Corrigendum to “Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions” [Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33 (2017) 35–48](S2214629617303031)(10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024);Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 33, Issue , 2017, Pages 35-48

  Burke, Matthew J ^a   Stephens, Jennie C ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy democracy; Energy transition; Policy mix; Social movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032219793     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.030     Document Type: Erratum

References (117)

1. Angel, J., Strategies of Energy Democracy., 2016, Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung, Brussels, Belgium Retrieved from http://www.rosalux.eu/publications/strategies-of-energy-democracy-a-report/.
2. Healy, N., Barry, J., Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: fossil fuel divestment and a just transition. Energy Policy 108 (2017), 451–459, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014.
3. Araújo, K., The emerging field of energy transitions: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1 (2014), 112–121, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002.
4. Boyer, D., Energopower: an introduction. Anthropol. Q. 87:2 (2014), 309–333, 10.1353/anq.2014.0020.
5. Brown, L.R., Larsen, J., Roney, J.M., Adams, E.E., The Great Transition: Shifting from Fossil Fuels to Solar and Wind Energy. First edition, 2015, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
6. IRENA, REthinking Energy 2017: Accelerating the Global Energy Transformation. 2017, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi Retrieved from www.irena.org/publications.
7. Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A., Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part I: technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy 39:3 (2011), 1154–1169, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040.
8. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B., Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 41:6 (2012), 955–967, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
9. Arent, D., Arndt, C., Miller, M., Tarp, F., Zinaman, O., (eds.) The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transitions, 2017, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
10. Meadowcroft, J., What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci. 42:4 (2009), 323–340, 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z.
11. REN21, Renewables Global Futures Report: Great Debates Towards 100% Renewable Energy., 2017, REN21 Secretariat, Paris.
12. Stirling, A., Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1 (2014), 83–95, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001.
13. Miller, C.A., Iles, A., Jones, C.F., The social dimensions of energy transitions. Sci. Cult. 22:2 (2013), 135–148, 10.1080/09505431.2013.786989.
14. Duda, J., Energy, Democracy, Community. 2015 August 3, Retrieved June 27, 2016, from https://medium.com/@JohnDuda/energy-democracy-community-320660711cf4#.jtxijr47s.
15. Farrell, J., Beyond Sharing: How Communities can Take Ownership of Renewable Power (Energy Democracy Initiative)., 2016, Institute for Local Self-Reliance Retrieved from https://ilsr.org/report-beyond-sharing/.
16. EDANY, New York State Energy Democracy Alliance – Formation, Organization, and Moving Our Agenda: A Report from Our First 18 Months., 2016, Energy Democracy Alliance, New York, N.Y Retrieved from www.energydemocracyny.org.
17. Kunze, C., What is Energy Democracy?. 2014 Retrieved June 27, 2016, from http://energie-demokratie.de/what-is-energy-democracy/.
18. Angel, J., Towards Energy Democracy: Discussions and Outcomes from an International Workshop (Workshop Report)., 2016, Transnational Institute, Amsterdam.
19. Sweeney, S., Working toward energy democracy. State of the World 2014, 2014, Springer, 215–227.
20. Verbong, G., Geels, F., Future electricity systems: visions, scenarios and transition pathways. Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity?, 2012, Routledge, New York, 203–219.
21. Howlett, M., Rayner, J., Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design (No. 170–182). 2013, 10.12924/pag2013.01020170.
22. Kern, F., Howlett, M., Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sci. 42:4 (2009), 391–408, 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x.
23. Quitzow, R., Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India's National Solar Mission. Res. Policy 44:1 (2015), 233–243, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.003.
24. Kivimaa, P., Kern, F., Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 45:1 (2016), 205–217, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008.
25. Turnheim, B., Geels, F.W., Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy 50 (2012), 35–49, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060.
26. Howlett, M., From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sci. 47:3 (2014), 187–207, 10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0.
27. del Rio, P., On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: the case of renewable energy support schemes. Policy Sci. 47:3 (2014), 267–287, 10.1007/s11077-013-9189-7.
28. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M., Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Res. Policy 40:5 (2011), 702–713, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.
29. Rogge, K.S., Reichardt, K., Going Beyond Instrument Interactions: Towards a More Comprehensive Policy Mix Conceptualization for Environmental Technological Change, SWPS 2015-12 (April). 2015, Science Policy Research Unit, 1–47.
30. Burke, M.J., Stephens, J.C., Political Power and Renewable Energy Futures: A Critical Review. 2017 Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Sweeney, S., Resist, Reclaim, Restructure: Unions and the Struggle for Energy Democracy. 2013, Trade Unions for Energy Democracy/Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung April, Retrieved from http://unionsforenergydemocracy.org/resist-reclaim-restructure-unions-and-the-struggle-for-energy-democracy/.
