Automated driving: Safety blind spots

Safety Science

Volumn 102, Issue , 2018, Pages 68-78

  Noy, Ian Y ^a   Shinar, David ^b   Horrey, William J ^a  

^a LIBERTY MUTUAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SAFETY   (United States)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Autonomous vehicles; Driver vehicle interaction; Psychology; Safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; LEVEL OF AUTOMATIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIETAL BENEFITS; VEHICLE INTERACTIONS;

AUTOMATION;

AUTOMATION; AVIATION; CAR DRIVER; CAR DRIVING; DRIVING ABILITY; HUMAN; LEGAL LIABILITY; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MOTOR VEHICLE; OPERATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; TRUST;

EID: 85031761393     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.018     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Bainbridge, L., Ironies of automation. Automatica 19 (1983), 775–779.
2. Bazilinskyy, P., Kyriakidis, M., De Winter, J., An international crowdsourcing study into people's statements on fully automated driving. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2534–2542, 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.540.
3. Blanco, M., Atwood, J., Russell, S., Trimble, T., McClafferty, J., Perez, M., Automated vehicle crash rate comparison using naturalistic data. 2016, Final Report of the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute Available at https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/64420/Automated%20Vehicle%20Crash%20Rate%20Comparison%20Using%20Naturalistic%20Data_Final%20Report_20160107.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
4. Bonnefon, J.F., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352 (2016), 1573–1576.
5. Carayon, P., Hancock, P., Leveson, N.G., Noy, Y.I., Sznelwar, L., van Hootegem, G., Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety – developing the conceptual framework. Ergonomics: Special Issue on Sociotech. Syst. Saf. 58 (2015), 548–564.
6. de Winter, J.C., Dodou, D., Why the Fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation. Cogn. Technol. Work 16 (2014), 1–11.
7. Dingus, T.A., Guo, F., Lee, S., Antin, J.F., Perez, M., Buchanan-King, M., Hankey, J., Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 (2016), 2636–2641, 10.1073/pnas.1513271113.
8. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K., Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy and Practice 77 (2015), 167–181.
9. Fitts, P.M., Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system. 1951, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
10. Google, 2016. Google self-driving car project monthly report – February, 2016. Online at https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//selfdrivingcar/files/reports/report-0216.pdf.
11. Hampton, M.E., Memorandum: enhanced FAA oversight could reduce hazards associated with increased use of flight deck automation. 2016, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
12. Hauer, E., An exemplum and its road safety morals. Accid. Anal. Prev. 94 (2016), 168–179.
13. Hendricks, D.L., Fell, J.C., Freedman, M., The relative frequency of unsafe driving acts in serious injury accidents. final report submitted to NHTSA under contract No. DOT NH 22 94 C 05020. veridian engineering. 2001, Springer, Buffalo, NY.
14. Horrey, W.J., Lesch, M.F., Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., Lee, J.D., Calibration of skill and judgment in driving: Development of a conceptual framework and the implications for road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 76 (2015), 25–33.
15. Horswill, M.S., Waylen, A.E., Tofield, M.I., Drivers' ratings of different components of their own driving skill: a greater illusion of superiority for skills that relate to accident involvement. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34 (2004), 177–195.
16. IBM Institute for Business Value, The economy of things: extracting new value from the internet of things IBM corporation. 2015, Somers, NY Available online at http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/economyofthings/.
17. IEEE, 2014. You won't need a driver's license by 2040. IEEE.org, online at http://sites.ieee.org/itss/2014/09/15/you-wont-need-a-drivers-license-by-2040/.
18. Lee, J.D., Moray, N., Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 40 (1994), 153–184.
19. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46 (2004), 50–80.
20. Leveson, N.G., Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
21. Lonsdale Systems, Software quality essentials. http://lonsdalesystems.com/site/course/software_quality_essentials.php, 2016.
22. Martens, M., van den Beukel, A.P., The road to automated driving: dual mode and human factors considerations. The 16th international IEEE annual conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC 2013), The Netherlands, 2013, 2262–2267.
23. Metzger, U., Parasuraman, R., The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: an empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Hum. Factors 43 (2001), 519–528.
24. Muir, B.M., Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics 37 (1994), 1905–1922.
25. NHTSA, Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. 2013, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington DC.
26. NHTSA, 2016. Federal Autopmated Vehicles Policy. DOT HS 812 329.
27. Noy, Y.I., Supervisory control: the new dimension in driving. 19th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Association of Canada, Vancouver, 1986.
