Responsible autonomy

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 0, Issue , 2017, Pages 4698-4704

  Dignum, Virginia ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS; AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; DESIGN PROCESS; ETHICAL BEHAVIOR; ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS; MAKING DECISION; SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

EID: 85031937662     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2017/655     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. [Aldewereld et al., 2010] Huib Aldewereld, S. Álvarez-Napagao, F. Dignum, and J. Vázquez-Salceda. Making norms concrete. In AAMAS'10, pages 807-814, 2010.
2. [Allen et al., 2005] C. Allen, I. Smit, and W. Wallach. Artificial morality: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3):149-155, 2005.
3. [Binmore, 2005] Ken Binmore. Natural justice. Oxford University Press, 2005.
4. [Björklund, 2003] Fredrik Björklund. Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: Effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44(5):459-466, 2003.
5. [Boella et al., 2006] Guido Boella, L. Van der Torre, and H. Verhagen. Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12(2-3):71-79, 2006.
6. [Bonnefon et al., 2016] Jean-François Bonnefon, Azim Shariff, and Iyad Rahwan. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293):1573-1576, 2016.
7. [Bryson and Kime, 2011] Joanna Bryson and Philip Kime. Just an artifact: why machines are perceived as moral agents. In IJCAI'11, pages 1641-1646, 2011.
8. [Conci et al., 2012] Mario Conci, Virginia Dignum, Dirk Heylen, and Jonas Beskow. Roadmap for casa (computer as social actors) technologies. final report EIT ICT labs activity RIHA 12124, 2012.
9. [Conte et al., 1998] Rosaria Conte, C. Castelfranchi, and F. Dignum. Autonomous norm acceptance. In International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pages 99-112. Springer, 1998.
10. [Cranefield et al., 2017] Stephen Cranefield, M. Winikoff, V. Dignum, and F. Dignum. No pizza for you: Value-based plan selection in bdi agents, 2017.
11. [Floridi and Sanders, 2004] Luciano Floridi and J. Sanders. On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and machines, 14(3):349-379, 2004.
12. [Foot, 1967] Philippa Foot. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. 1967.
13. [Friedman et al., 2006] Batya Friedman, Peter Kahn, and Alan Borning. Value sensitive design and information systems. Advances in Management Information Systems, 6:348-372, 2006.
14. [Gigerenzer, 2010] Gerd Gigerenzer. Moral satisficing: Rethinking moral behavior as bounded rationality. Topics in cognitive science, 2(3):528-554, 2010.
15. [Graham et al., 2011] Jesse Graham, Brian Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva, and Peter Ditto. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(2):366, 2011.
16. [Hofstede and Hofstede, 2001] Gert Hofstede and G. Hofstede. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations. Sage, 2001.
17. [Lay et al., 2011] Ken Lay, O. C. Ferrell, and L. Ferrell. The responsibility and accountability of ceos: The last interview with ken lay. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2):209-219, 2011.
18. [Li et al., 2014] Wenchao Li, Dorsa Sadigh, Shankar Sastry, and Sanjit Seshia. Synthesis for Human-in-the-Loop Control Systems, pages 470-484. Springer, 2014.
19. [Malle et al., 2015] Bertram Malle, Matthias Scheutz, Thomas Arnold, John Voiklis, and Corey Cusimano. Sacrifice one for the good of many?: People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In Proc. 10th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 117-124. ACM, 2015.
20. [Misener and Shladover, 2006] James Misener and S. Shladover. Path investigations in vehicle-roadside cooperation and safety: A foundation for safety and vehicle-infrastructure integration research. In Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2006, pages 9-16. IEEE, 2006.
21. [Modgil and Prakken, 2013] Sanjay Modgil and Henry Prakken. A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence, 195:361-397, 2013.
22. [Russell and Norvig, 2009] Stuart Russell and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education, 3rd edition, 2009.
23. [Schwartz, 2006a] Shalom Schwartz. An Overview Basic Human Values: Theory, Methods, and Applications Introduction to the Values Theory. Jerusalem Hebrew University, 2006.
24. [Schwartz, 2006b] Shalom Schwartz. A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 5(2):137-182, 2006.
25. [Searle, 2010] John Searle. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford UP, 2010.
26. [Sen, 2004] Amartya Sen. Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4):315-356, 2004.
27. [van de Poel, 2013] Ibo van de Poel. Translating Values into Design Requirements, pages 253-266. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2013.
28. [van den Hoven, 2005] Jeroen van den Hoven. Design for values and values for design. Information Age +, Journal of the Australian Computer Society, 7(2):4-7, 2005.
29. [Verdiesen et al., 2016] Ilse Verdiesen, Martijn Cligge, Jan Timmermans, Lennart Segers, Virginia Dignum, and Jeroen van den Hoven. MOOD: Massive open online deliberation platform a practical application. In 1st Workshop on Ethics in the Design of Intelligent Agents, pages 6-11, 2016.
30. [Wallach and Allen, 2008] Wendall Wallach and Collin Allen. Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, 2008.