PocketPlant3D: Analysing canopy structure using a smartphone

Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 164, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-12

  Confalonieri, Roberto ^a   Paleari, Livia ^a   Foi, Marco ^a   Movedi, Ermes ^a   Vesely, Fosco M ^a   Thoelke, William ^a   Agape, Cristina ^a   Borlini, Giulia ^a   Ferri, Irene ^a   Massara, Federico ^a   Motta, Roberto ^a   Ravasi, Riccardo A ^a   Tartarini, Sofia ^a   Zoppolato, Camilla ^a   Baia, Luca M ^a   Brumana, Andrea ^a   Colombo, Davide ^a   Curatolo, Antonio ^a   Fauda, Valerio ^a   Gaia, Denise ^a   Gerosa, Andrea ^a   Ghilardi, Antonio ^a   Grassi, Enrico ^a   Magarini, Andrea ^a   Novelli, Francesco ^a   Perez Garcia, Fatima B ^a   Rota Graziosi, Andrea ^a   Salvan, Michele ^a   Tadiello, Tommaso ^a   Rossini, Laura ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Leaf angle distribution; Leaf curvature; Leaf insertion angle; Maize (Zea mays); Phenotyping

Indexed keywords

GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT);

INSERTION ANGLES; LEAF ANGLE DISTRIBUTIONS; LEAF CURVATURE; PHENOTYPING; ZEA MAYS;

SMARTPHONES;