32. Speth, J.G., Getting to the Next System: Guideposts on the Way to a New Political Economy (No. NSP Report 2)., 2015, The Next System Project Retrieved from http://thenextsystem.org/gettowhatsnext/.
33. Weinrub, A., Giancatarino, A., Toward a Climate Justice Energy Platform: Democratizing Our Energy Future. 2015, Local Clean Energy Alliance/Center for Social Inclusion Retrieved from localcleanenergy.org.
34. Duda, J., Hanna, T., Burke, M., Building Community Capacity for Energy Democracy: A Deck of Strategies. 2016, Democracy Collaborative p. 23, Retrieved from http://www.thenextsystem.org/building-community-capacity-for-energy-democracy/?mc_cid=2ce36b4895&mc_eid=13ffb04686.
35. Energy Democracy Project, What is the Energy Democracy Project?. 2015, Local Clean Energy Alliance Retrieved from http://www.localcleanenergy.org/EnergyDemocracy.
36. Weinrub, A., Expressions of Energy Democracy: Perspectives on an Emerging Movement. 2014, Local Clean Energy Alliance, Oakland, CA Retrieved from www.localcleanenergy.org.
37. Trade Unions for Energy Democracy, Our History. 2015 Retrieved June 27, 2016, from http://unionsforenergydemocracy.org/about/our-history/.
38. Tokar, B., Democracy, localism, and the future of the climate movement. World Futures 71:3–4 (2015), 65–75, 10.1080/02604027.2015.1092785.
39. Morris, Jungjohann, A., Energy Democracy: Germanys Energiewende to Renewables. 2016, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
40. Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., Rehner, R., Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science 11 (2016), 174–182, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004.
41. Chavez, D., Dove, F., The Meaning, Relevance and Scope of Energy Democracy. 2015 Retrieved June 27, 2016, from https://www.tni.org/en/article/the-meaning-relevance-and-scope-of-energy-democracy.
42. Giancatarino, A., Community-Scale Energy: Models, Strategies and Racial Equity – A Scan of Community Innovation Around Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 2013, Center for Social Inclusion, New York, N.Y.
43. Moss, T., Sociotechnical change and the politics of urban infrastructure: managing energy in Berlin between dictatorship and democracy. Urban Stud. 51:7 (2014), 1432–1448, 10.1177/0042098013500086.
44. Thompson, G., Bazilian, M., Democratization, energy poverty, and the pursuit of symmetry. Glob. Policy 5:1 (2014), 127–131, 10.1111/1758-5899.12103.
45. CSI, Energy Democracy: Community-Scale Green Energy Solutions. 2010, Center for Social Inclusion, New York, N.Y Retrieved from centerforsocialinclusion.org.
46. Lohmann, L., Hildyard, N., Energy, Work and Finance. 2014, Corner House, Dorset, UK Retrieved from http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk.
47. Farrell, J., Beyond Utility 2.0 to Energy Democracy (Democratic Energy Initiative)., 2014, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, Minneapolis; Portland; Washington, DC Retrieved from https://ilsr.org/report-energy-democracy/.
48. Van der Schoor, T., van Lente, H., Scholtens, B., Peine, A., Challenging obduracy: how local communities transform the energy system. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13 (2016), 94–105, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.009.
49. Hoffman, S.M., High-Pippert, A., Community energy: a social architecture for an alternative energy future. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 25:5 (2005), 387–401, 10.1177/0270467605278880.
50. Morris, D., Seeing the Light. 2001, Institute for Local Self-Reliance Retrieved from https://www.pharosproject.net/uploads/files/sources/1/1349813941.pdf.
51. Byrne, J., Taminiau, J., A review of sustainable energy utility and energy service utility concepts and applications: realizing ecological and social sustainability with a community utility: review of SEU and energy service utility concepts and applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Energy Environ. 5:2 (2016), 136–154, 10.1002/wene.171.
52. CSI, Energy Democracy: Community-Led Solutions – Three Case Studies. 2013, Center for Social Inclusion, New York, N.Y Retrieved from centerforsocialinclusion.org.
53. Agustoni, A., Maretti, M., Energy and social change: an introduction. Int. Rev. Sociol. 22:3 (2012), 391–404, 10.1080/03906701.2012.730820.
54. Bronin, S.C., Curbing energy sprawl with microgrids. Conn. Law Rev., 43(2), 2010 Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1594515.
55. Wellinghoff, J., Weissman, S., Right to self-generate as a grid-connected customer. Energy LJ, 36, 2015, 305.
56. Farrell, J., Virtual Net Metering. 2016 Retrieved from https://ilsr.org/virtual-net-metering/.
57. Sweeney, S., Energy Democracy in Greece: SYRIZA's Program and the Transition to Renewable Power (Working Paper #3). 2015, Trade Unions for Energy Democracy Retrieved from http://www.rosalux.eu/publications/.
