Learning Supervised Topic Models from Crowds

Proceedings of the 3rd AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, HCOMP 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 160-168

  Rodrigues, Filipe ^a   Ribeiro, Bernardete ^a   Lourenço, Mariana ^a   Pereira, Francisco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFERENCE ENGINES; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

COLLECTION OF DOCUMENTS; HIGH VOLUMES; INFERENCE ALGORITHM; LARGE DATASETS; REAL-WORLD; RELATED VARIABLES; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH; STOCHASTICS; TOPIC MODELING; VARIATIONAL INFERENCE;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 85038210849     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1609/hcomp.v3i1.13221     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Airoldi, E.; Blei, D.; Fienberg, S.; and Xing, E. 2007. Combining stochastic block models and mixed membership for statistical network analysis. In Statistical Network Analysis: Models, Issues, and New Directions. Springer. 57–74.
2. Blei, D.; Ng, A.; and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.
3. Bosch, A.; Zisserman, A.; and Muñoz, X. 2006. Scene classification via plsa. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Springer. 517–530.
4. Dawid, A. P., and Skene, A. M. 1979. Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error-rates using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C 28(1):20–28.
5. Erosheva, E.; Fienberg, S.; and Joutard, C. 2007. Describing disability through individual-level mixture models for multivariate binary data. The annals of applied statistics 1(2):346.
6. Fei-Fei, L., and Perona, P. 2005. A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 2, 524–531. IEEE.
7. Hoffman, M.; Blei, D.; Wang, C.; and Paisley, J. 2013. Stochastic variational inference. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14(1):1303–1347.
8. Jordan, M. I.; Ghahramani, Z.; Jaakkola, T.; and Saul, L. 1999. An introduction to variational methods for graphical models. Mach. Learn. 37(2):183–233.
9. Lacoste-Julien, S.; Sha, F.; and Jordan, M. 2009. Disclda: Discriminative learning for dimensionality reduction and classification. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 897–904.
10. Lang, K. 1995. Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, 331–339.
11. Lewis, D.; Yang, Y.; Rose, T.; and Li, F. 2004. Rcv1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5:361–397.
12. Lewis, D. 1997. Reuters-21578 text categorization test collection, distribution 1.0.
13. Lowe, D. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on computer vision, volume 2, 1150–1157. Ieee.
14. Mcauliffe, J., and Blei, D. 2008. Supervised topic models. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 121–128.
15. Niebles, J.; Wang, H.; and Fei-Fei, L. 2008. Unsupervised learning of human action categories using spatial-temporal words. Int. J. Comput. Vision 79(3):299–318.
16. Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. 2006. Numerical Optimization. World Scientific.
17. Ramage, D.; Hall, D.; Nallapati, R.; and Manning, C. 2009. Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 248–256. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Raykar, V.; Yu, S.; Zhao, L.; Valadez, G.; Florin, C.; Bogoni, L.; and Moy, L. 2010. Learning from Crowds. Journal of Machine Learning Research 1297–1322.
19. Robbins, H., and Monro, S. 1951. A stochastic approximation method. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(3):400–407.
20. Rodrigues, F.; Pereira, F.; and Ribeiro, B. 2013. Learning from multiple annotators: distinguishing good from random labelers. Pattern Recognition Letters 1428–1436.
21. Rodrigues, F.; Pereira, F.; and Ribeiro, B. 2014. Gaussian process classification and active learning with multiple annotators. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), 433–441.
22. Russell, B.; Torralba, A.; Murphy, K.; and Freeman, W. 2008. Labelme: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. International journal of computer vision 77(1-3):157–173.
23. Smyth, P.; Fayyad, U.; Burl, M.; Perona, P.; and Baldi, P. 1995. Inferring ground truth from subjective labelling of venus images. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1085–1092.
24. Snow, R.; O’Connor, B.; Jurafsky, D.; and Ng, A. 2008. Cheap and fast - but is it good?: Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proc. of the Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 254–263.
25. Wang, C.; Blei, D.; and Fei-Fei, L. 2009. Simultaneous image classification and annotation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, 1903–1910. IEEE.
26. Welinder, P.; Branson, S.; Perona, P.; and Belongie, S. 2010. The multidimensional wisdom of crowds. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 2424–2432.
27. Yan, Y.; Rosales, R.; Fung, G.; Schmidt, M.; Valadez, G.; Bogoni, L.; Moy, L.; and Dy, J. 2010. Modeling annotator expertise: Learning when everybody knows a bit of something. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9:932–939.
28. Yan, Y.; Rosales, R.; Fung, G.; Subramanian, R.; and Dy, J. 2014. Learning from multiple annotators with varying expertise. Mach. Learn. 95(3):291–327.
29. Zhu, J.; Ahmed, A.; and Xing, E. 2012. Medlda: Maximum margin supervised topic models. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13(1):2237–2278.