Corrigendum to “Combining region-and network-level brain-behavior relationships in a structural equation model” [Neuroimage 165 (2018) 158–169] (S1053811917308200) (10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.007));Combining region- and network-level brain-behavior relationships in a structural equation model

NeuroImage

Volumn 165, Issue , 2018, Pages 158-169

  Bolt, Taylor ^a   Prince, Emily B ^a   Nomi, Jason S ^a   Messinger, Daniel ^a   Llabre, Maria M ^a   Uddin, Lucina Q ^a,b  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASK POSITIVE NETWORK; WORKING MEMORY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85032209392     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.035     Document Type: Erratum

References (87)

1. Aghajani, M., Veer, I.M., van Tol, M.-J., Aleman, A., van Buchem, M.A., Veltman, D.J., van der Wee, N.J., Neuroticism and extraversion are associated with amygdala resting-state functional connectivity. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14:2 (2014), 836–848, 10.3758/s13415-013-0224-0.
2. Ansari, D., Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9:4 (2008), 278–291, 10.1038/nrn2334.
3. Badgaiyan, R.D., Schacter, D.L., Alpert, N.M., Retrieval of relational information: a role for the left inferior prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage 17:1 (2002), 393–400.
4. Barbey, A.K., Koenigs, M., Grafman, J., Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex J. Devoted Study Nerv. Syst. Behav. 49:5 (2013), 1195–1205, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022.
5. Barch, D.M., Braver, T.S., Nystrom, L.E., Forman, S.D., Noll, D.C., Cohen, J.D., Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 35:10 (1997), 1373–1380, 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00072-9.
6. Barch, D.M., Burgess, G.C., Harms, M.P., Petersen, S.E., Schlaggar, B.L., Corbetta, M., WU-Minn HCP Consortium. Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. NeuroImage 80 (2013), 169–189, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.033.
7. Bassett, D.S., Bullmore, E., Verchinski, B.A., Mattay, V.S., Weinberger, D.R., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and Schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 28:37 (2008), 9239–9248, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-08.2008.
8. Beaty, R.E., Kaufman, S.B., Benedek, M., Jung, R.E., Kenett, Y.N., Jauk, E., Silvia, P.J., Personality and complex brain networks: the role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37:2 (2016), 773–779, 10.1002/hbm.23065.
9. Bentler, P.M., On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Pers. Individ. Differ. 42:5 (2007), 825–829, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024.
10. Bullmore, E., Sporns, O., Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10:3 (2009), 186–198, 10.1038/nrn2575.
11. Bunge, S.A., Helskog, E.H., Wendelken, C., Left, but not right, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex meets a stringent test of the relational integration hypothesis. NeuroImage 46:1 (2009), 338–342, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.064.
12. Butterworth, B., Walsh, V., Neural basis of mathematical cognition. Curr. Biol. 21:16 (2011), R618–R621, 10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.005.
13. Byrne, B.M., Structural Equation Modeling with Lisrel, Prelis, and Simplis: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 1 edition, 1998, Psychology Press, Mahwah, N.J.
14. Calhoun, V.D., Kiehl, K.A., Pearlson, G.D., Modulation of temporally coherent brain networks estimated using ICA at rest and during cognitive tasks. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29:7 (2008), 828–838, 10.1002/hbm.20581.
15. Chen, F., Curran, P.J., Bollen, K.A., Kirby, J., Paxton, P., An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods & Res. 36:4 (2008), 462–494, 10.1177/0049124108314720.
16. Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J.K., Holyoak, K.J., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage 14:5 (2001), 1136–1149, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0922.
17. Clarke, K.A., The phantom menace: omitted variable bias in econometric research. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 22:4 (2005), 341–352, 10.1080/07388940500339183.
18. Cole, D.M., Smith, S.M., Beckmann, C.F., Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 4, 2010, 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00008.
19. Cole, M.W., Reynolds, J.R., Power, J.D., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A., Braver, T.S., Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control. Nat. Neurosci. 16:9 (2013), 1348–1355 https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3470.