58. Wiser, R., Barbose, G., Heeter, J., Mai, T., Bird, L., Bolinger, M., et al. A Retrospective Analysis of the Benefits and Impacts of US Renewable Portfolio Standards. 2016, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Retrieved from http://climate-xchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Renewable-Energy-Standards-Study.pdf.
59. Calland, R., Nakhooda, S., Participatory democracy meets the hard rock of energy policy: South Africa's national integrated resource plan. Democratization 19:5 (2012), 912–931, 10.1080/13510347.2012.709688.
60. Peterson, T.R., Stephens, J.C., Wilson, E.J., Public perception of and engagement with emerging low-carbon energy technologies: a literature review. MRS Energy Sustain., 2, 2015, 10.1557/mre.2015.12.
61. Arnstein, S.R., A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 35:4 (1969), 216–224, 10.1080/01944366908977225.
62. Canfield, C., Klima, K., Dawson, T., Using deliberative democracy to identify energy policy priorities in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 8 (2015), 184–189, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.008.
63. Shaw, K., Hill, S.D., Boyd, A.D., Monk, L., Reid, J., Einsiedel, E.F., Conflicted or constructive? Exploring community responses to new energy developments in Canada. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 8 (2015), 41–51, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.003.
64. LEAN Energy US, Lean Energy U.S. – California. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.leanenergyus.org/cca-by-state/california/.
65. Clean Power Exchange, Clean Power Exchange. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://cleanpowerexchange.org/.
66. Local Government Commission, Community Choice Aggregation Fact Sheet. 2016, State of California Energy Commission and U.S. Department of Energy, Sacramento, CA Retrieved from https://www.lgc.org.
67. Willdan/EnerNex, City of San Diego Feasibility Study for a Community Choice Aggregate. 2017, Willdan/EnerNex, City of San Diego/San Diego, CA.
68. Barrera-Hernández, L.K., Barton, B., Godden, L., Lucas, A.R., Rønne, A., (eds.) Sharing the Costs and Benefits of Energy and Resource Activity: Legal Change and Impact on Communities, First edition, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
69. De Barbieri, E.W., Do Community Benefits Agreements Benefit Communities?. 2016 Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2802409.
70. Couture, T.D., Cory, K., Kreycik, C., Williams, E., A Policymaker's Guide to Feed-In Tariff Policy Design (Technical Report No. NREL/TP-6A2-44849)., 2010, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Retrieved from http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/44849.pdf.
71. Mendonça, M., Jacobs, D., Sovacool, B.K., Powering the Green Economy: The Feed-In Tariff Handbook. 2010, Earthscan, London; Sterling, VA.
72. Grösche, P., Schröder, C., On the redistributive effects of Germany's feed-in tariff. Empir. Econ. 46:4 (2014), 1339–1383, 10.1007/s00181-013-0728-z.
73. NREL, State and Local Governments – Clean Energy Policy Basics. 2016 Retrieved January 22, 2017, from http://www.nrel.gov/tech_deployment/state_local_governments/policy_basics.html.
74. US DOE, State and Local Solution Center. 2017 Retrieved January 22, 2017, from https://energy.gov/eere/slsc/state-and-local-solution-center.
75. NYSERDA, On-Bill Recovery Financing Program. 2017, New York State Energy Research & Development Authority Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/All-Programs/Programs/On-Bill-Recovery-Financing-Program.
76. IEC, Iowa Energy Center. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.iowaenergycenter.org/.
77. Climate Bonds Initiative, US Green City Bonds Coalition. 2015 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.climatebonds.net/get-involved/green-city-bond-campaign/US.
78. BED, Burlington Electric Department. 2016 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.burlingtonelectric.com/.
79. Parry, I.W.H., Morris, A.C., Williams, R.C., (eds.) Implementing a US Carbon Tax: Challenges and Debates, 2015, Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, N.J.
80. Carbon Tax Center, Pricing Carbon Efficiently and Equitably. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.carbontax.org/.
81. Shah, T., Beckstead, C., Local Climate Action in British Columbia: Motivations and Policy Implications. 2012, Pembina Institute Retrieved from http://www.pembina.org/pub/2373.
82. Kunkel, C.M., Kammen, D.M., Design and implementation of carbon cap and dividend policies. Energy Policy 39:1 (2011), 477–486, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.046.
83. Gilpin, L., How Crowdfunding Solar Power is Democratizing the Way we Finance Clean Energy. 2014, TechRepublic March 13, Retrieved from http://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-crowdfunding-solar-power-is-democratizing-the-way-we-finance-clean-energy/.
84. Mishra, A., Top 5 Renewable Energy Crowdfunding Platforms. 2014, Renewable Energy World July 18, Retrieved from http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/ugc/articles/2014/07/top-5-renewable-energy-crowdfunding-platforms.html.
