De novo PacBio long-read and phased avian genome assemblies correct and add to reference genes generated with intermediate and short reads

GigaScience

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2017, Pages

  Korlach, Jonas ^a   Gedman, Gregory ^b   Kingan, Sarah B ^a   Chin, Chen Shan ^a   Howard, Jason T ^b   Audet, Jean Nicolas ^b,c   Cantin, Lindsey ^b   Jarvis, Erich D ^b,d  

^a PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES   (United States)

^b ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; De novo genome assembly; Language; Long reads; SMRT Sequencing

Indexed keywords

DNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; AVIAN PROTEIN; EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE FACTOR 1; FORKHEAD TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE PHOSPHATASE 1; NERVE PROTEIN;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BASED INTERMEDIATE READ SEQUENCING; BASED LONG READ SEQUENCING; BASED SHORT READ SEQUENCING; BIRD; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DIPLOIDY; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNMT3A GENE; DRD4 GENE; DUSP1 GENE; EVOLUTION; FOXP2 GENE; FRAMESHIFT MUTATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC CODE; GENOME; GENOMICS; HAPLOTYPE; LEARNING; NEUROSCIENCE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; REFERENCE GENE; SANGER SEQUENCING; SAP30 GENE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SLIT1 GENE; VOCALIZATION; ANIMAL; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE;

