Mixed methods

Reviewing Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 139-150

  Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031297053     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203813324-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Bergman, M. (2010). Hermeneutic content analysis: Textual and audiovisual analyses within a mixed methods framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 379–396). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 95–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Chilisa, B. (2011). Indigenous Research Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Christ, T. W. (2010). Teaching mixed methods and action research: Pedagogical, practical, and evaluative consideration. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 643–676). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427.
7. Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11, 195–203.
8. Gorard, S. (2010). Research design, as independent of methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 237–253). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Greene, J. & Hall, J. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 119–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Harris, R., Holmes, H., & Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research ethics in sign language communities. Sign Language Studies, 9(2), 104–131.
12. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed Methods Research: Merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press.
13. Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42–61.
14. Johnson, R. B., Onweugbuzie, A., & Turner, L. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.
15. Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Ethical practices in qualitative research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Ginsburg (Eds.), Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 150–169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Lincoln, Y. S. (2010). “What a long, strange trip it’s been...”: Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(1), 3–9.
17. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revised. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Melfi, M. (2011). Italy revisited: Folk sayings on aging. www.italyrevisited.org. Accessed July 27, 2011.
20. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. New York: Guilford.
21. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Mertens, D. M. & Ginsberg, P. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of Social Research Ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48–76.
24. Morse, J. (2010). Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor and complexity. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 339–352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcock, J. H., & Brown, L. M. (2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: Moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 305–338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Nilsen, A. & Brannen, J. (2010). The use of mixed methods in biographical research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 677–724). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. O’Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 531–557). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Stanfield, J. H. (2011). Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods. Walnut Hills, CA: Left Coast Press.
29. Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Teddlie, C. & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100.