EID: 85032855617     PISSN: 15375110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ballaré, C.L., Scopel, A.L., Sánchez, R.A., On the opportunity cost of the photosynthate invested in stem elongation reactions mediated by phytochrome. Oecologia 86 (1991), 561–567.
2. Biskup, B., Scharr, H., Schurr, U., Rascher, U., A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant, Cell & Environment 30 (2007), 1299–1308.
3. Bruskiewich, R., Coe, E.H., Jaiswal, P., McCouch, S., Polacco, M., Stein, L., et al. The plant ontology™ consortium and plant ontologies. Comparative and Functional Genomics 3 (2002), 137–142.
4. Campbell, G.S., Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 36 (1986), 317–321.
5. Campbell, G.S., Derivation of an angle density function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 49 (1990), 173–176.
6. Campbell, G.S., Norman, J.M., An introduction to environmental biophysics. 2nd ed., 1998, Springer-Verlag, New York, 286.
7. Chen, Z.-L., Zhang, H.-M., Effect of transplanting shock on maize root growth. Edmeades, G.O., Bänziger, M., Mickelson, H.R., Peña-Valdivia, C.B., (eds.) Developing drought- and low N-tolerant maize. Proceeding of a Symposium, CYMMIT, 1997, El Batán, Mexico, 177–178.
8. Clemons, T.E., Bradley, E.L. Jr., A nonparametric measure of the overlapping coefficient. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 34 (2000), 51–61.
9. Cochran, W.G., The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total. Annals of Human Genetics 11 (1941), 47–52.
10. Confalonieri, R., Foi, M., Casa, R., Aquaro, S., Tona, E., Peterle, M., et al. Development of an app for estimating leaf area index using a smartphone. Trueness and precision determination and comparison with other indirect methods. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 96 (2013), 67–74.
11. Confalonieri, R., Francone, C., Chiodini, M.E., Cantaluppi, E., Caravati, L., Colombi, V., et al. Any chance to evaluate in vivo field methods using standard protocols?. Field Crops Research 161 (2014), 128–136.
12. Confalonieri, R., Paleari, L., Movedi, E., Pagani, V., Orlando, F., Foi, M., et al. Improving in vivo plant nitrogen content estimates from digital images: Trueness and precision of a new approach as compared to other methods and commercial devices. Biosystems Engineering 135 (2015), 21–30.
13. Confalonieri, R., Stroppiana, D., Boschetti, M., Gusberti, D., Bocchi, S., Acutis, M., Analysis of rice sample size variability due to development stage, nitrogen fertilization, sowing technique and variety using the visual jackknife. Field Crops Research 97 (2006), 135–141.
14. Deckmyn, G., Nijs, I., Ceulemans, R., A simple method to determine leaf angles of grass species. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 (2000), 1467–1470.
15. Dong, H., Zhao, H., Xie, W., Han, Z., Li, G., Yao, W., et al. A novel tiller angle gene, TAC3, together with TAC1 and D2 largely determine the natural variation of tiller angle in rice cultivars. PLoS Genetics, 12, 2016, e1006412.
16. Drewry, D.T., Kumar, P., Long, S.P., Simultaneous improvement in crop productivity, water use, and albedo through crop structural modification. Global Change Biology 20 (2014), 1955–1967.
17. Duan, T., Chapman, S.C., Holland, E., Rebetzke, G.J., Guo, Y., Zheng, B., Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany 67 (2016), 4523–4534.
18. Duvick, D.N., Cassman, K.G., Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Science 39 (1999), 1622–1630.
19. Escribano-Rocafort, A.G., Ventre-Lespiaucq, A.B., Granado-Yela, C., López-Pintor, A., Delgado, J.A., Muñoz, V., et al. Simplifying data acquisition in plant canopies – measurements of leaf angles with a cell phone. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5 (2014), 132–140.
20. Evers, J.B., Vos, J., Andrieu, B., Struik, P.C., Cessation of tillering in spring wheat in relation to light interception and red: Far-red ratio. Annals of Botany 97 (2006), 649–658.
21. Fellner, M., Ford, E.D., Van Volkenburgh, E., Development of erect leaves in a modern maize hybrid is associated with reduced responsiveness to auxin and light of young seedlings in vitro. Plant Signaling & Behavior 1 (2006), 201–211.
22. Fellner, M., Horton, L.A., Cocke, A.E., Stephens, N.R., Ford, E.D., Van Volkenburgh, E., Light interacts with auxin during leaf elongation and leaf angle development in young corn seedlings. Planta 216 (2003), 366–376.
23. Fiorani, F., Schurr, U., Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64 (2013), 267–291.
24. Gan, S., Amasino, R.M., Making sense of senescence. Plant Physiology 113 (1997), 313–319.
25. Goel, N.S., Strebel, D.E., Simple beta distribution representation of leaf orientation in vegetation canopies. Agronomy Journal 76 (1984), 800–802.
26. Grubbs, F.E., Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 11 (1969), 1–21.
27. Hernández, L.F., Leaf inclination and light interception in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Importance of petiole's mechanical and structural properties. Proceedings of the 6th Plant Biomechanics Conference, Cayenne, French Guyana, France, 16–21 November, 2009.
28. Horwitz, W., Protocol of the design. Conduct and interpretation of method performance studies. Pure and Applied Chemistry 67 (1995), 331–343.
29. Hosoi, F., Nakai, Y., Omasa, K., Estimating the leaf inclination angle distribution of the wheat canopy using a portable scanning lidar. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 65 (2009), 297–302.
30. IRRI, Standard evaluation systems for rice. 2002, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Manila, Philippines, 19.
31. ISO, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements methods and results – Part 2: Basic method for the determination of reproducibility of a standard measurement method, ISO 5725-2. 1994, 42.
32. Kirikovich, S.S., Levites, E.V., Effect of epimutagen Triton X-100 on morphological traits in sugarbeet. Sugar Technology 11 (2009), 307–310.