ANIMALS; AVIAN PROTEINS; BIRDS; DUAL SPECIFICITY PHOSPHATASE 1; EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE PROTEIN 1; FEMALE; FORKHEAD TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; GENOME; MALE; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85032853801     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2047217X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/gix085     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E et al. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004;432:695-716.
2. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature 2010;464:757-62.
3. Shi Z, Luo G, Fu L et al. miR-9 and miR-140-5p target FoxP2 and are regulated as a function of the social context of singing behavior in zebra finches. Journal of Neuroscience 2013;33:16510-21.
4. Pfenning AR, Hara E, Whitney O et al. Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and songlearning birds. Science 2014;346:1256846.
5. Koepfli K-P, Paten B, O'Brien SJ et al. The genome 10K project: a way forward. Ann Rev Anim Biosci 2015;3:57-111.
6. Zhang G, Jarvis ED, Gilbert MTP. A flock of Genomes. Science 2014;346:1308-9.
7. Green RE, Braun EL, Armstrong J et al. Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs. Science 2014;346:1254449.
8. Zhang G, Li C, Li Q et al. Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 2014;346:1311-20.
9. Jarvis ED, Mirarab S, Aberer AJ et al. Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 2014;346:1320-31.
10. Joseph L, Buchanan KL. A quantum leap in avian biology. Emu 2015;115:1-5.
11. Kraus RHS, Wink M. Avian genomics: fledging into the wild! J Ornithol 2015;156:851-65.
12. Haug-Baltzell A, Jarvis ED, Mccarthy FM et al. Identification of dopamine receptors across the extant avian family tree and analysis with other clades uncovers a polyploid expansion among vertebrates. Front Neurosci 2015;9.
13. Horita H, Kobayashi M, LiuWet al. Specialized motor-driven dusp1 expression in the song systems of multiple lineages of vocal learning birds. PLoS One 2012;7:e42173.
14. Roberts RJ, CarneiroMO, Schatz MC. The advantages of SMRT sequencing. Genome Biol 2013;14:405.
15. Bradnam KR, Fass JN, Alexandrov A et al. Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species. Gigascience 2013;2:10.
16. Gordon D, Huddleston J, Chaisson MJP et al. Longread sequence assembly of the gorilla genome. Science 2016;352:aae0344.
17. Chairperson: Erich D. Jarvis Access date Sep 1st, 2017, https://genome10k.soe.ucsc.edu.
18. Director: Guojie Zhang Access date: Sep 1st, 2017, http://b10k.genomics.cn/index.html.
19. Chin J, et al. Access date: January 12, 2016, FALCON assembler. https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON/commit/a1180264c3c7d2de1c5eb55b3663dce093354dd7.
20. Chin C, Peluso P, Sedlazeck FJ et al. Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 2016;13:1050-4.
21. Gregory TR. Animal genome size database. 2017.
22. Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1061-7.
23. Parra G, Bradnam K, Ning Z et al. Assessing the gene space in draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:289-97.
24. Bradnum K Goodbye CEGMA hello BUSCO Blog: May 18, 2015 http://www.acgt.me/blog/2015/5/18/goodbye-cegmahello- busco.
25. Zdobnov EM, Tegenfeldt F, Kuznetsov D et al. OrthoDB v9.1: cataloging evolutionary and functional annotations for animal, fungal, plant, archaeal, bacterial and viral orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D744-9.
26. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P et al. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015;31:3210-2.
27. Zhang G, Li B, Li C et al. Genomic data of the Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna). GigaDB 2014. http://dx. doi.org/10.5524/101004.
28. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 2013;14:R36.
29. Jarvis ED, Yu J, Rivas MV et al. Global View of the functional molecular organization of the avian cerebrum: mirror images and functional columns. J Comp Neurol 2013;521:3614-65.
30. Whitney O, Pfenning AR, Howard JT et al. Core and regionenriched networks of behaviorally regulated genes and the singing genome. Science 2014;346:1256780.
31. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-9.
32. Shlyueva D, Stampfel G, Stark A. Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions. Nat Rev Genet 2014;15:272-86.
33. Veyrac A, Besnard A, Caboche J et al. The transcription factor Zif268/Egr1, brain plasticity, and memory. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2014;122:89-129.
34. Jarvis ED, Nottebohm F. Motor-driven gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:4097-102.
35. Flavell SW, Greenberg ME. Signaling mechanisms linking neuronal activity to gene expression and plasticity of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2008;31:563-90.
36. Cortés-Mendoza J, Díaz De Léon-Guerrero S, Pedraza-Alva G et al. Shaping synaptic plasticity: the role of activitymediated epigenetic regulation on gene transcription. Int J Dev Neurosci 2013;31:359-69.
37. Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R et al. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 2008;24:637-44.
38. Workman RE, Myrka AM, Tseng E et al. Single molecule, full-length transcript sequencing provides insight into the extreme metabolism of ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris. bioRxiv 2017. https://doi.org/10.1101/117218.
39. Liu Y-X, Wang J, Guo J et al. DUSP1 is controlled by p53 during the cellular response to oxidative stress. Mol Cancer Res 2008;6:624-33.
40. Horita H, Wada K, Rivas MV et al. The dusp1 immediate early gene is regulated by natural stimuli predominantly in sensory input neurons. J Comp Neurol 2010;518:2873-901.
41. Fisher SE, ScharffC. FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends Genet 2009;25:166-77.
42. Lai CSL, Fisher SE, Hurst JA et al. A forkhead-domain gene ismutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature 2001;413:519-23.
43. Turner SJ, Hildebrand MS, Block S et al. Small intragenic deletion in FOXP2 associated with childhood apraxia of speech and dysarthria. Am J Med Genet 2013;161A:2321-6.
44. Haesler S, Wada K, Nshdejan A et al. FoxP2 expression in avian vocal learners and non-learners. J Neurosci 2004;24:3164-75.
45. Teramitsu I, White SA. FoxP2 regulation during undirected singing in adult songbirds. J Neurosci 2006;26: 7390-4.
46. Haesler S, Rochefort C, Georgi B et al. Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus Area X. PLoS Biol 2007;5:e321.
47. Castellucci GA, Mcginley MJ, Mccormick DA. Knockout of Foxp2 disrupts vocal development in mice. Sci Rep 2016;6:23305.
48. Chabout J, Sarkar A, Patel SR et al. A Foxp2 mutation implicated in human speech deficits alters sequencing of ultrasonic vocalizations in adult malemice. Front Behav Neurosci 2016;10:197.
49. Condro MC, White SA. recent advances in the genetics of vocal learning. CCBR 2014;9:75-98.
50. BlockusH, Chédotal A. Themultifaceted roles of Slits and Robos in cortical circuits: from proliferation to axon guidance and neurological diseases. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2014;27:82-88.
51. Wang R, Chen CC, Hara E et al. Convergent differential regulation of SLIT-ROBO axon guidance genes in the brains of vocal learners. J Comp Neurol 2015;523:892-906.
52. Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL. Repetitive DNA and nextgeneration sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 2011;13:36-46.
53. Palazzo AF, Gregory TR, Akey JM. The case for junkDNA. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004351.
54. Chin C, Alexander DH, Marks P et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies fromlong-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013;10:563-9.
55. She R, Chu JS-C, Wang K et al. GenBlastA: enabling BLAST to identify homologous gene sequences. Genome Res 2009;19:143-9.
56. Slater G, Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:31.
57. Brind'Amour J, Liu S, Hudson M et al. An ultra-low-input native ChIP-seq protocol for genome-wide profiling of rare cell populations. Nat Commun 2015;6:6033.
58. Eöry L, Gilbert MT, Li C, Li B, Archibald A, Aken BL, Zhang G, Jarvis E, Flicek P, Burt DW. Avianbase: a community resource for bird genomics. Genome Biology 2015;16:21. http://avianbase.narf.ac.uk/index.html.
59. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature 2010;464:757-62. 2008 assembly, http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway?db=taeGut1.
60. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature 2010;464:757-62. 2013 assembly, http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway?db=taeGut2.
61. Hall T. Bioedit. Version date: July 25, 2017, http://www.mbio. ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html.
62. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999;41:95-98.
63. Krumsiek J, Arnold R, Rattei T Gepard: A rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1026-8. Access date: January 12th, 2017, http://cube.univie.ac.at/gepard.
64. Krumsiek J, Arnold R, Rattei T. Gepard: a rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1026-8.
65. Wu DU, Nacu S. Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 2010;26:873-881. Access date: August 16, 2016, http://research-pub.gene.com/gmap/.
66. Wu TD, Watanabe CK. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program formRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1859-75.
67. Korlach J, Gedman G, Kingan SB et al. De novo PacBio long-read and phased avian genome assemblies correct and add to reference genes generated with intermediate and short reads. GigaScience Database 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100311
68. Chakraborty M, Jarvis ED. Brain evolution by brain pathway duplication. Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci 2015;370(1684).