Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles’ drivers?

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 95, Issue , 2016, Pages 149-156

  Preuk, Katharina ^a   Stemmler, Eric ^a   Schießl, Caroline ^a   Jipp, Meike ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assisted driver; Intelligent transport system; Safety; Start up assistance system; Traffic light assistance system; Unequipped vehicle's driver

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CRASHWORTHINESS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; MULTICASTING; SAFETY ENGINEERING; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION;

ASSISTANCE SYSTEM; ASSISTED DRIVER; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; PENETRATION RATES; SYSTEM DEVELOPERS; TIME TO COLLISION; TRAFFIC SITUATIONS; UNEQUIPPED VEHICLE'S DRIVER;

VEHICLES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECELERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROBABILITY; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; SAFETY; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECELERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; SAFETY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84978499665     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Björklund, G.M., Åberg, L., Driver behaviour in intersections: formal and informal traffic rules. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8:3 (2005), 239–253.
2. Blaauw, G., Driving experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: a validation study. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 24:4 (1982), 473–496.
3. Brookhuis, K., de Waard, D., Janssen, W., Behavioural impacts of advanced driver assistance systems—an overview. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 1:3 (2001), 245–253.
4. Deffenbacher, J.L., Lynch, R.S., Oetting, E.R., Swaim, R.C., The driving anger expression inventory: a measure of how people express their anger on the road. Behav. Res. Ther. 40:6 (2002), 717–737.
5. Eis, V., Sferco, R., Fay, P., Detailed analysis of the characteristics of European rear impacts. Proceedings of International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2005.
6. Farah, H., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Saifuzzaman, M., Kölbl, R., Fuchs, S., Bankosegger, D., Evaluation of the effect of cooperative infrastructure-to-vehicle systems on driver behavior. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 21:1 (2012), 42–56.
7. Frehse, B., Kognitive Bewertungsdimensionen von Ärger im Straßenverkehr (Doctoral dissertation). 2015, Leuphana Universität.
8. GDV, Unfallforschung der Versicherer, 2013. Innerörtliche Unfälle mit Fußgängern und Radfahrern.
9. Godley, S.T., Triggs, T.J., Fildes, B.N., Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accid. Anal. Prev. 34:5 (2002), 589–600.
10. Grayson, G.B., Hydén, C., Kraay, J.H., Muhlrad, N., Oppe, S., The Malmö Study. 1984, A calibration of Traffic Conflict Techniques, Leidschendam.
11. Green, M., How long does it take to stop? Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transp. Hum. Factors 2:3 (2000), 195–216.
12. Harbluk, J.L., Noy, Y.I., Trbovich, P.L., Eizenman, M., An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39:2 (2007), 372–379.
13. Houtenbos, M., Expecting the Unexpected Doctoral Dissertation. 2008, Delft University of Technology.
14. Johansson, G., Rumar, K., Drivers’ brake reaction times. Human 13:1 (1971), 23–27.
15. Katsaros, K., Performance study of a green light optimal speed advisory (GLOSA) application using an integrated cooperative ITS simulation platform. Proceedings of Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2011, 918–923.
16. Kostyniuk, L.P., Eby, D.W. Exploring rear-end roadway crashes from the driver's perspective, 1998, The University Of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
17. Kircher, K., Gelau, C., Vierkötter, M., Rakic, M., Bärgman, J., Kotiranta, R., 2008. FESTA Support Action Field opErational teSt supporT Action D2. 1—A Comprehensive Framework of Performance Indicators and their Interaction.
18. Kulmala, R., Rämä, P., Sihvola, N., Safety impacts of cooperative systems. Proceedings of 21 st ICTCT Workshop, Riga, Letland., 2008.
19. Kusano, K.D., Gabler, H., Method for estimating time to collision at braking in real-world, lead vehicle stopped rear-end crashes for use in pre-crash system design. Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst. 4 (2011), 435–443.
20. Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., Summala, H., Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 31:6 (1999), 617–623.
21. Lee, H.C., Cameron, D., Lee, A.H., Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: on-road versus simulated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 35:5 (2003), 797–803.
22. Mühlbacher, D., Zimmer, J., Fischer, F., Krüger, H.-P., The multi-driver simulator—a new concept of driving simulation for the analysis of interactions between several drivers. de Waard, D., Onnasch, L., Wiczorek, R., Manzey, D., (eds.) Human Centred Automation, 2011, Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, the Netherlands, 147–158.
23. Maccubbin, R., Staples, B., Kabir, F., 2008. Intelligent transportation systems benefits, costs, deployment, and lessons learned: 2008 Update, U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Washington, D.C.
