al. Magnetic resonance derived myocardial strain assessment using feature tracking. J Vis Exp 2011; 10. 3791 /2356.
8. Hor KN, Gottliebson WM, Carson C, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 144-151.
9. Schuster A, Kutty S, Padiyath A, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13: 58.
10. Schuster A, Paul M, Bettencourt N, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for quantitative viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2013; 166: 413-420.
11. Morton G, Schuster A, Jogiya R, Kutty S, Beerbaum P, Nagel E,. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 43.
12. Steadman CD, Jerosch-Herold M, Grundy B, et al. Determinants and functional significance of myocardial perfusion reserve in severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 182-189.
13. Miller CA, Borg A, Clark D, et al. Comparison of local sine wave modeling with harmonic phase analysis for the assessment of myocardial strain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 38: 320-328.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG,. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
15. McGraw KO, Wong SP,. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996; 1: 30-46.
16. Augustine D, Lewandowski AJ, Lazdam M, et al. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 8.
17. Harrild DM, Han Y, Geva T, Zhou J, Marcus E, Powell AJ,. Comparison of cardiac MRI tissue tracking and myocardial tagging for assessment of regional ventricular strain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28: 2009-2018.
18. Schuster A, Morton G, Hussain ST, et al. The intraobserver reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 296-301.
19. Valeti VU, Chun W, Potter DD, et al. Myocardial tagging and strain analysis at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1.5 Tesla imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 477-480.
20. Kuijer JP, Jansen E, Marcus JT, van Rossum AC, Heethaar RM,. Improved harmonic phase myocardial strain maps. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 993-939.
21. Dweck MR, Joshi S, Murigu T, et al. Left ventricular remodelling and hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 50.
22. Fischer SE, McKinnon GC, Maier SE, Boesiger P,. Improved myocardial tagging contrast. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30: 191-200.
23. Swoboda PP, Larghat A, Zaman A, et al. Reproducibility of myocardial strain and left ventricular twist measured using complementary spatial modulation of magnetization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39: 887-894.
24. Gotte MJ, Germans T, Russel IK, et al. Myocardial strain and torsion quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue tagging: studies in normal and impaired left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2002-2011.