The interaction triangle as a tool for understanding stakeholder interactions in marine ecosystem based management

Marine Policy

Volumn 52, Issue , 2015, Pages 155-162

  Röckmann, Christine ^a   van Leeuwen, Judith ^a   Goldsborough, David ^b   Kraan, Marloes ^a   Piet, Gerjan ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b University of Applied Sciences   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Context; Credibility; Ecosystem based management; Legitimacy; Participation; Salience

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 84920138564     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Anadón J.D., Giménez A., Ballestar R., Pérez I. Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conserv Biol 2009, 23:617-625.
2. Arkema K.K., Abramson S.C., Dewsbury B.M. Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation. Front Ecol Environ 2006, 4:525-532.
3. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plann Assoc 1969, 35:216-224.
4. Badalamenti F., Ramos A.A., Voultsiadou E., Sánchez Lizaso J.L., D'Anna G., Pipitone C., et al. Cultural and socio-economic impacts of Mediterranean marine protected areas. Environ Conserv 2000, 27:110-125.
5. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 2000, 10:1251-1262.
6. Biermann F., Gupta A. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: a research framework. Ecol Econ 2011, 70:1856-1864.
7. Brown M. Review of Roger S. Pielke, Jr., the honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Minerva 2008, 46:485-489.
8. Cash D., Clark W.C., Alcock F., Dickson N., Eckley N., Jäger J. Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. Research programs 2002, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
9. Campbell L.N., Gray N.J., Hazen E.L., Shackeroff J.M. Beyond baselines: rethinking priorities for ocean conservation. Ecol Soc 2009, 14.
10. Christie P., Pollnac R.B., Oracion E.G., Sabonsolin A., Diaz R., Pietri D. Back to basics: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of local-level dynamics for the success of tropical marine ecosystem-based management. Coast Manage 2009, 37:349-373.
11. Christie P. Creating space for interdisciplinary marine and coastal research: five dilemmas and suggested resolutions. Environ Conserv 2011, 38(2):172-186.
12. Clark W.C., Tomich T.P., Noordwijk M.v., Dickson N.M., Catacutan D., Guston D., et al. Toward a general theory of boundary work: insights from the CGIAR's natural resource management programs 2010, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
13. Craye M., Funtowicz S., Van Der Sluijs J.P. A reflexive approach to dealing with uncertainties in environmental health risk science and policy. Int J Risk Assess Manage 2005, 5:216-236.
14. Currey K., Clark S., Pielke Roger A. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Policy Sci 2010, 43:95-98.
15. Curtin R., Prellezo R. Understanding marine ecosystem based management: a literature review. Mar Policy 2010, 34:821-830.
16. Dankel D.J., Aps R., Padda G., Röckmann C., van der Sluijs J.P., Wilson D.C., et al. Advice under uncertainty in the marine system. ICES J Mar Sci 2012, 69:3-7.
17. De Vos B.I., Mol A.P.J. Changing trust relations within the Dutch fishing industry: the case of National Study Groups. Mar Policy 2010, 34(887-895).
18. De Vos B.I., Van Tatenhove J.P.M. Trust relationships between fishers and government: new challenges for the co-management arrangements in the Dutch flatfish industry. Mar Policy 2011, 35(218-225).
19. Dreyer M., Renn O. Participatory approaches to modelling for improved learning and decision-making in natural resource governance: an editorial. Environ Policy Governance 2011, 21:379-385.
20. Dreyer M., Renn O. Synopsis of the literature reviews for guidance on using participatory modeling in fisheries governance. Deliverable 2.6.2 of EU project JAKFISH (contract no. 212969) 2011, DIALOGIK, Stuttgart.
21. Ehler, C, Douvere F. Visions for a Sea change, report of the first iinternational workshop on marine spatial planning. UNESCO, Paris; 2006.
22. Espinosa-Romero M.J., Chan K., McDaniels T., Dalmer D.M. Structuring decision-making for ecosystem-based management. Mar Policy 2011, 35:575-583.
23. Fanning L., Mahon R., McConney P. Towards marine ecosystem-based management in the Wider Caribbean. MARE publication series no. 6 2011, 425. Amsterdam University Press.
24. FAO 1995. Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. Article 6.4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, FAO. 1995. 41 p. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/v9878e/v9878e00.htm.
25. Ferreyra C., Beard P. Participatory evaluation of collaborative and integrated water management: insights from the field. J Environ Plann Manage 2007, 50:271-296.
26. Fiorino D.J. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 1990, 15:226-243.
27. Flannery W., Cinnéide M.Ó. Deriving lessons relating to marine spatial planning from canada's eastern scotian shelf integrated management initiative. J Environ Policy Plann 2012, 14:97-117.
28. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL.
29. Gieryn T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Soc Rev 1983, 781-795.
30. Gieryn T.F. Boundaries of science. Handbook of science and technology studies 1995, 393-443. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, T. Pinch (Eds.).
