Accuracies of univariate and multivariate genomic prediction models in African cassava

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Okeke, Uche Godfrey ^a   Akdemir, Deniz ^a   Rabbi, Ismail ^b   Kulakow, Peter ^b   Jannink, Jean Luc ^a,c  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE   (Nigeria)

^c ROBERT W HOLLEY CENTER FOR AGRICULTURE AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CASSAVA; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MODEL TEST; PARAMETERIZATION; PLANT BREEDING; PREDICTION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

AFRICA;

MANIHOT ESCULENTA;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MANIHOT; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

BREEDING; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MANIHOT; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85037654466     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-017-0361-y     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. The International Plant Names Index (IPNI). http://www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=351790-1. Accessed 31 Oct 2015.
2. Taylor N, Chavarriaga P, Raemakers K, Siritunga D, Zhang P. Development and application of transgenic technologies in cassava. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;56:671-88.
3. Moorthy SN. Physicochemical and functional properties of tropical tuber starches: A review. Starch. 2002;54:559-92.
4. Balagopalan C. Cassava utilization in food, feed and industry. In: Hillocks RJ, Thresh JM, Bellotti AC, editors. Cassava: biology, production and utilization. Wallingford: CAB International; 2002. p. 301-18.
5. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975;31:423-47.
6. Henderson CR. Estimation of variances and covariances under multiple trait models. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1581-9.
7. Smith HF. A discriminant function of plant selection. Ann Hum Genet. 1936;7:240-50.
8. Hazel LN. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics. 1943;28:476-90.
9. Ducrocq V, Wiggans G. Genetic improvement of cattle. In: Garrick DJ, Ruvinsky A, editors. The genetics of cattle. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI; 2015. p. 371-96.
10. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
11. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:433-43.
12. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19379.
13. Segelke D, Reinhardt F, Liu Z, Thaller G. Prediction of expected genetic variation within groups of offspring for innovative mating schemes. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:42.
14. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-Assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2008;177:2389-97.
15. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:2737-46.
16. Goddard M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 2009;136:245-57.
17. van der Werf J, van Arendonk JAM, De Vries AG. Improving selection of pigs using correlated characters. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the European federation of animal science (EAAP), 14-17 September 1992, Madrid. 1992.
18. Ducrocq V. Multiple trait prediction: principles and problems. In: Proceedings of the 5th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, 7-12 August 1994, Guelph. 1994.
19. Colleau JJ, Ducrocq V, Boichard D, Larroque H. Approximate multi-Trait BLUP evaluation to combine functional traits information. Interbull Bull. 1999;23:1-9.
20. Schaeffer LR. Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. J Dairy Sci. 1994;77:2671-8.
21. Schaeffer LR. Multiple trait international bull comparisons. Livest Prod Sci. 2001;69:145-53.
22. Thompson R, Meyer K. A review of theoretical aspects in the estimation of breeding values for multi-Trait selection. Livest Prod Sci. 1986;15:299-313.
23. Smith A, Cullis B, Thompson R. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics. 2001;57:1138-47.
24. Falconer DS. The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat. 1952;86:293-8.
25. Malosetti M, Ribaut JM, van Eeuwijk FA. The statistical analysis of multienvironment data: modelling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. In: Monneveux P, Ribaut JM, Okono A, editors. Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice, vol 4. Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media, SA; 2014. p. 53-69.
26. Crossa J, Burgueño J, Cornelius PL, McLaren G, Trethowan R, Krishnamachari A. Modeling genotype × environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 2006;46:1722-33.
27. Burgueño J, Crossa J, Cornelius PL, Yang RC. Using factor analytic models for joining environments and genotypes without crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 2008;48:1291-305.
28. Burgueño J, Crossa J, Miguel Cotes J, San Vicente F, Das B. Prediction assessment of linear mixed models for multienvironment trials. Crop Sci. 2011;51:944-54.
29. Burgueño J, de los Campos G, Weigel K, Crossa J. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype × environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 2012;52:707-19.
30. de los Campos G, Gianola D. Factor analysis models for structuring covariance matrices of additive genetic effects: A Bayesian implementation. Genet Sel Evol. 2007;39:481-94.
