The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 157, Issue , 2018, Pages 15-26

  Damgaard, Mette Trier ^a   Gravert, Christina ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Avoiding the ask; Charitable giving; Field experiment; Inattention; Nudge; Reminders

Indexed keywords

EID: 85035120307     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allcott, H., Kessler, J.B., The welfare effects of nudges: a case study of energy use social comparisons. Working Paper 21671, 2015, National Bureau of Economic Research October.
2. Allcott, H., Rogers, T., The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:10 (2014), 3003–3037.
3. Altmann, S., Traxler, C., Nudges at the dentist. Eur. Econ. Rev. 72:0 (2014), 19–38.
4. Andreoni, J., Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Polit. Econ. 97:6 (1989), 1447–1458.
5. Andreoni, J., Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 199:401 (1990), 464–477.
6. Andreoni, J., Rao, J.M., Trachtman, H., Avoiding the ask: a field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving., 125(3), 2017, 625–653.
7. Bernheim, B.D., Fradkin, A., Popov, I., The welfare economics of default options in 401(k) plans. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:9 (2015), 2798–2837.
8. Bhargava, S., Manoli, D., Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: evidence from an IRS field experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:11 (2015), 3489–3529.
9. Bhattacharya, J., Garber, A.M., Goldhaber-Fiebert, J.D., Nudges in exercise commitment contracts: a randomized trial. NBER Working Paper No. 21406, 2015.
10. Cain, D.M., Dana, J., Newman, G.E., Giving versus giving in. Acad. Manag. Ann. 8:1 (2014), 505–533.
11. Calzolari, G., Nardotto, M., Effective Reminders. Manag. Sci. 63 (2017), 2915–2932.
12. Carroll, G.D., Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C., Metrick, A., Optimal defaults and active decisions. Q. J. Econ. 124:4 (2009), 1639–1674.
13. Chesterley, N., Nudges and welfare: optimal behavioural policy with decision costs. SSRN Working Paper, 2015.
14. Damgaard, M.T., Gravert, C., Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving. Aarhus University Economics Working Paper 2014-03, 2014.
15. Damgaard, M.T., Gravert, C., Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving: evidence from two natural field experiments. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 66 (2017), 78–87.
16. Dana, J., Weber, R.A., Kuang, J.X., Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econ. Theory 33:1 (2007), 67–80.
17. Aid, DanChurch, Aarsrapport Folkekirkens Nødhjælp 2013. 2013.
18. Statistik, Danmarks, Befolkningens Løn. 2013.
19. DellaVigna, S., List, J.A., Malmendier, U., Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Q. J. Econ. 127:1 (2012), 1–56.
20. Ericson, K.M.M., Forgetting we forget: overconfidence and memory. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 9:1 (2011), 43–60.
21. Gilbert, B., Zivin, J.G., Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: evidence from smart electricity meters. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 107, Part A:0 (2014), 176–190.
22. Gönül, F., Hofstede, F.T., How to compute optimal catalog mailing decisions. Mark. Sci. 25:1 (2006), 65–74.
23. Gönül, F., Shi, M.Z., Optimal mailing of ccatalog: a new methodology using estimable structural dynamic programming models. Manag. Sci. 44:9 (1998, September), 1249–1262 September.
24. Handel, B.R., Adverse selection and inertia in health insurance markets: when nudging hurts. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:7 (2013), 2643–2682.
25. Huck, S., Rasul, I., Transaction costs in charitable giving. B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy, 10(1), 2010, 31.
26. ISOBRO, Deloitte. Isobro Og Deloitte's Analyse Af Udviklingen I De Danske Indsamlingsorganisationers Indtgter mv. I Perioden 2009–2013. 2014.
27. Karlan, D., McConnell, M., Mullainathan, S., Zinman, J., Getting to the top of mind: how reminders increase saving. Manag. Sci. 62:12 (2016), 3393–3411.
28. Knutsson, M., Martinsson, P., Wollbrant, C., Do people avoid opportunities to donate?: a natural field experiment on recycling and charitable giving. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 93 (2013), 71–77.
29. Letzler, R., Tasoff, J., Everyone believes in redemption: nudges and overoptimism in costly task completion. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 107 (2014), 107–122.
30. List, J.A., Shaikh, A.M., Xu, Y., Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Working Paper 21875, 2016, National Bureau of Economic Research January.
31. McFadden, D., A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica 57:5 (1989), 995–1026.
32. Murooka, T., Schwarz, M.A., 2016. The timing of choice-enhancing policies. Unpublished manuscript.
33. Simester, D.I., Sun, P., Tsitsiklis, J.N., Dynamic catalog mailing policies. Manag. Sci. 52:5 (2006), 683–696 May.
34. Singer, P., The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty. 2009, Random House.
35. Sonntag, A., Zizzo, D.J., On reminder effects, drop-outs and dominance: evidence from an online experiment on charitable giving. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 2015, e0134705 08.
36. Taubinsky, D., From intentions to actions: a model and experimental evidence of inattentive choice. Working Paper, 2013.
37. Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R., Libertarian peternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:2 (2003), 175–179 Pappers and Proceedings.
38. Trachtman, H., Steinkruger, A., Wood, M., Wooster, A., Andreoni, J., Murphy, J., Rao, J., Fair weather avoidance: unpacking the costs and benefits of avoiding the ask?. J. Econ. Sci. Assoc. 1:1 (2015), 8–14.
39. Vervloet, M., Linn, A.J., van Weert, J.C.M., de Bakker, D.H., Bouvy, M.L., van Dijk, L., The effectiveness of interventions using electronic reminders to improve adherence to chronic medication: a systematic review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 19 (2012), 696–704.