Network Mapping with GIMME

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 789-804

  Beltz, Adriene M ^a   Gates, Kathleen M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Connectivity; idiographic vs. nomothetic methods; intensive longitudinal data; time series analysis; unified structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HUMAN; PIPELINE; PREDICTION; SCIENTIST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85034762565     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1373014     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bajardi, P., Poletto, C., Ramasco, J. J., Tizzoni, M., Colizza, V., & Vespignani, A., (2011). Human mobility networks, travel restrictions, and the global spread of 2009 H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One, 6(1), article e16591. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016591
2. Beltz, A. M., Beekman, C., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Buss, K. A., (2013). Mapping temporal dynamics in social interactions with unified structural equation modeling: A description and demonstration revealing time-dependent sex differences in play behavior. Applied Developmental Science, 17(3), 152–168. doi:10.1080/10888691.2013.805953
3. Beltz, A. M., Gates, K. M., Engels, A. S., Molenaar, P. C. M., Pulido, C., Turrisi, R., … Wilson, S. J., (2013). Changes in alcohol-related brain networks across the first year of college: A prospective pilot study using fMRI effective connectivity mapping. Addictive Behaviors, 38(4), 2052–2059. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.023
4. Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2015). A posteriori model validation for the temporal order of directed functional connectivity maps. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, article 304. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00304
5. Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2016). Dealing with multiple solutions in structural vector autoregressive models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 357–373. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1151333
6. Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23(4), 447–458. doi:10.1177/1073191116648209
7. Biswal, B. B., Mennes, M., Zuo, X. N., Gohel, S., Kelly, C., Smith, S. M., … Milham, M. P., (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(10), 4734–4739. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107
8. Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S., (2009). Gender development. New York, NY: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
9. Bollen, K. A., (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
10. Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J., (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
11. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M., (1970). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
12. Bringmann, L. F., Pe, M. L., Vissers, N., Ceulemans, E., Borsboom, D., Vanpaemel, W., … Kuppens, P., (2016). Assessing temporal emotion dynamics using networks. Assessment, 23(4), 425–435. doi:10.1177/1073191116645909
13. Brown, T. A., (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14. Bulteel, K., Tuerlinckx, F., Brose, A., & Ceulemans, E., (2016). Clustering vector autoregressive models: Capturing qualitative differences in within-person dynamics. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, article 1540. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01540
15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R., (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO–FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16. Epskamp, S., Rhemtulla, M., & Borsboom, D., (2017). Generalized network psychometrics: Combining network and latent variable models. Psychometrika. doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9557-x
17. Finn, E. S., Shen, X. L., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., … Constable, R. T., (2015). Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 18(11), 1664–1671. doi:10.1038/nn.4135
18. Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W., (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1273–1302. doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7
19. Friston, K. J., Josephs, O., Zarahn, E., Holmes, A. P., Rouquette, S., & Poline, J. B., (2000). To smooth or not to smooth? Bias and efficiency in fMRI time-series analysis. Neuroimage, 12(2), 196–208. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0609
20. Friston, K. J., Moran, R., & Seth, A. K., (2013). Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 172–178. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010
21. Gates, K. M., Lane, S. T., Varangis, E., Giovanello, K., & Guiskewicz, K., (2017). Unsupervised classification during time-series model building. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(2), 128–148. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1256187
22. Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. Neuroimage, 63(1), 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026
23. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J., (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. Neuroimage, 50(3), 1118–1125. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117
24. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F. G., & Slobounov, S., (2011). Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. Neuroimage, 54(2), 1151–1158. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.051
25. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Iyer, S. P., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A., (2014). Organizing heterogeneous samples using community detection of GIMME-derived resting state functional networks. PLoS One, 9(3), article e91322. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091322
26. Granger, C. W. J., (1969). Investigating causal relations by economic models and cross-spectral methods Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. doi:10.2307/1912791
27. Grant, A. M., Fang, S., & Li, P., (2015). Second language lexical development and cognitive control: A longitudinal fMRI study. Brain & Language, 144, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.010
28. Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V., & Molenaar, P. C., (2005). Statistical modeling of the individual: Rationale and application of multivariate stationary time series analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(2), 207–233. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_3
29. Henry, T., & Gates, K., (2017). Causal search procedures for fMRI: Review and suggestions. Behaviormetrika, 44(1), 193–225. doi: 10.1007/s41237-016-0010-8
