Principle of structural equation modeling for exploring functional interactivity within a putative network of interconnected brain areas

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-12

  de Marco, Giovanni ^a   Vrignaud, Pierre ^b   Destrieux, Christophe ^c   de Marco, Damien ^a   Testelin, Sylvie ^a   Devauchelle, Bernard ^a   Berquin, Patrick ^a  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^c Université de Tours   (France)

Author keywords

Effective connectivity; Integration; Model; Network; SEM

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; SYNAPSE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 57249105186     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.003     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Morris J.S., Friston K.J., Buchel C., et al. A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain 121 Pt 1 (1998) 47-57
2. Killgore W.D., and Yurgelun-Todd D.A. Activation of the amygdala and anterior cingulate during nonconscious processing of sad versus happy faces. NeuroImage 21 4 (2004) 1215-1223
3. Wild B., Erb M., Eyb M., Bartels M., and Grodd W. Why are smiles contagious? An fMRI study of the interaction between perception of facial affect and facial movements. Psychiatry Res 123 1 (2003) 17-36
4. de Marco G., de Bonis M., Vrignaud P., Henry-Feugeas M.C., and Peretti I. Changes in effective connectivity during incidental and intentional perception of fearful faces. NeuroImage 30 3 (2006) 1030-1037
5. Pallier C., Dehaene S., Poline J.B., et al. Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: can a second language replace the first?. Cereb Cortex 13 2 (2003) 155-161
6. Lee L., Harrison L., and Mechelli A. A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf. NeuroImage (2003) 457-465
7. Mesulam M.M. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol 28 5 (1990) 597-613
8. Fu C.H., McIntosh A.R., Kim J., et al. Modulation of effective connectivity by cognitive demand in phonological verbal fluency. NeuroImage 30 1 (2006) 266-271
9. Vitali P., Abutalebi J., Tettamanti M., et al. Generating animal and tool names: an fMRI study of effective connectivity. Brain Lang 93 1 (2005) 32-45
10. Friston K.J., Buechel C., Fink G.R., Morris J., Rolls E., and Dolan R.J. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage 6 3 (1997) 218-229
11. Friston K. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum Brain Mapp 2 (1994) 56-78
12. Heeger D.J., and Ress D. What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?. Nat Rev Neurosci 3 2 (2002) 142-151
13. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., and Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412 6843 (2001) 150-157
14. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and application to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 65 (1993) 413-497
15. Nunez P.L., and Silberstein R.B. On the relationship of synaptic activity to macroscopic measurements: does co-registration of EEG with fMRI make sense?. Brain Topogr 13 2 (2000) 79-96
16. Attwell D., and Iadecola C. The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals. Trends Neurosci 25 12 (2002) 621-625
17. Li T.Q., Haefelin T.N., Chan B., et al. Assessment of hemodynamic response during focal neural activity in human using bolus tracking, arterial spin labeling and BOLD techniques. NeuroImage 12 4 (2000) 442-451
18. Shulman R.G., Rothman D.L., Behar K.L., and Hyder F. Energetic basis of brain activity: implications for neuroimaging. Trends Neurosci 27 8 (2004) 489-495
19. Aubert A., and Costalat R. A model of the coupling between brain electrical activity, metabolism, and hemodynamics: application to the interpretation of functional neuroimaging. NeuroImage 17 3 (2002) 1162-1181
20. Horwitz B., Friston K.J., and Taylor J.G. Neural modeling and functional brain imaging: an overview. Neural Netw 13 8-9 (2000) 829-846
21. Goldman-Rakic P.S. Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 11 (1988) 137-156
22. Varela F.J. Resonant cell assemblies: a new approach to cognitive functions and neuronal synchrony. Biol Res 28 1 (1995) 81-95
23. Van Essen D.C., Anderson C.H., and Felleman D.J. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science 255 5043 (1992) 419-423
24. Phillips W.A., and Singer W. In search of common foundations for cortical computation. Behav Brain Sci 20 4 (1997) 657-683 [discussion 683-722]
25. Varela F., Lachaux J.P., Rodriguez E., and Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2 4 (2001) 229-239