20. Comrey, A.L., Lee, H.B., A First Course in Factor Analysis. second ed., 1992, Psychology Press, Hillsdale, N.J.
21. Cook, R.D., Weisberg, S., Residuals and Influence in Regression. 1982, Chapman & Hall.
22. Crossley, N.A., Mechelli, A., Vértes, P.E., Winton-Brown, T.T., Patel, A.X., Ginestet, C.E., Bullmore, E.T., Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:28 (2013), 11583–11588, 10.1073/pnas.1220826110.
23. Curtis, C.E., D'Esposito, M., Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:9 (2003), 415–423, 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00197-9.
24. Damoiseaux, J.S., Rombouts, S.a.R.B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C.J., Smith, S.M., Beckmann, C.F., Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103:37 (2006), 13848–13853, 10.1073/pnas.0601417103.
25. de Marco, G., Vrignaud, P., Destrieux, C., de Marco, D., Testelin, S., Devauchelle, B., Berquin, P., Principle of structural equation modeling for exploring functional interactivity within a putative network of interconnected brain areas. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27:1 (2009), 1–12, 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.003.
26. Disbrow, E.A., Carmichael, O., He, J., Lanni, K.E., Dressler, E.M., Zhang, L., Sigvardt, K.A., Resting state functional connectivity is associated with cognitive dysfunction in non-demented people with Parkinson's disease. J. Parkinson's Dis. 4:3 (2014), 453–465, 10.3233/JPD-130341.
27. Doucet, G., Naveau, M., Petit, L., Delcroix, N., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Joliot, M., Brain activity at rest: a multiscale hierarchical functional organization. J. Neurophysiol. 105:6 (2011), 2753–2763, 10.1152/jn.00895.2010.
28. Fan, X., Thompson, B., Wang, L., Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 6:1 (1999), 56–83, 10.1080/10705519909540119.
29. Ferrarini, L., Veer, I.M., Baerends, E., van Tol, M.-J., Renken, R.J., van der Wee, N.J.A., Milles, J., Hierarchical functional modularity in the resting-state human brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30:7 (2009), 2220–2231, 10.1002/hbm.20663.
30. Fornito, A., Harrison, B.J., Zalesky, A., Simons, J.S., Competitive and cooperative dynamics of large-scale brain functional networks supporting recollection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109:31 (2012), 12788–12793, 10.1073/pnas.1204185109.
31. Fox, M.D., Snyder, A.Z., Vincent, J.L., Corbetta, M., Essen, D.C.V., Raichle, M.E., The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:27 (2005), 9673–9678, 10.1073/pnas.0504136102.
32. Friston, K.J., Harrison, L., Penny, W., Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 19:4 (2003), 1273–1302, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7.
33. Gates, K.M., Molenaar, P.C.M., Hillary, F.G., Slobounov, S., Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. NeuroImage 54:2 (2011), 1151–1158, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.051.
34. Glasser, M.F., Sotiropoulos, S.N., Wilson, J.A., Coalson, T.S., Fischl, B., Andersson, J.L., WU-Minn HCP Consortium. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 80 (2013), 105–124, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127.
35. Gordon, E.M., Laumann, T.O., Adeyemo, B., Huckins, J.F., Kelley, W.M., Petersen, S.E., Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb. Cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 26:1 (2016), 288–303, 10.1093/cercor/bhu239.
36. Grabner, R.H., Ansari, D., Reishofer, G., Stern, E., Ebner, F., Neuper, C., Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation. NeuroImage 38:2 (2007), 346–356, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.041.
37. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Multivariate Data Analysis. 2013, Pearson Education Limited.
38. Hampson, M., Driesen, N.R., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J.C., Constable, R.T., Brain connectivity related to working memory performance. J. Neurosci. 26:51 (2006), 13338–13343, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-06.2006.
39. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3:4 (1998), 424–453, 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.
40. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 6:1 (1999), 1–55, 10.1080/10705519909540118.
41. Hubbard, E.M., Arman, A.C., Ramachandran, V.S., Boynton, G.M., Individual differences among grapheme-color synesthetes: brain-behavior correlations. Neuron 45:6 (2005), 975–985, 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.008.
