Any chance to evaluate in vivo field methods using standard protocols?

Field Crops Research

Volumn 161, Issue , 2014, Pages 128-136

  Confalonieri, R ^a   Francone, C ^a   Chiodini, M E ^a   Cantaluppi, E ^a   Caravati, L ^a   Colombi, V ^a   Fantini, D ^a   Ghiglieno, I ^a   Gilardelli, C ^a   Guffanti, E ^a   Inversini, M ^a   Paleari, L ^a   Pochettino, G G ^a   Bocchi, S ^a   Bregaglio, S ^a   Cappelli, G ^a   Dominoni, P ^a   Frasso, N ^a   Stella, T ^a   Acutis, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Chlorophyll meter; ISO 5725; Leaf color chart; Precision; Rice

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANALYTICAL METHOD; CHLOROPHYLL; COLOR; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA SET; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FIELD METHOD; GUIDELINE; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PRECISION; RICE; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 84898775517     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Acutis M., Trevisiol P., Confalonieri R., Bellocchi G., Grazioli E., van den Eede G., Paoletti C. Analytical Method Performance Evaluation (AMPE)-a software tool for analytical method validation. J. AOAC Int. 2007, 90:1432-1438.
2. Alam M.M., Ladha J.K., Khan S.R., Foyjunessa, Harun-ur-Rashid, Khan A.H., Buresh R.J. Leaf color chart for managing nitrogen fertilizer in lowland rice in Bangladesh. Agron. J. 2005, 97:949-959.
3. Balasubramanian V., Morales A.C., Cruz R.T., Abdulrachman S. On-farm adaptation of knowledge-intensive nitrogen management technologies for rice systems. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst. 1999, 53:59-69.
4. Balls M., Blaauboer B., Brusick D., Frazier J., Lamb D., Pemberton M., Reinhardt C., Roberfroid M., Rosenkranz H., Schmid B., Spielmann H., Stammati A.L., Walum E. Report and Recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT Workshop on the Validation of Toxicity Test Procedures 1990, 18:303-337. ATLA, Atlanta, USA.
5. Bocchi S., Confalonieri R., Frigeni S., Morari F., Patruno A. Wet aggregate stability index: precision assessment of Tiulin method through an inter-laboratory test. Agrochimica 2008, 52:71-82.
6. Bréda N.J.J. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54:2403-2417.
7. Cochran W.G. The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1941, 11:47-52.
8. Confalonieri R., Gusberti D., Bocchi S., Acutis M. The CropSyst model to simulate the N balance of rice for alternative management. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 2006, 26:241-249.
9. Confalonieri R., Perego A., Chiodini M.E., Scaglia B., Rosenmund A.S., Acutis M. Analysis of sample size for variables related to plant, soil, and soil microbial respiration in a paddy rice field. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113:125-130.
10. Confalonieri R., Foi M., Casa R., Aquaro S., Tona E., Peterle M., et al. Development of an app for estimating leaf area index using a smartphone. Trueness and precision determination and comparison with other indirect methods. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 96:67-74.
11. Fox D.G. Judging air quality model performance a summary of the AMS work-shop on dispersion models performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1981, 62:599-609.
12. Furuya S. Growth diagnosis of rice plants by means of leaf color. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q 1987, 20:147-153.
13. Garrigues S., Shabanov N.V., Swanson K., Morisette J.T., Baret F., Myneni R.B. Intercomparison and sensitivity analysis of Leaf Area Index retrievals from LAI-2000, AccuPAR, and digital hemispherical photography over croplands. Agr. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148:1193-1209.
14. Goldstein M. A Bayesian criterion for sample size. Ann. Stat. 1981, 9:670-672.
15. Golubev E.A., Fatkudinova S.R. ISO 5725 standard and reference laboratories: error requirements. Meas. Tech. 2006, 49:133-137.
16. Gomez K.A. Techniques for Field Experiment with Rice: Layout, Sampling, Sources of Error 1972, 48. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
17. Grubbs F.E. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 1969, 11:1-21.
18. Hyer E.J., Goetz Scott J. Comparison and sensitivity analysis of instruments and radiometric methods for LAI estimation: assessments from a boreal forest site. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2004, 122:157-174.
19. Horwitz W. Protocol of the design conduct and interpretation of method performance studies. Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67:331-343.