30. Hillary, F. G., Medaglia, J. D., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C., & Good, D. C., (2014). Examining network dynamics after traumatic brain injury using the extended unified SEM approach. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 8(3), 435–445. doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9205-0
31. Hillary, F. G., Medaglia, J. D., Gates, K., Molenaar, P. C., Slocomb, J., Peechatka, A., & Good, D. C., (2011). Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network. Brain, 134, 1555–1570. doi:10.1093/brain/awr043
32. Honaker, J., & King, G., (2010). What to do about missing values in time-series cross-section data. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 561–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
33. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D., (1992). LISREL. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
34. Karunanayaka, P., Eslinger, P. J., Wang, J. L., Weitekamp, C. W., Molitoris, S., Gates, K. M., … Yang, Q. X., (2014). Networks involved in olfaction and their dynamics using independent component analysis and unified structural equation modeling. Human Brain Mapping, 35(5), 2055–2072. doi:10.1002/hbm.22312
35. Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P. M., & Ernst, T., (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28(2), 85–93. doi:10.1002/hbm.20259
36. Lane, S. T., & Gates, K. M., (2017). Automated selection of robust individual-level structural equation models for time series data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(5), 768–782. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1309978
37. Lane, S., Gates, K., & Molenaar, P., (2017). gimme: Group iterative multiple model estimation [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package = gimme (R package version 0.2-2)
38. Liu, S. W., & Molenaar, P. C. M., (2014). iVAR: A program for imputing missing data in multivariate time series using vector autoregressive models. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1138–1148. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0444-4
39. Loehlin, J. C., (1996). The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note. Behavior Genetics, 26(1), 65–69. doi:10.1007/BF02361160
40. Lütkepohl, H., (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
41. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B., (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.111.3.490
42. MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R., (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 185–199. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185
43. Markus, K. A., (2002). Statistical equivalence, semantic equivalence, eliminative induction, and the Raykov-Marcoulides proof of infinite equivalence. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 503–522. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0904_3
44. Mathworks. (2015). Matlab. Natick, MA: The Mathworks,Inc.
45. Molenaar, P. C., (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychomerika, 50(2), 181–202. doi:10.1007/BF02294246
46. Molenaar, P. C. M., (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
47. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G., (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
48. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Lo, L. L., (2016). Alternative forms of Granger causality, heterogeneity and non-stationarity. In A., von Eye & W., Wiedermann (eds.), Statistics and causality (pp. 205–230). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
49. Nichols, T. T., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Wilson, S. J., (2014). Greater BOLD activity but more efficient connectivity is associated with better cognitive performance within a sample of nicotine-deprived smokers. Addiction Biology, 19(5), 931–940. doi:10.1111/adb.12060
50. Price, R. B., Lane, S., Gates, K. M., Kraynak, T. E., Horner, M. S., Thase, M. E., & Siegle, G. J., (2017). Parsing heterogeneity in the brain connectivity of depressed and healthy adults during positive mood. Biological Psychiatry, 81(4), 347–357. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023
51. R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Project for Statistical Computing.
52. Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J., & Glymour, C., (2011). Multi-subject search correctly identifies causal connections and most causal directions in the DCM models of the Smith et al. simulation study. Neuroimage, 58(3), 838–848. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.068
53. Rankin, E. D., & Marsh, J. C., (1985). Effects of missing data on the statistical analysis of clinical time series. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 21(2), 13–16. doi:dOi.org/10.1093/swra/21.2.13
54. Rose, A. J., (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73(6), 1830–1843. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00509
55. Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O., (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52(3), 1059–1069. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
56. Smith, S. M., (2012). The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage, 62(2), 1257–1266. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.022
57. Smith, S. M., Miller, K. L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Webster, M., Beckmann, C. F., Nichols, T. E., … Woolrich, M. W., (2011). Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage, 54(2), 875–891. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063
58. Sörbom, D., (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54(3), 371–384. doi:10.1007/bf02294623
59. Sporns, O., (2011). Networks of the brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
60. Van Dijk, K. R. A., Hedden, T., Venkataraman, A., Evans, K. C., Lazar, S. W., & Buckner, R. L., (2010). Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: Theory, properties, and optimization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103(1), 297–321. doi:10.1152/jn.00783.2009
61. Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M., (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1370–1386. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0931
62. Yang, J., Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P., & Li, P., (2015). Neural changes underlying successful second language word learning: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 33, 29–49. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.09.004
63. Zelle, S. L., Gates, K. M., Fiez, J. A., Sayette, M. A., & Wilson, S. J., (2016). The first day is always the hardest: Functional connectivity during cue exposure and the ability to resist smoking in the initial hours of a quit attempt. Neuroimage, 151, 24–32. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.015
64. Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E. L., & Nesselroade, J. R., (2008). Comparisons of four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 377–402. doi:10.1080/10705510802154281