Methodologies for the examination of water in GPCRs

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1705, Issue , 2018, Pages 207-232

  Bortolato, Andrea ^a   Tehan, Benjamin G ^a   Smith, Robert T ^a   Mason, Jonathan S ^a  

^a Heptares Therapeutics Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Molecular dynamics; Water; Water energetics; Water perturbation; WaterFLAP; WaterMap

Indexed keywords

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; WATER; PROTEIN BINDING;

DRUG DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SOFTWARE;

ALGORITHMS; DRUG DISCOVERY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; SOFTWARE; WATER;

EID: 85036633172     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7465-8_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Ball P (2008) Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem Rev 108(1):74–108. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068037a.
2. Chaplin M (2006) Do we underestimate the importance of water in cell biology? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(11):861–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2021.
3. Ball P (2008) Water as a biomolecule. Chem-PhysChem 9(18):2677–2685. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800515.
4. Mason JS, Bortolato A, Congreve M et al (2012) New insights from structural biology into the druggability of G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 33 (5):249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Tips.2012.02.005.
5. Mason JS, Bortolato A, Weiss DR et al (2013) High end GPCR design: crafted ligand design and druggability analysis using protein structure, lipophilic hotspots and explicit water networks. Silico Pharmacol 1(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9616-1-23.
6. Cooke RM, Brown AJH, Marshall FH et al (2015) Structures of G protein-coupled receptors reveal new opportunities for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 20(11): 1355–1364.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Drudis.2015.08.003.
7. Bortolato A, Tehan BG, Bodnarchuk MS et al (2013) Water network perturbation in ligand binding: adenosine A2A antagonists as a case study. J Chem Inf Model 53:1700–1713. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci4001458.
8. Bortolato A, Deflorian F, Weiss DR, Mason JS (2015) Decoding the role of water dynamics in ligand-protein unbinding: CRF1R as a test case. J Chem Inf Model 55(9):1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.Jcim.5b00440.
9. FLAP 2.2, Molecular Discovery Ltd. https://www.moldiscovery.com/.
10. Goodford PJ (1985) A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 28(7):849–857.
11. Schrödinger release 2016-4:WaterMap. Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2016.
12. Abel R, Young T, Farid R et al (2008) Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding. J Am Chem Soc 130(9):2817–2831. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0771033.
13. Young T, Abel R, Kim B et al (2007) Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein–ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:808–813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610202104.
14. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7.4.0, Open-Source.
15. Berendsen HJ, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91(1–3):43–56.
16. Sousa da Silva AW, Vranken WF (2012) ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon parser interfacE. BMC Res Notes 5(1):367.
17. Lazaridis T (1998) Inhomogeneous fluid approach to solvation thermodynamics. 1. Theory. J Phys Chem B 102:3531–3541.