31. Meyer K. Factor-Analytic models for genotype x environment type problems and structured covariance matrices. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:21.
32. Tsuruta S, Lourenco DAL, Misztal I, Lawlor TJ. Genotype by environment interactions on culling rates and 305-day milk yield of Holstein cows in 3 US regions. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:5796-805.
33. Kolmodin R, Strandberg F, Madsen P, Jensen J, Jorjiani H. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agric Scand Anim Sci. 2002;52:11-24.
34. Windig JJ, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF. Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:335-47.
35. Cooper M, DeLacy IH. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theor Appl Genet. 1994;88:561-72.
36. Ducrocq V, Boichard D, Barbat A, Larroque H. Implementation of an approximate multi-Trait BLUP evaluation to combine production traits and functional traits into a total merit index. In: Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the European association for animal production, 26-29 August 2001, Budapest; 2001.
37. Lassen J, Sørensen MK, Madsen P, Ducrocq V. A stochastic simulation study on validation of an approximate multitrait model using preadjusted data for prediction of breeding values. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3002-11.
38. Lassen J, Sørensen MK, Madsen P, Ducrocq V. An approximate multi-Trait model for genetic evaluation in dairy cattle with a robust estimation of genetic trends. Genet Sel Evol. 2007;39:353-67.
39. Maziya-Dixon B, Dixon AGO, Adebowale ARA. Targeting different end uses of cassava: genotypic variations for cyanogenic potentials and pasting properties. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2007;42:969-76.
40. Okechukwu RU, Dixon AGO. Genetic gains from 30 years of cassava breeding in Nigeria for storage root yield and disease resistance in elite cassava genotypes. J Crop Improv. 2008;22:181-208.
41. Ly D, Hamblin M, Rabbi I, Melaku G, Bakare M, Gauch HG Jr, et al. Relatedness and genotype × environment interaction affect prediction accuracies in genomic selection: A study in cassava. Crop Sci. 2013;53:1312-25.
42. Glaubitz J, Casstevens T, Elshire R, Harriman J, Buckler ES. TASSEL 3.0 genotyping by sequencing (GBS) pipeline documentation. Edward S. Buckler. Ithaca: USDA-ARS. 2012. http://www.maizegenetics.net/tassel/docs/TasselPipelineGBS.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2014.
43. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1178-86.
44. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33:1-22.
45. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. 2013.
46. Rutkoski J, Benson J, Jia Y, Brown-Guedira G, Jannink JL, Sorrells M. Evaluation of genomic prediction methods for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Plant Genome. 2012;5:51-61.
47. Wolfe MD, Kulakow P, Rabbi IY, Jannink JL. Marker-based estimates reveal significant non-Additive effects in clonally propagated cassava (Manihot esculenta): implications for the prediction of total genetic value and the selection of varieties. G3 (Bethesda). 2016;3:3497-506.
48. VanRaden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414-23.
49. Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee D. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In: Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, 19-23 August 2002, Montpellier. CD-ROM Communication 28:07; 2002.
50. Piepho HP, Pillen K. Mixed modelling for QTL × environment interaction analysis. Euphytica. 2004;137:147-53.
51. VanRaden PM, Tooker ME, Wright JR, Sun C, Hutchison JL. Comparison of single-Trait to multi-Trait national evaluations for yield, health, and fertility. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:7952-62.
52. Calus MP, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of multi-Trait genomic selection using different methods. Genet Sel Evol. 2011;43:26.
53. Guo G, Zhao F, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du L, Su G. Comparison of single-Trait and multiple-Trait genomic prediction models. BMC Genet. 2014;15:30.
54. Oakey H, Cullis B, Thompson R, Comadran J, Halpin C, Waugh R. Genomic selection in multi-environment crop trials. G3 (Bethesda). 2016;6:1313-26.
55. Cuevas J, Crossa J, Soberanis V, Pérez-Elizalde S, Pérez-Rodríguez P, de los Campos G, et al. Genomic prediction of genotype × environment interaction kernel regression models. Plant Genome. 2016;9:3.
56. Cuevas J, Crossa J, Montesinos-López OA, Burgueño J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, de los Campos G. Bayesian genomic prediction with genotype × environment interaction kernel models. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7:41-53.
57. Jennings DL. Breeding for resistance to African cassava mosaic disease: progress and prospects. In: Nestel, editor. African cassava mosaic. Report of an interdisciplinary workshop, 19-22 February 1976, Muguga; 1976.
58. Wolfe MD, Rabbi IY, Egesi C, Hamblin M, Kawuki R, Kulakow P, et al. Genome-wide association and prediction reveals genetic architecture of Cassava mosaic disease resistance and prospects for rapid genetic improvement. Plant Genome. 2016;9:2.
59. Schaeffer LR. Sire and cow evaluation under multiple trait models. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1567-80.