26. Hebb D. The organization of behavior: a neurophysiological theory (1949), Wiley, New York
27. Girard P., Hupe J.M., and Bullier J. Feedforward and feedback connections between areas V1 and V2 of the monkey have similar rapid conduction velocities. J Neurophysiol 85 3 (2001) 1328-1331
28. Gray CM. The temporal correlation hypothesis of visual feature integration: still alive and well. Neuron 1999;24(1):31-47, 111-125.
29. Tononi G., Edelman G.M., and Sporns O. Complexity and coherence: integrating information in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2 (1998) 474-484
30. Sporns O., Chialvo D.R., Kaiser M., and Hilgetag C.C. Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci 8 9 (2004) 418-425
31. Gerstein G.L., and Perkel D.H. Simultaneously recorded trains of action potentials: analysis and functional interpretation. Science 164 881 (1969) 828-830
32. McIntosh A., and Gonzalez-Lima F. Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2 (1994) 2-22
33. Aersten A., and Preissl H. Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks. In: Schuster H.G. (Ed). Non-linear dynamics and neuronal networks (1991), VCH Publishers Inc, New York 281-302
34. Buchel C., and Friston K. Assessing interactions among neuronal systems using functional neuroimaging. Neural Netw 13 8-9 (2000) 871-882
35. Marrelec G., Horwitz B., Kim J., Pelegrini-Issac M., Benali H., and Doyon J. Using partial correlation to enhance structural equation modeling of functional MRI data. Magn Reson Imaging 25 8 (2007) 1181-1189
36. Marrelec G., Kim J., Doyon J., and Horwitz B. Large-scale neural model validation of partial correlation analysis for effective connectivity investigation in functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp (2008)
37. Rogers B.P., Morgan V.L., Newton A.T., and Gore J.C. Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. Magn Reson Imaging 25 10 (2007) 1347-1357
38. Rogers B.P., Morgan V.L., Newton A.T., and Gore J.C. Comment on "Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI". Magn Reson Imaging 26 1 (2008) 146
39. Au Duong M.V., Boulanouar K., Audoin B., et al. Modulation of effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis. NeuroImage 24 2 (2005) 533-538
40. Glabus M.F., Horwitz B., Holt J.L., et al. Interindividual differences in functional interactions among prefrontal, parietal and parahippocampal regions during working memory. Cereb Cortex 13 12 (2003) 1352-1361
41. Schlosser R.G., Wagner G., and Sauer H. Assessing the working memory network: studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging and structural equation modeling. Neuroscience 139 1 (2006) 91-103
42. Schlosser R., Gesierich T., Kaufmann B., et al. Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling. NeuroImage 19 3 (2003) 751-763
43. Kondo H., Morishita M., Osaka N., Osaka M., Fukuyama H., and Shibasaki H. Functional roles of the cingulo-frontal network in performance on working memory. NeuroImage 21 1 (2004) 2-14
44. Krause J.B., Taylor J.G., Schmidt D., Hautzel H., Mottaghy F.M., and Muller-Gartner H.W. Imaging and neural modelling in episodic and working memory processes. Neural Networks 13 8-9 (2000) 847-859
45. Charlton R.A., Landau S., Schiavone F., et al. A structural equation modeling investigation of age-related variance in executive function and DTI measured white matter damage. Neurobiol Aging (2007)
46. Rowe J., Friston K., Frackowiak R., and Passingham R. Attention to action: specific modulation of corticocortical interactions in humans. NeuroImage 17 2 (2002) 988-998
47. Mottaghy F.M., Willmes K., Horwitz B., Muller H.W., Krause B.J., and Sturm W. Systems level modeling of a neuronal network subserving intrinsic alertness. NeuroImage 29 1 (2006) 225-233
48. Erickson K.I., Ringo Ho M.H., Colcombe S.J., and Kramer A.F. A structural equation modeling analysis of attentional control: an event-related fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 22 3 (2005) 349-357
49. Kim J., Zhu W., Chang L., Bentler P.M., and Ernst T. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 28 2 (2007) 85-93
50. Rajah M.N., McIntosh A.R., and Grady C.L. Frontotemporal interactions in face encoding and recognition. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 8 3 (1999) 259-269
51. Stein J.L., Wiedholz L.M., Bassett D.S., et al. A validated network of effective amygdala connectivity. NeuroImage 36 3 (2007) 736-745
52. Rogers B.P., Carew J.D., and Meyerand M.E. Hemispheric asymmetry in supplementary motor area connectivity during unilateral finger movements. NeuroImage 22 2 (2004) 855-859