85. APPA, Public Power: Shining a Light on Public Service. 2015, American Public Power Association Retrieved from https://www.publicpower.org/.
86. US DOE, Community Renewable Energy. 2017 Retrieved January 18, 2017, from http://apps3.eere.energy.gov/greenpower/community_development/.
87. NRECA, America's Electric Cooperatives. 2016 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.electric.coop/.
88. CPN, Working Together for Local, Renewable Energy. 2017, Community Power Network Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://communitypowernetwork.com/.
89. Evergreen Cooperative, Evergreen Cooperatives. 2016 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.evgoh.com/.
90. Luna, A.C., Diaz, N.L., Graells, M., Vasquez, J.C., Guerrero, J.M., Cooperative energy management for a cluster of household prosumers. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 62:3 (2016), 235–242, 10.1109/TCE.2016.7613189.
91. Becker, S., Beveridge, R., Naumann, M., Remunicipalization in German cities: contesting neo-liberalism and reimagining urban governance?. Space Polity 19:1 (2015), 76–90, 10.1080/13562576.2014.991119.
92. Cumbers, A., Reclaiming Public Ownership: Making Space for Economic Democracy. 2012, Zed Books, London; New York, NY.
93. Stephens, J.C., Wilson, E.J., Peterson, T.R., Smart Grid (R)Evolution: Electric Power Struggles. 2015, Cambridge University Press, New York, 10.1017/CBO9781107239029.
94. City of Boulder, Energy Future. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://bouldercolorado.gov/energy-future.
95. Goerner, S., Corrective lenses: how the laws of energy networks improve our economic vision. World Futures 69:7–8 (2013), 402–449, 10.1080/02604027.2013.835962.
96. CT Green Bank, Accelerating Green Energy Adoption in CT. 2017, CT Green Bank Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://ctgreenbank.com/.
97. Giancatarino, A., Energy Investment District (EIDs): Policy Concept Paper. 2014, Center for Social Inclusion, New York, New York Retrieved from http://www.centerforsocialinclusion.org/energy-investment-districts-a-racially-equitable-solution/.
98. ®. 2016 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.dsireusa.org/.
99. Farrell, J., Democratizing the electricity system. New Rules Project, 2011, 23 Retrieved from http://atcscam.homestead.com/democratizing-electricity-system.pdf.
100. Grimley, M., Farrell, J., Mighty Microgrids (Energy Democracy Initiative). 2016, Institute for Local Self-Reliance Retrieved from https://ilsr.org.
101. Wolsink, M., The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:1 (2012), 822–835, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006.
102. Clean Coalition, Clean Coalition. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.clean-coalition.org/.
103. Späth, P., Rohracher, H., ‘Energy regions’: the transformative power of regional discourses on sociotechnical futures. Res. Policy 39:4 (2010), 449–458, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017.
104. Green, J., Energy Democracy: Co-Op Power – A Profile in Cooperative Ownership. 2016, Center for Social Inclusion, New York, N.Y Retrieved from http://www.centerforsocialinclusion.org/category/publications/.
105. Gerstle, B., Giving landowners the power: a democratic approach for assembling transmission corridors. J. Environ. Law Litig., 29, 2014, 535.
106. Houck, J., Rickerson, W., The sustainable energy utility (SEU) model for energy service delivery. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 29:2 (2009), 95–107, 10.1177/0270467608330023.
107. Energize Delaware, Home Page – DESEU Information. 2017 Retrieved July 15, 2017, from https://www.energizedelaware.org/.
108. Tarhan, M.D., Renewable energy co-operatives and energy democracy: a critical perspective. Presented at the Canadian Association for Studies in Co-operation, Toronto, ON, 2017 Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317369738_Renewable_Energy_Co-operatives_and_Energy_Democracy_A_Critical_Perspective.
109. Byrne, J., Martinez, C., Ruggero, C., Relocating energy in the social commons: ideas for a sustainable energy utility. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 29:2 (2009), 81–94, 10.1177/0270467609332315.
110. Melville, E., Christie, I., Burningham, K., Way, C., Hampshire, P., The electric commons: a qualitative study of community accountability. Energy Policy 106 (2017), 12–21, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.035.
111. Ostrom, E., Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:3 (2010), 641–672, 10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
112. Berkes, F., Folke, C., Colding, J., Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York, NY, USA.
113. Geels, F.W., Schot, J., Typology of socioechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 36:3 (2007), 399–417, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
114. McGinnis, M.D., Ostrom, E., Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol. Soc., 19(2), 2014, 10.5751/es-06387-190230.
115. Ostrom, E., A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:5939 (2009), 419–422, 10.1126/science.1172133.
116. Howlett, M., Rayner, J., Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy Soc. 26:4 (2007), 1–18, 10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2.
117. Polanyi, K., The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2nd Beacon Paperback ed). 2001, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.