Photographic measurement of leaf angles in field crops

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 184, Issue , 2014, Pages 137-146

  Zou, Xiaochen ^a   Mõttus, Matti ^a   Tammeorg, Priit ^a   Torres, Clara Lizarazo ^a   Takala, Tuure ^a   Pisek, Jan ^b   Mäkelä, Pirjo ^a   Stoddard, F L ^a   Pellikka, Petri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TARTU OBSERVATORY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Digital camera; Field crops; Leaf angle distribution; Spectral reflectance

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS; CROP PLANT; DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; TRANSMITTANCE;

EID: 84885762533     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abashina E.V., Gorbachev V.A. Leaf orientation in barley crops. Trans. Inst. Exp. Meteorol. 1977, 86:97-104. (in Russian).
2. Campbell G.S. Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1986, 36:317-321.
3. Campbell G.S. Derivation of an angle density function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1990, 49:173-176.
4. Campbell G.S., Norman J.M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics 1998, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
5. de Wit C.T. Photosynthesis of Leaf Canopies. Agricultural Research Report no. 663 1965, Wageningen.
6. Ehleringer J.R., Forseth I.N. Diurnal leaf movements and productivity in canopies. Plant Canopies, Their Growth, Form and Function 1989, 129-142. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G. Russell, B. Marshall, P.G. Jarvis (Eds.).
7. Goel N.S., Strebel D. Simple beta distribution representation of leaf orientation in vegetation canopies. Agron. J. 1984, 76:800-802.
8. Goudriaan J. The bare bones of leaf-angle distribution in radiation models for canopy photosynthesis and energy exchange. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1988, 43:155-169.
9. Gutschick V.P. Joining leaf photosynthesis models and canopy photon-transport models. Photon-Vegetation Interactions 1991, 501-535. Springer, Berlin. R.G. Myneni, J. Ross (Eds.).
10. Hosoi F., Nakai Y., Omasa K. Estimating the leaf inclination angle distribution of the wheat canopy using a portable scanning lidar. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2009, 65:297-302.
11. Houborg R., Soegaard H., Boegh E. Combining vegetation index and model inversion methods for the extraction of key vegetation biophysical parameters using Terra and Aqua MODIS reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 106:39-58.
12. Huang W.J., Niu Z., Wang J.H., Liu L.Y., Zhao C.J., Liu Q. Identifying crop leaf angle distribution based on two-temporal and bidirectional canopy reflectance. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44:3601-3609.
13. Jacquemoud S., Verhoef W., Baret F., Bacour C., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Asner G.P., François C., Ustin S.L. PROSPECT+SAIL models: a review of use for vegetation characterization. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113:S56-S66.
14. Knyazikhin Y., Schull M.A., Stenberg P., Mõttus M., Rautiainen M., Yang Y., Marshak A., Carmona P.L., Kaufmann R.K., Lewis P., Disney M.I., Vanderbilt V., Davis A.B., Baret F., Jacquemoud S., Lyapustin A., Myneni R. Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 110:185-192.
15. Kobayashi H., Ryu Y., Baldocchi D.D., Welles J.M., Norman J.M. On the correct estimation of gap fraction: how to remove scattered radiation in gap fraction measurements?. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 174-175:170-183.
16. Lang A.R.G. Leaf area and average leaf angle from transmission of direct sunlight. Aust. J. Bot. 1986, 34:349-355.
17. Lang A.R.G., Xiang Y.Q., Norman J.M. Crop structure and the penetration of direct sunlight. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1985, 35:83-101.
18. Mägi H., Ross J. Photosynthetic characteristics and photosynthetic productivity of a barley stand. II. Growth dynamics of the assimilation area and increase of the dry-matter content. Photosynthetic Productivity of a Plant Stand 1969, 143-173. Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Academy of Sciences of Estonian SSR, Tartu, (in Russian).
19. Nichiporovich A.A. On properties of plants as an optical system. Soviet J. Plant Physiol. 1961, 8:536-546. (in Russian).
20. Pisek J., Ryu Y., Alikas K. Estimating leaf inclination and G-function from leveled digital camera photography in broadleaf canopies. Trees 2011, 25:919-924.
21. Pisek J., Sonnentag O., Richardson A.D., Mõttus M. Is the spherical leaf inclination angle distribution a valid assumption for temperate and boreal broadleaf tree species?. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 169:186-194.
22. Reynolds M.P., Ginkel M., van, Ribaut J.-M. Avenues for genetic modification of radiation use efficiency in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51:459-473.
23. Ross J. The Radiation Regime and Architecture of Plant Stands 1981, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.
24. Ross J., Nilson T. The extinction of direct radiation in crops. Questions on Radiation Regime of Plant Stand 1965, 25-64. Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Academy of Sciences of Estonian SSR, Tartu, (in Russian).
25. Ross J., Nilson T. Balance of photosynthetically active radiation in plant stands. Radiation Regime in Plant Stands 1968, 5-54. Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Academy of Sciences of Estonian SSR, Tartu, (in Russian).
26. Ryu Y., Sonnentag O., Nilson T., Vargas R., Kobayashi H., Wenk R., Baldocchi D.D. How to quantify tree leaf area index in a heterogeneous savanna ecosystem: a multi-instrument and multi-model approach. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150:63-76.
27. Ryu Y., Nilson T., Kobayashi H., Sonnentag O., Law B.E., Baldocchi D.D. On the correct estimation of effective leaf area index: does it reveal information on clumping effects?. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150:463-472.
28. Scott D., Wells J.S. Leaf orientation in barley, lupin, and lucerne stands. N. Zeal. J. Bot. 1969, 7:372-388.
29. Sinoquet H., Thalisawanyangkura S., Mabrouk H., Kasemsap P. Characterization of the light environment in canopies using 3D digitizing and image processing. Ann. Bot. 1998, 82:203-212.
30. Viña A., Gitelson A.A., Nguy-Robertson A.L., Peng Y. Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:3468-3478.
31. Watson D.J. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Ann. Bot. 1947, 11:41-76.
32. Warren Wilson J.W. Stand structure and light penetration. III. Sunlit foliage area. J. Appl. Ecol. 1967, 4:159-165.
33. Wang W.M., Li Z.L., Su H.B. Comparison of leaf angle distribution functions: effects on extinction coefficient and fraction of sunlit foliage. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2007, 143:106-122.
34. Weiss M., Baret F., Smith G.J., Jonckheere I., Coppin P. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination. Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2004, 121:37-53.
35. WRB World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103 2007, FAO, Rome.