24. Malone, K., Rech, J., Hogema, J., Innamaa, S., Hausberger, S., Dippold, M., Visintainer, F., 2014. DRIVE C2X— Deliverable D11.4: Impact Assessment and User Perception of Cooperative Systems. Retrieved from: http://www.drive-c2x.eu/tl_files/publications/Deliverables%20and%20abstracts/DRIVE%20C2X_D11.4_Impact_Assessment_v1.0_full%20version.pdf.
25. Manstetten, D., Bengler, K., Busch, F., Färber, B., Lehsing, C., Neukum, A., Schendzielorz, T., UR:BAN MV—a German project focusing on human factors to increase traffic safety in urban areas. Proceedings of 20th ITS World Congress, Tokyo, Japan, 2013.
26. Martens, M.H., Stimuli fixation and manual response as a function of expectancies. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 46:3 (2004), 410–423.
27. Mesken, J., Hagenzieker, M.P., Rothengatter, T., de Waard, D., Frequency, determinants, and consequences of different drivers’ emotions: an on-the-road study using self-reports, (observed) behaviour, and physiology. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10:6 (2007), 458–475.
28. Muhrer, E., Vollrath, M., Expectations while car following—the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:6 (2010), 2158–2164.
29. Näätänen, R., Summala, H., Road User Behavior and Traffic Accidents. 1976, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam: North Holland.
30. Najm, W.G., Sen, B., Smith, J.D., Campbell, B.N., 2003. Analysis of Light Vehicle Crashes and Pre-Crash Scenarios Based on the 2000 General Estimates System.
31. Oeltze, K., Schießl, C., Benefits and challenges of multi-driver simulator studies. IET Intel. Transp. Syst. 9:6 (2015), 618–625.
32. Olson, P.L., Sivak, M., Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Hum. Factors 28:1 (1986), 91–96.
33. Otto, T., Kooperative Verkehrsbeeinflussung und Verkehrssteuerung an signalisierten Knotenpunkten (Doctoral dissertation). 2011, University of Kassel.
34. Proskawetz, K.-O., Klug, S., Beckert, B., 2013. Smart Cities and Communities − Key to Innovation Integrated Solution—Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems and Services (C-ITS). Retrieved from: https://eu-smartcities.eu/sites/all/files/Cooperative%20Intelligent%20Transport%20Systems%20and%20Services%20-%20Smart%20Cities%20Stakeholder%20Platform%20january.pdf.
35. Reed, M.P., Green, P.A., Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics 42:8 (1999), 1015–1037.
36. Riener, A., Assessment of simulator fidelity and validity in simulator and on-the-road studies. Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 3:3 (2010), 110–124.
37. Rittger, L., Muehlbacher, D., Maag, C., Kiesel, A., Anger and Bother Experience when Driving with a Traffic Light Assistant: A Multi-driver Simulator Study. de Waard, D., Sauer, J., Röttger, S., Kluge, A., Manzey, D., Weikert, C., Hoonhout, H., (eds.), 2015, Human Factors in High Reliability Industries, 41–52.
38. Russell, E.R., Using concepts of driver expectancy, positive guidance and consistency for improved operation and safety. Proceedings of Transportation Conference, 1998, 155–158.
39. Segel, L., Dugoff, H., Campbell, J.D., Jorgeson, C.M., Murphy, R.W., Brake Force Requirement Study: Driver- Vehicle Braking Performance as a Function of Brake System Design Variables. 1970, University of Michigan.
40. Shinar, D., Compton, R., Aggressive driving: an observational study of driver, vehicle, and situational variables. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36:3 (2004), 429–437.
41. Staubach, M., Schebitz, N., Köster, F., Kuck, D., Evaluation of an eco-driving support system. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 11–21.
42. Stephens, A.N., Groeger, J.a., Following slower drivers: lead driver status moderates driver's anger and behavioural responses and exonerates culpability. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 22 (2014), 140–149.
43. Törnros, J., Driving behaviour in a real and a simulated road tunnel—a validation study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 30:4 (1998), 497–503.
44. Totzke, I., Mühlbacher, D., Buld, S., Krüger, H.-P., simTD (Sichere intelligente mobilität—testfeld deutschland): empirische wirkungsermittlung von Car-2-X-Technologien im feldversuch und in der fahrsimulation. Proceedings of 19. Aachener Kolloquium Fahrzeug- Und Motorentechnik, Aachen: fka Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen mbH Aachen, 2010, 1701–1712.
45. Van Der Horst, R., A Time-based Analysis of Road User Behaviour in Normal and Critical Encounters Doctoral Dissertation. 1990, Delft University of Technology.
46. Vogel, K., What characterizes a free vehicle in an urban area?. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 5:1 (2002), 15–29.
47. Wege, C., Will, S., Victor, T., Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings—a naturalistic driving study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 58 (2013), 259–270.
48. Wickens, C.D., Helleberg, J., Goh, J., Xu, X., Horrey, W.J., Field, M., 2001. Pilot Task Management: Testing an Attentional Expected Value Model of Visual Scanning. Savoy, Illinois.
49. Yan, X., Abdel-Aty, M., Radwan, E., Wang, X., Chilakapati, P., Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40:1 (2008), 274–288.