20. Hund E., Massart D.L., Smeyers-Verbeke J. Inter-laboratory studies in analytical chemistry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 423:145-165.
21. ISO 5725-2 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurements Methods and Results.-Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method 1994, International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
22. ISO 5725-6 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurements Methods and Results.-Part 6. Use in Practice of Accuracy Values 1994, International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
23. ISO 3534-2 Statistics-Vocabulary and Symbols.-Part 2: Applied Statistics 2006, International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
24. Justes E., Mary B., Meynard J.M., Machet J.M., Thelier-Huche L. Determination of a critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter wheat crops. Ann. Bot. 1994, 74:397-407.
25. Laird N.M., Ware J.H. Random effects model for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982, 38:963-974.
26. Lancashire P.D., Bleiholder H., Langelüddecke P., Stauss R., Van den Boom T., Weber E., Witzenberger A. An uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1991, 119:561-601.
27. Loague K., Green R.E. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1991, 7:51-73.
28. Menditto A., Patriarca M., Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 2007, 12:45-47.
29. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10:282-290.
30. Neilsen D., Hogue E.J., Neilsen G.H., Parchomchuk P. Using SPAD-502 values to assess the nitrogen status of apple trees. HortScience 1995, 30:508-512.
31. Peng S., Garcia F.V., Laza R.C., Sanico A.L., Visperas R.M., Cassman K.G. Increased N-use efficiency using a chlorophyll meter on high-yielding irrigated rice. Field Crops Res. 1996, 47:243-252.
32. Peper P.J., McPherson E.G. Evaluation of four methods for estimating leaf area of isolated trees. Urban For. Urban Gree. 2003, 2:19-29.
33. Pryseley A., Mintiens K., Knapen K., Van der Stede Y., Molenberghs G. Estimating precision, repeatability, and reproducibility form Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a mixed models approach. J. Appl. Stat. 2010, 37:1729-1747.
34. Rambla-Alegre M., Esteve-Romero J., Carda-Broch S. Is it really necessary to validate an analytical method or not? That is the question. J. Chromatogr. A. 2012, 1232:101-109.
35. San-oh Y., Sugiyama T., Yoshita D., Ookawa T., Hirasawa T. The effect of planting pattern on the rate of photosynthesis and related processes during ripening in rice plants. Field Crops Res. 2006, 96:113-124.
36. Scaglia B., Acutis M., Adani F. Precision determination for the dynamic respirometric index (DRI) method used for biological stability evaluation on municipal solid waste and derived products. Waste Manage. 2011, 31:2-9.
37. Scaglia B., Paradisi L., Adani F. Intra- and inter-laboratory variability in Real Dynamic Respiration Index (RDRI) method used to evaluate the potential rate of microbial self heating of solid recovered fuel. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:3591-3594.
38. Shukla A.K., Ladha J.K., Singh V.K., Dwivedi B.S., Balasubramanian V., Gupta R.K., Sharma S.K., Singh Y., Pathak H., Pandey P.S., Padre A.T., Yadav R.L. Calibrating the leaf color chart for nitrogen management in different genotypes of rice and wheat in a systems perspective. Agron. J. 2004, 96:1606-1621.
39. Slezák P., Waczulíková I. Reproducibility and repeatability. Physiol. Res. 2011, 60:203-204.
40. Storck L., Lopes S.J., Cargnelutti Filho A., Martini L.F.D., Carvalho M.P.de. Sample size for single, double and triple hybrid corn ear traits. Sci. Agric. 2007, 64:30-35.
41. Takebe M.T., Yoneyama T., Inada K., Murakami T. Spectral reflectance ratio of rice canopy for estimating crop nitrogen status. Plant Soil 1990, 122:295-297.
42. Turner F.T., Jund M.F. Chlorophyll meter to predict nitrogen topdress requirements for semidwarf rice. Agron. J. 1991, 83:926-928.
43. Verbeke G., Molenberghs G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data 2000, 568-569. Springer, New York, NY.
44. Watanabe S., Hatanaka Y., Inada K. Development of a digital chlorophyll meter: I. Structure and performance. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1980, 49:89-90. (spec. issue).
45. Wood R. How to validate analytical methods. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 1999, 18:624-663. (9+10).
46. Yang W.H., Peng S., Huang J., Sanico A.L., Buresh R.J., Witt C. Using leaf color charts to estimate leaf nitrogen status of rice. Agron. J. 2003, 95:212-217.