53. Grafton S.T., Sutton J., Couldwell W., Lew M., and Waters C. Network analysis of motor system connectivity in Parkinson's disease: modulation of thalamocortical interactions after pallidotomy. Hum Brain Mapp 2 (1994) 45-55
54. Toni I., Rowe J., Stephan K.E., and Passingham R.E. Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. Cereb Cortex 12 10 (2002) 1040-1047
55. Taniwaki T., Okayama A., Yoshiura T., et al. Functional network of the basal ganglia and cerebellar motor loops in vivo: different activation patterns between self-initiated and externally triggered movements. NeuroImage 31 2 (2006) 745-753
56. Zhuang J., LaConte S., Peltier S., Zhang K., and Hu X. Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination. NeuroImage 25 2 (2004) 462-470
57. Laird A.R., Robbins J.M., Li K., et al. Modeling motor connectivity using TMS/PET and structural equation modeling. NeuroImage (2008)
58. Taniwaki T., Okayama A., Yoshiura T., et al. Age-related alterations of the functional interactions within the basal ganglia and cerebellar motor loops in vivo. NeuroImage 36 4 (2007) 1263-1276
59. Karunanayaka P.R., Holland S.K., Schmithorst V.J., et al. Age-related connectivity changes in fMRI data from children listening to stories. NeuroImage 34 1 (2007) 349-360
60. Craggs J.G., Price D.D., Verne G.N., Perlstein W.M., and Robinson M.M. Functional brain interactions that serve cognitive-affective processing during pain and placebo analgesia. NeuroImage 38 4 (2007) 720-729
61. Bollen K. With new incremental structural index for general equation models made. Sociol Methods Res 17 (1989) 303-316
62. Hollander M., and Wolfe D.A. Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley series in probability and statistics: applied probability and statistic. 2nd ed. (1999), Wiley, New York
63. Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (methodology in the social sciences). 2nd ed. (2004), The Guilford Press, New York
64. Byrne B. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: BASIC concepts, applications, and programming (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London [reprint edition]
65. Buchel C., and Friston K.J. Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cereb Cortex 7 8 (1997) 768-778
66. Horwitz B. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. NeuroImage 19 2 Pt 1 (2003) 466-470
67. Gonzalez-Lima F., and McIntosh A. Analysis of neural network interactions related to associative learning using structural equation modeling. Math Comput Simul 40 1-2 (1995) 115-140
68. McIntosh A. Towards a network theory of cognition. Neural Netw 13 (2001) 861-876
69. Arbuckle J. Amos 6.0 update to the Amos user's guide (2005), SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago
70. Gavrilescu M., Stuart G.W., Waites A., Jackson G., Svalbe I.D., and Egan G.F. Changes in effective connectivity models in the presence of task-correlated motion: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 21 2 (2004) 49-63
71. Goncalves M.S., and Hall D.A. Connectivity analysis with structural equation modelling: an example of the effects of voxel selection. NeuroImage 20 3 (2003) 1455-1467
72. Hu L., and Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6 (1999) 1-55
73. Fan X., Thompson B., and Wang L. Effects of sample size, estimation methods and model specification on structural equation modelling. Struct Equ Modeling 6 (1999) 56-83
74. Bentler P., and Freeman E. Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems. Psychometrika 48 (1983) 143-145
75. Bentler P., and Bonett D. Significance tests and goodness off made off in the analysis covariance structure. Psychol Bull 88 (1980) 588-606
76. Bullmore E., Horwitz B., Honey G., Brammer M., Williams S., and Sharma T. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data?. NeuroImage 11 4 (2000) 289-301
77. Bollen K.A. A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res 17 (1989) 303-316
78. Tucker L.R., and Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38 (1973) 1-10
79. Jöreskog K.G., and Sörbom D. LISREL 8.5 user's reference guide (2000), Scientific Software International, Chicago (Ill)
80. Browne H.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equations models (1993), Sage Publications, Newbury Park (Calif)
81. Penny W.D., Stephan K.E., Mechelli A., and Friston K.J. Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. NeuroImage 23 Suppl 1 (2004) S264-S274
82. Arbuckle J. Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user's guide (2003), SmallWaters Corporation, Chicago