31. Gupta A. Transparency in global environmental governance: a coming of age?. Global Environ Polit 2010, 10:1-9.
32. Guston D.H. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Hum Values 2001, 26:399-408.
33. Haapasaari, P., S. Mäntyniemi, S. Kuikka. 2009. Participatory modeling to enhance understanding and consensus within fisheries management: the Baltic Herring case. ICES CM 2009/O:13. Copenhagen, DK.
34. Haapasaari P., Kulmala S., Kuikka S. Growing into interdisciplinarity: how to converge biology, economics, and social science in fisheries research?. Ecol Soc 2012, 17:6.
35. Haapasaari P., Mäntyniemi S., Kuikka S. Baltic Herring fisheries management: stakeholder views to frame the problem. Ecol Soc 2012, 17(3):36.
36. Hauge K.H. Uncertainty and hyper-precision in fisheries science and policy. Futures 2011, 43:173-181.
37. Hegger D., Lamers M., Van Zeijl-Rozema A., Dieperink C. Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ Sci Policy 2012, 18:52-65.
38. Hessels L.K., Van Lente H. Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Res Policy 2008, 37:740-760.
39. Huntington H.P. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 2000, 10:1270-1274.
40. Huutoniemi K., Klein J.T., Bruun H., Hukkinen J. Analyzing interdisciplinarity: typology and indicators. Res Policy 2010, 39:79-88.
41. Jacobsen R.B., Wilson D.C.K., Ramirez-Monsalve P. Empowerment and regulation-dilemmas in participatory fisheries science. Fish Fish 2011, 1-12.
42. Jasanoff S. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers 1990, Harvard University Press.
43. Jentoft S., Chuenpagdee R. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Policy 2009, 33:553-560.
44. Jentoft S. Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2000, 24:141-148.
45. Johnson T.R., van Densen W.L.T. Benefits and organization of cooperative research for fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci 2007, 64:834-840.
46. Jones P.J.S. Equity, justice and power issues raised by no-take marine protected area proposals. Mar Policy 2009, 33(5):759-765. 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.009.
47. Kasperson R.E. Six propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication. Risk Anal 1986, 6:275-281.
48. Klein J.T. Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 2004, 36:515-526.
49. Klinke A., Dreyer M., Renn O., Stirling A., Van Zwanenberg P. Precautionary risk regulation in european governance. J Risk Res 2006, 9:373-392.
50. Kooiman J., Bavinck M., Chuenpagdee R., Mahon R., Pullin R. Interactive governance and governability: an introduction. J Transdisciplinary Environ Stud 2008, 7:1-11.
51. Kraan M., Uhlmann S., Steenbergen J., Van Helmond A.T.M., Van Hoof L. The optimal process of self-sampling in fisheries: lessons learned in the Netherlands. J Fish Biol 2013, 83:963-973.
52. Kraan M., Hendriksen A., van Hoof L., van Leeuwen J., Jouanneau C. How to dance? The tango of stakeholder involvement in marine governance research. Mar Policy 2014, 50:347-352.
53. Larkin P.A. Concepts and issues in marine ecosystem management. Rev Fish Biol Fish 1996, 6:139-164.
54. Leslie H.M., McLeod K.L. Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Front Ecol Environ 2007, 5:540-548.
55. Linke S., Jentoft S. A communicative turnaround: shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance. Mar Policy 2012, 38:337-345.
56. Lofstedt R., Bouder F., Wardman J., Chakraborty S. The changing nature of communication and regulation of risk in Europe. J Risk Res 2011, 14:409-429.
57. Luoma S.N., Löfstedt R.E. Contaminated Salmon and the Public's Trust. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41:1811-1814.
58. Mahon R., Fanning L., McConney P. A governance perspective on the large marine ecosystem approach. Mar Policy 2009, 33:317-321.
59. Mathbor G.M. Chapter 6: a typology of community participation. Effective community participation in coastal development 2008, 144. Lyceum Books, Inc.
60. McLeod, KL, Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Rosenberg AA. Scientific consensus statement on marine ecosystem-based management. Signed by 221 academic scientists and policy experts with relevant expertise. The communication partnership for science and the Sea. 21; 2005.
61. Mikalsen K.H., Jentoft S. From user-groups to stakeholders? The public interest in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2001, 25:281-292.
62. Mitchell R.B., Clark W.C., Cash D.W. Chapter 11: information and influence. Global environmental assessments: information and influence 2006, 307-338. The MIT Press, (August 4, 2006). 1st ed. R.B. Mitchell, W.C. Clark, D.W. Cash, N.M. Dickson (Eds.).
63. Mostert E., Pahl-Wostl C., Rees Y., Searle B., Tàbara D., Tippett J. Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecol Soc 2007, 12:19.
64. Munton R. Deliberative democracy and environmental decision making. Negotiating change: advances in environmental social science 2003, 63-80. Edward Elgar, Camberley. F. Berkhout, I. Scoones, M. Leach (Eds.).
