Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 48, 2017, Pages 12702-12707

  Romano, Angelo ^a,b   Balliet, Daniel ^a   Yamagishi, Toshio ^c   Liu, James H ^d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c HITOTSUBASHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Culture; Parochial altruism; Reputation; Trust

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERGROUP BIAS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TRUST; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; GROUP PROCESS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TRUST;

EID: 85035789958     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712921114     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bernhard H, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442: 912-915.
2. Choi JK, Bowles S (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318: 636-640.
3. Halevy N, Bornstein G, Sagiv L (2008) “In-group love” and “out-group hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychol Sci 19:405-411.
4. Yamagishi T, Jin N, Kiyonari T (1999) Bounded generalized reciprocity. Adv Group Process 16:161-197.
5. de Dreu CK (2010) Social value orientation moderates ingroup love but not outgroup hate in competitive intergroup conflict. Group Process Interg 13:701-713.
6. Hruschka DJ, Henrich J (2013a) Institutions, parasites and the persistence of in-group preferences. PLoS One 8:e63642.
7. Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CK (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140:1556-1581.
8. Yamagishi T, Mifune N (2008) Does shared group membership promote altruism? Fear, greed, and reputation. Ration Soc 20:5-30.
9. Murphy RO, Ackermann KA, Handgraaf M (2011) Measuring social value orientation. Judgm Decis Mak 6:771-781.
10. Dreu CK, Dussel DB, Velden FST (2015) In intergroup conflict, self-sacrifice is stronger among pro-social individuals, and parochial altruism emerges especially among cognitively taxed individuals. Front Psychol 6:572.
11. Fischbacher U, Gächter S, Fehr E (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ Lett 71:397-404.
12. Hill KR, et al. (2011) Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science 331:1286-1289.
13. Bowles S (2009) Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science 324:1293-1298.
14. Van Vugt M, De Cremer D, Janssen DP (2007) Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychol Sci 18:19-23.
15. Fincher CL, Thornhill R (2012) Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behav Brain Sci 35:61-79.
16. Hruschka DJ, Henrich J (2013) Economic and evolutionary hypotheses for cross-population variation in parochialism. Front Hum Neurosci 7:559.
17. Van de Vliert E (2011) Climato-economic origins of variation in ingroup favoritism. J Cross Cult Psychol 42:494-515.
18. Johnson S, McMillan J, Woodruff C (2002) Courts and relational contracts. J Law Econ Organ 18:221-277.
19. Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY (1994) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
20. Henrich J, et al. (2010) Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327:1480-1484.
21. McNamara RA, Norenzayan A, Henrich J (2016) Supernatural punishment, in-group biases, and material insecurity: Experiments and ethnography from Yasawa, Fiji. Religion Brain Behav 6:34-55.
22. Weeden J, Kurzban R (2013) What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evol Hum Behav 34:440-445.
23. Johnson DD (2005) God’s punishment and public goods: A test of the supernatural punishment hypothesis in 186 world cultures. Hum Nat 16:410-446.
24. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ Behav 10:122-142.
25. Yamagishi T, et al. (2013) Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 120: 260-271.
26. Balliet D, Van Lange PAM (2013) Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 139:1090-1112.
27. Romano A, Balliet D, Wu J (2017) Unbounded indirect reciprocity: Is reputation-based cooperation bounded by group membership? J Exp Soc Psychol 71:59-67.
28. Dorrough AR, Glöckner A (2016) Multinational investigation of cross-societal cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:10836-10841.
29. Jin N, Yamagishi T (1997) Group heuristics in social dilemma. Jpn J Soc Psychol 12: 190-198.
30. Witt MG, Wood W (2010) Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles 62:635-646.
31. Balliet D, Li NP, Macfarlan SJ, Van Vugt M (2011) Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychol Bull 137:881-909.
32. Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079-1083.
33. Thielmann I, Böhm R (2016) Who does (not) participate in intergroup conflict? Soc Psychol Personal Sci 7:778-787.
34. Yamagishi T, et al. (2015) Two-component model of general trust: Predicting behavioral trust from attitudinal trust. Soc Cogn 33:436-458.
35. Gil de Zúñiga H, Liu JH (2017) Second screening politics in the social media sphere: Advancing research on dual screen use in political communication with evidence from 20 countries. J Broadcast Electron Media 61:193-219.
36. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261-304.
37. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package, Version 1.0-5. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed September 1, 2017.
38. Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1-4.
39. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw 59:1-38.