28. Noy, Y.I., Intelligent route guidance: will the new horse be as good as the old?. The IEEE Conference On Vehicle Navigation And Information Systems, Toronto, 1989.
29. Noy, Y.I., Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces. 1997, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
30. Noy, Y.I., Towards process-oriented requirements for ITS safety assurance. J. Int. Assoc. Traffic and Saf. Sci., Special Feature ITS and Saf. 22 (1998), 23–28.
31. Noy, Y.I., Hettinger, L.J., Dainoff, M.J., Carayon, P., Leveson, N.G., Robertson, M.M., Courtney, T.K., Editorial: emerging issues in sociotechnical systems thinking and workplace safety. Ergonomics: Special Issue on Sociotech. Syst. Saf. 58 (2015), 543–547, 10.1080/00140139.2014.1001445.
32. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), Table 1–26: average age of automobiles and trucks in operation in the United States. 2015, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_26.html_mfd.
33. Otte, D., Pund, B., Jänsch, M., 2009. A new approach of accident causation analysis by seven steps Paper No. 09–0245, ACASS 21st ESV Conference, Stuttgart, Germany.
34. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V., Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors 39 (1997), 230–253.
35. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Syst. Hum. 30 (2000), 286–297.
36. Parasuraman, R., Wickens, C.D., Humans: still vital after all these years of automation. Hum. Factors 50 (2008), 511–520.
37. Prenzler, C., New survey compares demographic of Tesla Model X vs. Model S buyer. http://www.teslarati.com/survey-model-x-owners-income-double-model-s/, 2017.
38. Preuk, K., Stemmler, E., Schießl, C., Jipp, J., Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles’ drivers?. Accid. Anal. Prev. 95:Part A (2016), 149–156.
39. Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G., Zanna, M.P., Trust in close relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 49, 1985, 95.
40. Sabey, B.E., Staughton, G.C., Interacting roles of road, environment, and road user in accidents. Fifth international conference of the international association for accident and traffic medicine, and the 3rd international conference on drug abuse of the international council on alcohol and addiction, London, UK, 1975.
41. SAE, Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. 2016, SAE International, 30 http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201609/.
42. Salmon, P.M., Read, G.J.M., Stevens, N.J., Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia. Accid. Anal. Prev., 2016.
43. Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Pilot error versus sociotechnical systems failure: a distributed situation awareness analysis of Air France 447. Theor. Issues in Ergonomics Sci. 17:1 (2016), 64–79.
44. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum. Factors 37 (1995), 5–19.
45. Saxby, D.J., Matthews, G., Warm, J.S., Hitchcock, E.M., Neubauer, C., Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: Discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts. J. Exper. Psychol.: Appl. 19 (2013), 287–300.
46. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the US, the UK, and Australia. 2014, The University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
47. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. 2014, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
48. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., A preliminary analysis of real-world crashes involving self-driving vehicles. 2015, The University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
49. Sharples, S., Automation and technology in 21st century work and life. Bust, P.D., (eds.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2009, 2009, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 208–217.
50. Shinar, D., Psychology on the road: the human factor in traffic safety. 1978, Wiley and Sons, New York.
51. Shinar, D., Traffic safety and human behavior. 2nd ed., 2017, Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK.
52. Singh, S., Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the national motor vehicle crash causation survey. 2015, US. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
53. Sitkin, S.B., Roth, N.L., Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4 (1993), 367–392.
54. Sivak, M., Schoettle, B., Road safety with self-driving vehicles: general limitations and road sharing with conventional vehicles. 2015, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
55. Tan, H.H., Tan, C.S., Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 126, 2000, 241.
56. Treat, J.R., Tumbas, N.S., McDonald, S.T., Shinar, D., Hume, R.D., Mayer, R.R., Stansifer, R.L., Castellan, N.J., Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents: final report. Volume I: causal factor tabulations and assessments. 1979, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington DC.
57. VDA, Automation: from driver assistance systems to automated driving. 2015, VDA Magazine. Verband der Automobiliinsdustrie e.V, Berlin.
58. WHO, Global status report on road safety 2015. 2015, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
59. Wickens, C.D., Gordon-Becker, S., Liu, Y., Lee, J.D., An introduction to human factors engineering. second ed., 2003, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
60. Yadron, D., Tynan, D., Tesla driver dies in first fatal crash while using the autopilot mode. 2016, The Guardian online at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jun/30/tesla-autopilot-death-self-driving-car-elon-musk.