33. Lancashire, P.D., Bleiholder, H., Langeluddecke, P., Stauss, R., van den Boom, T., Weber, E., et al. An uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Annals of Applied Biology 119 (1991), 561–601.
34. Li, C., Li, Y., Shi, Y., Song, Y., Zhang, D., Buckler, E.S., et al. Genetic control of the leaf angle and leaf orientation value as revealed by ultra-high density maps in three connected maize populations. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0121624.
35. Luo, X., Zheng, J., Huang, R., Huang, Y., Wang, H., Jiang, L., et al. Phytohormones signaling and crosstalk regulating leaf angle in rice. Plant Cell Reports 35 (2016), 2423–2433.
36. Ma, D.L., Xie, R.Z., Niu, X.K., Li, S.K., Long, H.L., Liu, Y.E., Changes in the morphological traits of maize genotypes in China between the 1950s and 2000s. European Journal of Agronomy 58 (2014), 1–10.
37. Maddonni, G.A., Otegui, M.E., Cirilo, A.G., Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Research 71 (2001), 183–193.
38. Müller-Linow, M., Pinto-Espinosa, F., Scharr, H., Rascher, U., The leaf angle distribution of natural plant populations: Assessing the canopy with a novel software tool. Plant Methods, 11, 2015, 11.
39. Ort, D.R., Merchang, S.S., Alric, J., Barkan, A., Blankenship, R.E., Bock, R., et al. Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 112 (2015), 8529–8536.
40. Pisek, J., Ryu, Y., Alikas, K., Estimating leaf inclination and G-function from leveled digital camera photography in broadleaf canopies. Trees 25 (2011), 919–924.
41. Raabe, K., Pisek, J., Sonnentag, O., Annuk, K., Variations of leaf inclination angle distribution with height over the growing season and light exposure for eight broadleaf tree species. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2015 214–215, 2–11.
42. Rakocevic, M., Sinoquet, H., Christophe, A., Varlet-Grancher, C., Assessing the geometric structure of a white clover (Trifolium repens L.) canopy using 3-D digitising. Annals of Botany 86 (2000), 519–526.
43. Reynolds, M.P., Rajaram, S., Sayre, K.D., Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post–green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Science 39 (1999), 1611–1621.
44. Ross, J., The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. 1981, Junk Publishers, The Hague.
45. Ross, J., Nilson, T., The extinction of direct radiation in crops. Questions on radiation regime of plant stands. Acad. Sci. ESSR, Inst. Phys. Astron. Tartu, 1965, 25–64.
46. Rowden, R., Gardiner, D., Whiteman, P.C., Wallis, E.S., Effects of planting density on growth, light interception and yield of a photoperiod insensitive pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Field Crops Research 4 (1981), 201–213.
47. Scaglia, B., Acutis, M., Adani, F., Precision determination for the dynamic respirometric index (DRI) method used for biological stability evaluation on municipal solid waste and derived products. Waste Management 31 (2011), 2–9.
48. Shi, Y., Wang, X., Guo, S., Ren, Z., Ku, L., Zhu, Y., et al. Plant Breeding 136 (2016), 33–40.
49. Sinoquet, H., Rivet, P., Measurement and visualisation of the architecture of an adult tree based on a three-dimensional digitising device. Trees 11 (1997), 265–270.
50. Tadrist, L., de Langre, E., Saudreau, M., How petiole flexibility changes light interception at the tree scale. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Functional-Structural Plant Models, Saariselkä, Finland, 9–14 June, 2013.
51. Torres, G., Vossenkemper, J., Raun, W., Taylor, R., Maize (Zea mays) leaf angle and emergence as affected by seed orientation at planting. Experimental Agriculture 47 (2011), 579–592.
52. Truong, S.K., McCormick, R.F., Rooney, W.L., Mullet, J.E., Harnessing genetic variation in leaf angle to increase productivity of Sorghum bicolor. Genetics 201 (2015), 1229–1238.
53. Wang, W.M., Li, Z.L., Su, H.B., Comparison of leaf angle distribution functions: Effects on extinction coefficient and fraction of sunlit foliage. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 143 (2007), 106–122.
54. Warrington, I.J., Rook, D.A., Morgan, D.C., Turnbull, H.L., The influence of simulated shadelight and daylight on growth, development and photosynthesis of Pinus radiata, Agathis australis and Dacrydium cupressinum. Plant, Cell & Environment 12 (1989), 343–356.
55. Wright, I.J., Leishman, M.R., Read, C., Westoby, M., Gradients of light availability and leaf traits with leaf age and canopy position in 28 Australian shrubs and trees. Functional Plant Biology 33 (2006), 407–419.
56. Wu, Q., Chen, Y., Fu, L., Zhou, S., Chen, J., Zhao, X., et al. QTL mapping of flag leaf traits in common wheat using an integrated high-density SSR and SNP genetic linkage map. Euphytica 208 (2016), 337–351.
57. Ye, X., Lu, Y., Liu, W., Chen, G., Han, H., Zhang, J., et al. The effects of chromosome 6P on fertile tiller number of wheat as revealed in wheat-Agropyron cristatum chromosome 5A/6P translocation lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128 (2015), 797–811.
58. Zhang, X., Huang, C., Wu, D., Qiao, F., Li, W., Duan, L., et al. High-throughput phenotyping and QTL mapping reveals the genetic architecture of maize plant growth. Plant Physiology, 2017 01516.2016.
59. Zhao, S.Q., Hu, J., Guo, L.B., Qian, Q., Xue, H.W., Rice leaf inclination2, a VIN3-like protein, regulates leaf angle through modulating cell division of the collar. Cell Research 20 (2010), 935–947.
60. Zhu, Y., Chang, L., Tang, L., Jiang, H., Zhang, W., Cao, W., Modelling leaf shape dynamics in rice. Wageningen Journal of Life Science 57 (2009), 73–81.
61. Zou, X., Möttus, M., Retrieving crop leaf tilt angle from imaging spectroscopy data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 205 (2015), 73–82.
62. Zou, X., Möttus, M., Tammeorg, P., Lizaraso Torres, C., Takala, T., Pisek, J., et al. Photographic measurement of leaf angles in field crops. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 184 (2014), 137–146.
63. Zystro, J.P., de Leon, N., Tracy, W.F., Analysis of traits related to weed competitiveness in sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Sustainability 4 (2012), 543–560.