Automated Selection of Robust Individual-Level Structural Equation Models for Time Series Data

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 768-782

  Lane, Stephanie T ^a   Gates, Kathleen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

R; structural equation modeling; time series

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATLAB; SPECIFICATIONS;

AUTOMATED SELECTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INDIVIDUAL LEVELS; LONGITUDINAL DATA; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; TIME-SERIES DATA;

TIME SERIES;

EID: 85018316296     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: 15328007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1309978     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anzman-Frasca, S., Liu, S., Gates, K. M., Paul, I. M., Rovine, M. J., & Birch, L. L., (2013). Infants’ transitions out of a fussing/crying state are modifiable and are related to weight status. Infancy, 18, 662–686.
2. Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Harms, M. P., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., Corbetta, M.,… Washington university in St. Louis–university of Minnesota Human Connectome Project Consortium. (2013). Function in the human connectome:Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. NeuroImage, 80, 169–189.
3. Beltz, A. M., Gates, K. M., Engels, A. S., Molenaar, P. C., Pulido, C., Turrisi, R.,… Wilson, S. J., (2013). Changes in alcohol-related brain networks across the first year of college:A prospective pilot study using fMRI effective connectivity mapping. Addictive Behaviors, 38, 2052–2059.
4. Bentler, P. M., (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
5. Bentler, P. M., (1995). EQS structural equations program manual [Computer software manual]. Encino, CA:Multivariate Software.
6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G., (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
7. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F., (1998). The Big Five as states:How useful is the Five-Factor Model to describe intraindividual variations over time? Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 202–221.
8. Brown, T., (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY:Guilford.
9. Chen, G., Glen, D. R., Saad, Z. S., Hamilton, J. P., Thompson, M. E., Gotlib, I. H., & Cox, R. W., (2011). Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 41, 1142–1115.
10. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D., (2012). qgraph:Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i04/
11. Fair, D. A., Bathula, D., Nikolas, M. A., & Nigg, J. T., (2012). Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD. PNAS:Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, 109, 6769–6774.
12. Gates, K. M., Lane, S. T., Varangis, E., Giovanello, K., & Guskiewicz, K., (2017). Unsupervised classification during time series model selection. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 129–148.
13. Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C., (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310–319.
14. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J., (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping:An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, var, and unified SEM. NeuroImage, 50, 1118–1125.
15. Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C., Iyer, S. P., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A., (2014). Organizing heterogeneous samples using community detection of gimme-derived resting state functional networks. PLOS One, 9(3), 1–11.
16. Granger, C. W. J., (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424–438.
17. Hamaker, E., Dolan, C., & Molenaar, P., (2002). On the nature of SEM estimates of ARMA parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 347–368.
18. Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G., (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (Vol. 1). Sunderland, MA:Sinauer Associates Sunderland.
19. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D., (2006). LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software manual]. Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
20. Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P., & Ernst, T., (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 85–93.
21. Lamiell, J. T., (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36, 276–289.
22. Lane, S., Gates, K., & Molenaar, P., (2014). gimme:Group iterative multiple model estimation [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gimme (R package version 0.1-7)
23. Lane, S. T., Gates, K., Pike, H., Beltz, A., & Wright, A., (2016). Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data.
24. MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B., (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis:The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504.
25. Molenaar, P. C., (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science:Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.
26. Molenaar, P. C., (2008). On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems:Analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation. Developmental Psychobiology, 50, 60–69.
27. Mumford, J., & Ramsey, J., (2014). Bayesian networks for fMRI:A primer. NeuroImage, 86, 573–582.
28. Múthen, L., & Múthen, B., (2012). Mplus user’s guide, (7th ed). [Computer software manual]. Los Angeles, CA:Múthen & Múthen.
29. Pons, P., & Latapy, M., (2006). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 10, 191–218.
30. Rosseel, Y., (2012). lavaan:An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
31. Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J. M., Hofer, S. M., & Stawski, R. S., (2006). Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition. Psychological Aging, 21, 545–557.
32. Steiger, J. H., (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification:An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
33. The MathWorks., (2010). Matlab–The language of technical computing, (Version 7.10.0) [Computer software manual]. Natick, MA:Author. Retrieved from http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab
34. van den Heuvel, M. P., & Sporns, O., (2011). Rich-club organization of the human connectome. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 15775–15786.
35. van den Heuvel, M. P., Stam, C. J., Kahn, R. S., & Pol, H. E. H., (2009). Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7619–7624.
36. Van Essen, D. C., Smith, S. M., Barch, D. M., Behrens, T. E., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K.,. The Washington University in St. Louis–University of Minnesota Human Connectome Project Consortium. (2013). The Wu-Minn Human Connectome Project:An overview. NeuroImage, 80, 62–79.