42. Iacobucci, D., Structural equations modeling: fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J. Consum. Psychol. 20:1 (2010), 90–98, 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003.
43. James, G.A., Kelley, M.E., Craddock, R.C., Holtzheimer, P.E., Dunlop, B., Nemeroff, C., Hu, X.P., Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling of Resting-state fMRI: applicability of group models to individual subjects. NeuroImage 45:3 (2009), 778–787, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.049.
44. Karunanayaka, P., Eslinger, P.J., Wang, J.-L., Weitekamp, C.W., Molitoris, S., Gates, K.M., Yang, Q.X., Networks involved in olfaction and their dynamics using independent component analysis and unified structural equation modeling. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35:5 (2014), 2055–2072, 10.1002/hbm.22312.
45. Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P.M., Ernst, T., Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28:2 (2007), 85–93, 10.1002/hbm.20259.
46. Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W.K., Bellgowan, P.S., Baker, C.I., Circular analysis in systems neuroscience – the dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 12:5 (2009), 535–540, 10.1038/nn.2303.
47. Krmpotich, T.D., Tregellas, J.R., Thompson, L.L., Banich, M.T., Klenk, A.M., Tanabe, J.L., Resting-state activity in the left executive control network is associated with behavioral approach and is increased in substance dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 129:1–2 (2013), 1–7, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.01.021.
48. Laird, A.R., Eickhoff, S.B., Rottschy, C., Bzdok, D., Ray, K.L., Fox, P.T., Networks of task co-activations. NeuroImage 80 (2013), 505–514, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.073.
49. Leech, R., Kamourieh, S., Beckmann, C.F., Sharp, D.J., Fractionating the default mode network: distinct contributions of the ventral and dorsal posterior cingulate cortex to cognitive control. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 31:9 (2011), 3217–3224, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5626-10.2011.
50. Leergaard, T.B., Hilgetag, C.C., Sporns, O., Mapping the connectome: multi-level analysis of brain connectivity. Front. Neuroinformatics, 6, 2012, 10.3389/fninf.2012.00014.
51. MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., Hong, S., Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol. Methods 4:1 (1999), 84–99, 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84.
52. Meunier, D., Lambiotte, R., Bullmore, E.T., Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Front. Neurosci., 4, 2010, 10.3389/fnins.2010.00200.
53. Mišić, B., Sporns, O., From regions to connections and networks: new bridges between brain and behavior. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 40 (2016), 1–7, 10.1016/j.conb.2016.05.003.
54. Molenberghs, P., Trautwein, F.-M., Böckler, A., Singer, T., Kanske, P., Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 2016, nsw093, 10.1093/scan/nsw093.
55. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O., Mplus User's Guide. sixth ed., 2011, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
56. Nelson, S.M., Savalia, N.K., Fishell, A.K., Gilmore, A.W., Zou, F., Balota, D.A., McDermott, K.B., Default mode network activity predicts early memory decline in healthy young adults aged 18–31. Cereb. Cortex 26:8 (2016), 3379–3389, 10.1093/cercor/bhv165.
57. Owen, A.M., McMillan, K.M., Laird, A.R., Bullmore, E., N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25:1 (2005), 46–59, 10.1002/hbm.20131.
58. Peterson, R.A., A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Mark. Lett. 11:3 (2000), 261–275, 10.1023/A:1008191211004.
59. Poldrack, R.A., Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2:1 (2007), 67–70, 10.1093/scan/nsm006.
60. Poldrack, R.A., Farah, M.J., Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature 526:7573 (2015), 371–379, 10.1038/nature15692.
61. Power, J.D., Cohen, A.L., Nelson, S.M., Wig, G.S., Barnes, K.A., Church, J.A., Petersen, S.E., Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72:4 (2011), 665–678, 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006.
62. Preacher, K.J., Zyphur, M.J., Zhang, Z., A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol. Methods 15:3 (2010), 209–233, 10.1037/a0020141.
63. Price, G.R., Mazzocco, M.M.M., Ansari, D., Why mental arithmetic counts: brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. J. Neurosci. 33:1 (2013), 156–163, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2936-12.2013.
64. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., Pickles, A., Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika 69:2 (2004), 167–190, 10.1007/BF02295939.
65. Reise, S.P., Invited paper: the rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 47:5 (2012), 667–696, 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
66. Reise, S.P., Morizot, J., Hays, R.D., The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Qual. Life Res. Int. J. Qual. Life Asp. Treat. Care Rehabil. 16:Suppl. 1 (2007), 19–31, 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.
67. Rypma, B., D'Esposito, M., The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96:11 (1999), 6558–6563, 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6558.
68. Schlösser, R.G.M., Wagner, G., Sauer, H., Assessing the working memory network: studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging and structural equation modeling. Neuroscience 139:1 (2006), 91–103, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.037.
69. Smith, S.M., Fox, P.T., Miller, K.L., Glahn, D.C., Fox, P.M., Mackay, C.E., Beckmann, C.F., Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:31 (2009), 13040–13045, 10.1073/pnas.0905267106.
70. Steiger, J.H., Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers. Individ. Differ. 42:5 (2007), 893–898, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.
71. Stephan, K.E., Marshall, J.C., Friston, K.J., Rowe, J.B., Ritzl, A., Zilles, K., Fink, G.R., Lateralized cognitive processes and lateralized task control in the human brain. Sci. (New York, N.Y.) 301:5631 (2003), 384–386, 10.1126/science.1086025.
72. Sternberg, S., The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychol. 30 (1969), 276–315, 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9.
73. ® 155:2 (2014), 292–298, 10.1016/j.pain.2013.10.007.
74. Sugawara, H.M., MacCallum, R.C., Effect of estimation method on incremental fit indexes for covariance structure models. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 17:4 (1993), 365–377, 10.1177/014662169301700405.
75. Suk, H.-I., Wee, C.-Y., Lee, S.-W., Shen, D., State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI. NeuroImage 129 (2016), 292–307, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.005.
76. Todd, J.J., Marois, R., Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity. Cogn., Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 5:2 (2005), 144–155, 10.3758/CABN.5.2.144.
77. Toit, S. H. C. du, Toit, M. du, Multilevel structural equation modeling. de Leeuw, J., Meijer, E., (eds.) Handbook of Multilevel Analysis, 2008, Springer New York, 435–478, 10.1007/978-0-387-73186-5_12.
78. Van Essen, D.C., Smith, S.M., Barch, D.M., Behrens, T.E.J., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K., The WU-Minn human connectome Project: an overview. NeuroImage 80 (2013), 62–79, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041.
79. Vossel, S., Weidner, R., Moos, K., Fink, G.R., Individual attentional selection capacities are reflected in interhemispheric connectivity of the parietal cortex. NeuroImage 129 (2016), 148–158, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.054.
80. Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., Pashler, H., Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4:3 (2009), 274–290, 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x.
81. Wang, K., Liang, M., Wang, L., Tian, L., Zhang, X., Li, K., Jiang, T., Altered functional connectivity in early Alzheimer's disease: a resting-state fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28:10 (2007), 967–978, 10.1002/hbm.20324.
82. Xia, M., Wang, J., He, Y., BrainNet viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One, 8(7), 2013, e68910, 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910.
83. Yarkoni, T., Big Correlations in Little Studies: inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power—commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4:3 (2009), 294–298, 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01127.x.
84. Yarkoni, T., Braver, T.S., Cognitive neuroscience approaches to individual differences in working memory and executive control: conceptual and methodological issues. Gruszka, A., Matthews, G., Szymura, B., (eds.) Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition, 2010, Springer New York, 87–107, 10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_6.
85. Yeo, B.T.T., Krienen, F.M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M.R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Buckner, R.L., The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106:3 (2011), 1125–1165, 10.1152/jn.00338.2011.
86. Zanto, T.P., Gazzaley, A., Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci., 17(12), 2013, 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.001.
87. Zhuang, J., LaConte, S., Peltier, S., Zhang, K., Hu, X., Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination. NeuroImage 25:2 (2005), 462–470, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.007.