65. Murawski S.A. Ten myths concerning ecosystem approaches to marine resource management. Mar Policy 2007, 31:681-690.
66. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Introduction: 'Mode 2' Revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 2003, 41:179-194.
67. Ounanian K., Delaney A., Raakjær J., Ramirez-Monsalve P. On unequal footing: stakeholder perspectives on the marine strategy framework directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management. Mar Policy 2012, 36:658-666.
68. Peters R.G., Covello V.T., McCallum D.B. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal 1997, 17:43-54.
69. Phillipson J., Symes D. Science for sustainable fisheries management: an interdisciplinary approach. Fish Res 2012, 139:61-64.
70. Pickett S.T.A., Burch W.R., Grove J.M. Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 1999, 2:302-307.
71. Pielke R.A. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics 2007, Cambridge University Press.
72. Piet G.J., Jansen H.M., Rochet M.-J. Evaluating potential indicators for an ecosystem approach to fishery management in European waters. ICES J Mar Sci: Journal du Conseil 2008, 65:1449-1455.
73. Pomeroy R., Douvere F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar Policy 2008, 32:816-822.
74. Raakjaer Nielsen J., Mathiesen C. Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Denmark. Mar Policy 2003, 27:409-416.
75. Raakjaer Nielsen, J, Vedsmand T. Fisheries co-management: an alternative strategy in fisheries-cases from Denmark - 1-33 An issue paper for the OECD study on the efficient management of living marine resources; 1995.
76. Raakjaer J., Van Leeuwen J., van Tatenhove J., Hadjimichael M. Ecosystem-based marine management in European regional seas calls for nested governance structures and coordination-a policy brief. Mar Policy. 2014, 50:373-381.
77. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 2008, 141:2417-2431.
78. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., et al. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:1933-1949.
79. Refsgaard J.C., van der Sluijs J.P., Højberg A.L., Vanrolleghem P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-a framework and guidance. Environ ModellSoftware 2007, 22:1543-1556.
80. Renn O. Risk governance. Coping with uncertainty in a complex world 2008, Earthscan, London.
81. Renn O., Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication 1990, Springer.
82. Röckmann C., Ulrich C., Dreyer M., Bell E., Borodzicz E., Haapasaari P., et al. The added value of participatory modelling in fisheries management-what has been learnt?. Mar Policy 2012, 36:1072-1085.
83. Skolnikoff E.B. The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics-by Roger A. Pielke, Jr. Rev Policy Res 2008, 25:71-73.
84. Stelzenmüller V., Vega Fernández T., Cronin K., Röckmann C., Pantazi M., Vanaverbeke J., et al. Assessing uncertainty associated with the monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas. Mar Policy 2015, 51:151-162.
85. Sutherland W.J., Spiegelhalter D., Burgman M. Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims. Nature 2013, 503:335-337.
86. Tallis H., Levin P.S., Ruckelshaus M., Lester S.E., McLeod K.L., Fluharty D.L., et al. The many faces of ecosystem-based management: making the process work today in real places. Mar Policy 2010, 34:340-348.
87. Tosun C. Towards a typology of community participation in the tourism development process. Anatolia 1999, 10:113-134.
88. Tress B., Tress G., Fry G. Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environ Manage 2005, 36:792-807.
89. Tyler, C. 2013. Top 20 things scientists need to know about policy-making. the Guardian, 2 December 2013 . http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/02/scientists-policy-governments-science.
90. Ulrich C., Coers A., Hauge K.H., Clausen L.W., Olesen C., Fisher L., et al. Improving complex governance schemes around Western Baltic Herring, through the development of a Long-Term Management Plan in an iterative process between stakeholders and scientists 2010, ICES, Copenhagen, DK.
91. Van der Sluijs J.P. A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment. Futures 2002, 34:133-146.
92. Van der Sluijs J.P. Uncertainty and dissent in climate risk assessment: a post-normal perspective. Nat Cult 2012, 7:174-195.
93. Van Der Sluijs J.P., Craye M., Funtowicz S., Kloprogge P., Ravetz J., Risbey J. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Anal 2005, 25:481-492.
94. Van der Sluijs J.P., Petersen A.C., Janssen P.H.M., Risbey J.S., Ravetz J.R. Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions. Environ Res Lett 2008, 3:024008.
95. Van Leeuwen J., van Hoof L., van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2012, 36:636-643.
96. Verweij M., Van Densen W., Mol A. The tower of Babel: different perceptions and controversies on change and status of North Sea fish stocks in multi-stakeholder settings. Mar Policy 2010, 34:522-533.
97. Webler T., Renn O. A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice. Fairness and competence in citizen participation 1995, 17-33. Springer, Netherlands. O. Renn, T. Webler, P. Wiedemann (Eds.).
98. Wilson D.C. The paradoxes of transparency. Science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe 2009, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
99. Young J.C., Jordan A., Searle K.R., Butler A., Chapman D.S., Simmons P., et al. Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation?. Biol Conserv 2013, 158:359-370.